Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Крафтовое SEO | Вердыш Роман

@craftseo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

740subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001708226097
TypeChannel
Username@craftseo
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/craftseo

Growth

731740735.57 August 2026 — 732 subscribers7 August 2026 — 731 subscribers8 August 2026 — 731 subscribers15 August 2026 — 740 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 730–741 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 04:04740+9
8 Aug 2026, 02:04731no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:41731-1
7 Aug 2026, 12:16732first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 26 May 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9852.4%
🔥3317.6%
😁2714.4%
😱136.95%
🤬94.81%
👏63.21%
🤯10.535%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 1 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 13 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @craftseo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 May 2025 to 1 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Jul 2026, 09:06 UTC307 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Тестирую так же разные размещения от ребят, кто предлагает ссылочное. Цена это всегда спорный вопрос, хочется дешево, но чтобы за 2-3 ссылки в топ выводило 😄 Тогда математика удачно складывается, 10 страниц * 3 ссылки * 20$ за ссылку = 600$, клиенту продаем за 3000$ и всё, кайф 😁 Потому я никогда не обсуждаю цену, т.к. кто хочет дешево - найдет дешевле всегда. Но вот впервые столкнулся с форматом работы у западных

👍6😁2

21 Jun 2026, 07:13 UTC352 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔗 Продажа ссылок с моей PBN #PBN #линкбилдинг #ссылки #услуги Предлагаю размещение на моей сетке сайтов. Реализован комбайн по поиску, поднятию сайтов (и с нуля и с архива) и размещению с них ссылок. Сетка пополняется ежедневно в реальном времени. --- 🌐 О СЕТИ САЙТОВ 1️⃣ 940 сайтов и ежедневно пополняются 2️⃣ Каждый сайт имеет чистую или логично восстановленную историю 3️⃣ Не более 40 ссылок с сайта (исходящих вс

🔥9👍8🤬1

16 Jun 2026, 12:16 UTC425 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как там позиции в Яндексе? 😁 Похоже гугловские технологии с обрезкой парсеров дошли и до нас. Прям кучно пошло за последние 4 дня: - 12 июня порезало позиции (судя по всему все же именно XML, т.к. траф + средняя по вебмастеру не изменились). - Проблемы с выдачей результатов за пределами ТОП-10 Ждем кратного повышения цен от сборщиков походу.

😱4🤬3

11 Jun 2026, 12:44 UTC475 views23 reactions4 Starsread 8 August 2026

Как всегда когда работы наваливается - писать и заниматься своими проектами тупо некогда 😄 Это прям плохо, т.к. вроде свое-родное, но клиентское же всегда в приоритете же. И с точки зрения бизнеса, наверное, так быть не должно. Но... Произошло много всякого, ушел сильно в автоматизации, AI, разработку (тот еще вайбкодер) и линкбилдинг, посколько хорошо ложится на мои нынешние увлечения. Сеошка никуда не делась, я

👍13🔥6👏4

20 Oct 2025, 15:05 UTC≈1,070 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @seohardcorePhoto

Привет любителям повтыкать в патенты Гугла и Яндекса ) Дропнул первую пачку разборов патентов Google на https://seohardcore.ru/patents/ 1300 из ~2500 шт. Недавно Иван запустил сайт https://hoolz.ru/patents/, классный продукт для обучения. Я вдхоновился этой идеей и выложил уже готовые разборы, и они получились качественными и полезными. Чтива там надолго))) Разборы структурированы, есть навигация на основные разде

🔥8👍5

7 Sept 2025, 07:42 UTC≈1,130 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какими AI вы пользуетесь именно для генерации текста?

  1. Claude25%
  2. Qwen3%
  3. DeepSeek15%
  4. Grok46%
  5. GPT532%
  6. Mistral2%
  7. Gemini 2.5 pro17%
  8. Gemini 2.5 Flash8%
  9. Другая нейронка3%
  10. Хочу посмотреть результаты26%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍1🔥1

7 Sept 2025, 07:42 UTC861 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Я тут некоторое сравнение нейронок делаю для своих задач по генерации текстов. Выбрал самые последние модели, работа через API везде. Промты единые с кучей данных, ключами, структурой, ответами на вопросы, с парсингом конкурентов и т.д., но генерация в итоге с промта, потому важно чтобы по окну контекста проходил промт 😁. Потом сведение все в таблицу и погоняю по сервисам + сравню каждый сет с ТОП-1 Яндекса, Гугла и

👍26🔥2🤯1

4 Sept 2025, 09:26 UTC687 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто любит ковыряться с нейронками и вот этим всем - рекомендую рейтинг энкодеров для русского языка https://github.com/avidale/encodechka и сразу на HuggingFace: https://huggingface.co/spaces/Samoed/Encodechka. Все круто, но старо, как говно мамонта, есть аналог под мультиязычные модели (хотя в целом, наверное рейтинг все еще актуален плюс-минус). Но есть еще такая штука: https://huggingface.co/spaces/mteb/leaderbo

🔥4👍3

23 Aug 2025, 10:07 UTC774 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Что-то Claude после обновления до 4 версии (не скажу, что почувствовал разницу хоть какую-то в повседневных задачах) стали лимиты часовые улетать просто. На 3.8 точно окно лимитов были сильно больше, а тут - только начинаешь работать и хоп "давай-как покури часок" или купи Max (как-то много этого слова в последнее время 👹) подписку. 4.1 версию - там вообще только понюхать успеешь, 4-5 запросов и привет. 💡 А еще о

👍9

16 Jul 2025, 11:28 UTC864 views28 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

ВСЕГДА делайте бэкапы Лучше каждый день или хотя бы через день. Пофиг на опыт и т.д. За деньги? Пофиг, платите. Сегодня я в спешке перепутал строку и удалил свой сайт 😐️ Никогда даже в теории не мог предволожить такой косяк, но... Боже, храни Beget с их ежедневными бэкапами, которые всегда сами включаются по-умолчанию и работают без сбоев.

😁19👍8😱1

26 Jun 2025, 07:18 UTC≈1,010 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Серьезно? Уже 6 рекламных блоков сверху? 😐️ Видна только 1 позиция на 1 экране. Когда будет маркет/картинки/видео и прочее - выдача начинаться будет со 2 экрана. CTR будет сказочный 😁

👍11😱5🤬2🔥1

6 Jun 2025, 13:55 UTC≈1,100 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Подшаманил немного свое решение закладок для нейросетей Решил посмотреть, какие улучшения предложат ChatGPT (3 попытки, чтобы получить результат, ощущение, что он деградирует), Gemini, DeepSeek, Claude (результаты соответственно на скринах). На мой взгляд Claude лучше всех понял "Современный дизайн" (еще и адаптива какого-никакого отсыпал), но Gemini самый лаконичный в гугловском стиле 😃 В этом месяце поделюсь обн

👍8🔥2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @craftseo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2025, 07:42 UTCAnonymous Poll210 voters

Какими AI вы пользуетесь именно для генерации текста?

  1. Claude25%
  2. Qwen3%
  3. DeepSeek15%
  4. Grok46%
  5. GPT532%
  6. Mistral2%
  7. Gemini 2.5 pro17%
  8. Gemini 2.5 Flash8%
  9. Другая нейронка3%
  10. Хочу посмотреть результаты26%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2025 to 1 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Крафтовое SEO | Вердыш Роман” (@craftseo), 740 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/craftseo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.