Channel
@crazycallz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
606subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001669910117 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @crazycallz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/crazycallz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:24 | 606 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:00 | 608 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 608 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
5 reactions across 3 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 40.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 January 2025 to 9 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
Blind ape into this 🦍 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/ELruuFttC4irUNW6cJSRVfQ9fjyjRXgE9JbMEWQQtmUq?t=1741884315067
Rugged 🤮
LFG 2X +++
Peace coin aped 110k mc Following new tweet. President Trump has secured a peace deal with Ukraine finally. Moving well, near highs so find safe entries. Links below. Risky degen. Ad. Always do your own research. Disclaimer https://x.com/MAGAVoice/status/1899527133237752259 https://www.dextools.io/app/en/solana/pair-explorer/2TAcWadw3teUqNkcDKXaXGv71DX3YEpZ9FNYDUz4WHSF?t=1741808186982
2.5x since call over 800k mc 🚀 Im still holding https://www.dextools.io/app/en/token/therealcocoro?t=1741784023505
Aped some $Cocoro on $SOL 330k Mc Followed the boys Maythous and many others into this. The market needs a runner and animals are the only thing I'm trusting right now. As we all saw, kabosu’s owner announced their new dog ‘"Cocoro" and so far there has been no runners. We saw Neiro do 1B+ and the market needs a big play. A big team has just launched it on Solana with good art and a good backing. QFp94pu1bbUq3o2Q…
$San Touched 41 Milly for 164x 🚀
❤1
I made 3 YouTube Videos on This No one was more bullish 🐂 hit 34 million for over a 60x
🤩2❤1
Hit 16 million for a 32x told everyone
Think pow and King have aped heavy, but GAMBLE tho 390k mc C9BaMdJJqxNg9wV9MntLBAk9CPRRPSyt8c1weKMQpump
I aped this Have been put over a year with a doxxed dev They are migrating to Solana Real utility and tech And partnership with trading view extension and everything. 15 hrs to load up before trading stops https://dexscreener.com/ethereum/0xb6D5905Da55C030ec74eFc95143b221a1f59c6F8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @crazycallz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@crazycallz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crazy Callz” (@crazycallz), 606 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/crazycallz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.