Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for @ Craig Tucker .

Channel

@ Craig Tucker .

@cragesside

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003812881847
TypeChannel
Username@cragesside
DescriptionПринадлежит каналу — @southsidenet0 Не воспринимайте всё сказанное на свой счёт.
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cragesside

Growth

1811 Aug 2026, 05:01 — 18 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 19:16 — 18 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 05:0111 Aug 2026, 19:16
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17–19 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 19:1618no change
11 Aug 2026, 05:0118first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 9 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
76.9%
avg views ÷ 18 subscribers
Avg views / post
13.8
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
18.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 19 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (9 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total277
Reactions total48
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 19:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 19 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2450.0%
🍓1429.2%
💘24.17%
🥰24.17%
👍12.08%
👏12.08%
🖕12.08%
😁12.08%
😢12.08%
😱12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC6 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Такер внимательно выслушивал его, глядя куда-то вдаль. он знал, что связываться с бандой Стэна — плохая идея. особенно с таким отмороженным придурком как Кенни. влезать в разборки он никогда не горел желанием, но прямо сейчас, рядом сидел близкий ему человек и не находил себе места из-за чужой глупости, от чего руки невольно начинали чесаться. к чёрту, он даже думать об этом не хочет. мысли путались, а ед

1

11 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC10 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Крэйг нахумрился, заметив эту натянутую улыбку. очевидно, пытается сохранить свой образ.. полная лажа. "зачем он снова проворачивает этот фокус? я буквально вижу его насквозь." —...раунд.- я уже и сам не помню. — вздох. — чел, всё настолько плохо? я же вижу, что приставка тебе не помогает. #interact

2🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC11 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

за окном шёл проливной дождь. да уж, это лето оставляло желать лучшего..но Крэйгу такая погода нравилась гораздо больше, нежели бесконечно палящее солнце и духота, от которой хотелось сбежать как можно скорее. сидя на диване перед телевизором, он то и дело бросал взгляды на своего дружка, сидящего рядом. даже приставка не смогла его развеселить. неужели всё настолько плохо? — эй, Клайд. произнёс он сухо,

2

11 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

а вообще — это самый глупый вопрос, который мне присылали в анон. за исключением одного мудака, что решил заспамить весь мессенджер сиськастым Картманом...-

3

11 Aug 2026, 16:00 UTC12 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#anon если бы ты был животным, то каким? кроме морских свинок! ...даже не знаю. наверное, медведем. можно лечь в спячку на полгода и даже не знать, что происходит в этом дебильном городе. моя мечта.🙂‍↕️ #message | @craigtuckss_bot

2🥰1

11 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC13 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

хей, Толкин. без б, приходи ближе к пяти часам. в одиночку ему сопли подтирать мне не хочется.

2🍓1

11 Aug 2026, 07:01 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

#anon хочешь завести собаку? нет. не очень. во-первых, она может сгрызть Страйпа. во-вторых, родители точно не одобрят. они настолько безответственные, что один раз мама наступила на Страйпа №1 и- ...сломала ему позвоночник. будет рискованно заводить собаку, мало ли что может произойти. в третьих..у меня нет желания по нескольку раз в день выгуливать её. сомневаюсь, что кто-то из моей семьи захо

1🍓1😱1

11 Aug 2026, 05:13 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

навряд ли вообще большинство жителей и одноклассников в курсе, что ты завёл блог, lol.

💘21🍓1

11 Aug 2026, 05:12 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

чувак, ты просто психуешь. расслабься. никто не будет над тобой смеяться, всем плевать на твой блог с 13-тью сабами, очнись. если тебя это так сильно волнует — просто сделай его частным или вообще удали. ты создал его чтобы делиться своей жизнью, а не чтобы избегать всего подряд. представь тогда, каково живётся известным личностям. их поливают говном почти каждый день, но тем не менее — они идут вперёд

1🍓1😁1

11 Aug 2026, 04:10 UTC13 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

даже если кто-то и будет показывать пальцем — думаю, ты в состоянии за себя постоять. потому что подраться со мной — у тебя когда-то смелости хватило.

2🍓1👍1

11 Aug 2026, 04:09 UTC14 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

поверь мне, вокруг есть гораздо более значимые события и проблемы, на которые реально стоит обращать внимание, нежели твоя паника из-за шмеля, в блоге, на который подписано 13 человек.🫩

1🍓1😢1

11 Aug 2026, 03:42 UTC15 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

чел, почему тебе не всё равно. ты не единственный, кто создал блог, уймись.

1🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cragesside. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 328,159 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@ Craig Tucker .” (@cragesside), 18 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cragesside.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.