Channel
@cqkncjbg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
453subscribers
-60 since we began measuring on 29 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004484798809 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cqkncjbg |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 21 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 5 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 5 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cqkncjbg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:59 | 453 | -60 |
| 29 Sept 2026, 07:22 | 513 | no change |
| 29 Sept 2026, 06:47 | 513 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (21 August 2026 – 27 September 2026) |
| Views total | 2,262 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
7 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 27 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
出击经费: 699 出击日期:2026/9/25 出击次数:第二次 妹子特点:温柔，很会🐍 妹子缺点:穿的裤子 颜值评分:8 综合评分:10 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 让店长帮我找个能接799的，然后店长叫了苹果过来，一开始看见妹妹进来穿的长裤，本来我还有点不高兴，但是她太会亲了，嘴对嘴的教，跟老师上课一样，情绪价值也给的到位，直接抵消所有负面情绪。妹妹是性感风，不是那种可爱风，一个小时的时间半个小时都在🐍，给我嘴都整酸了，服务真的到位，后面聊天也是句句有回应，基本上要求都能满足，只能说非常牛逼。
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 出击经费: 1200 出击日期:2026/09/26 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:非常主动放得开 会聊 妹子缺点:暂无 颜值评分:8 综合评分:9 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 一上来就非常会主动聊天，非常放得开，皮肤白，尺度好，香香的，聊天聊得很开心，幽默风趣，服务态度很好，有机会还来二刷。 综合评价： 非常主动，从一开始到结束都很认真配合，颜值也不踩雷能打，推荐！
出击经费: 699 出击日期:2026/9/25 出击次数:第二次 妹子特点:妹子性格很活泼 妹子缺点:没有缺点 颜值评分:9 综合评分:9 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 店长推的佳佳，看照片就觉得非常好看，见到真人以后颜值十分能打，跟照片几乎没有区别。进来先开始聊天，萝莉风女仆裙+白丝，情绪价值给的很足，基本上所有不过分的要求都可以满足，非常戳中审美，流程就是正常的摸摸抱抱亲亲，佳佳很活泼，聊天基本上都能接梗，也很幽默，身材非常好，也很瘦，抱起来很轻，下次有机会一定再来。
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 出击经费: 699 出击日期:2026/09/24 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:羊羊很可爱，也很配合，情绪价值给的很足，进门一直聊天，很活泼，后面直接骑在我身上，抱着亲亲，舌吻也给的很深入，很会撩人，感觉比照片还好看，跟她聊天都会很热情回应，非常主动，非常好的一次体验。 颜值评分:9 综合评分:9 出击过程： 本人与照片很相似，身材蛮好，体验也挺好的，挺有感觉的。有机会再来。
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 出击经费: 699 出击日期:2026/09/16 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:菲菲蛮听话的，让跨坐在身上就跨坐在身上，想要姿势基本都会配合，胸不是很大，B，胸型很好看，也蛮粉的，年龄不大。 妹子缺点:有些姿势她会嫌累。有点抗拒用手玩奶头，嫌痒，但用嘴还是配合的。 颜值评分:8 综合评分:8 出击过程： 本人与照片很相似，身材蛮好，体验也挺好的，挺有感觉的。有机会再来。
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 出击经费: 699 出击日期:2026/05/21 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:宁宁非常主动，热情开朗，性格很好，颜值身材俱佳 妹子缺点:暂无 颜值评分:9 综合评分:8 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 本人与照片一致，身材很好，有恋爱一般的体验，可以让你忘记生活的烦恼，情绪价值很足，整个过程时间过的很快，非常细心很会照顾人。 综合评价： 非常好，超出预期的体验，值得有机会再来
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 名字：uu 出击经费:699 出击日期:2026/09/11 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:情绪价值，脸，女友感 颜值评分:9 综合评分:8 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 综合评价：第一次玩私影，打算下午5 6点去 柯南说是晚上7 8点能还选 但是后面有事，柯南推荐了个隐藏妹妹，到点先给我推荐了别的妹妹，最后是才隐藏的uu，确实没的说一眼惊艳。 因为第一次不知道该做什么，uu就找话题，慢慢牵我的手，靠在我身上聊天，（确实很有女友感啊）uu很主动，跨在我身上就开亲，uu吻技很好，🐍的很爽，各种挑逗，想摸胸也会主动把衣服褪去，uu🐻很软，大概有个b+或者c，身材是那种梨形，有肉感，摸起来软软的。 体验非常棒啊，柯南推荐的果然不错，找回了那种年少青涩的感觉，性价比很高，还会再来的。
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 名字：小A 出击经费:699 出击日期:2026/09/4 出击次数:第1次 妹子特点:情绪价值，脸 颜值评分:10 综合评分:10 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 综合评价：这是我第一次接触私影，一开始看套餐的内容只是搂搂亲亲之类的，感觉不值。因为之前自己约了几次被骗没成功过，都是又老又丑，这次就想来试试私影。体验了之后，发现完全不一样。 来之前我选了小A，因为听说小A有颜值有服务。初次见面，虽然和照片不像，但可以肯定的说是个顶级美女。见面的时候真的很惊艳很高兴，能约到这样的美女。刚开始不知道流程有点拘束，小A让我按着套餐来，我就大胆起来。我喜欢接吻，这次我主要是想体验接吻，小A也很主动，吻了很多次没有不耐烦。我年龄不大，后面知道她大我几岁，她就像姐姐一样教我接吻，教我怎么呼吸。后面我们还交流了自己感情经历，得到了姐姐的鼓励，感觉真的很愉快。 这次体验真的很棒，感觉上了一堂温馨…
❤3
战报： 这次本来没抱太大希望。 毕竟私影这东西，第一次去的时候多少有点好奇，真到了第二次，反而会觉得大概也就是聊天、看电影、抱一抱，能有什么特别的。 板块名字自带喜感，属于那种见面以后会让你重新调整预期的类型。 刚见面的时候，我其实有点懵。 照片和真人完全是两回事，真人距离感一近，杀伤力直接上来了。刚开始两个人都有点客气，我甚至有点不知道该怎么接话。 板砖倒是挺会带节奏，没有让气氛一直僵着。她先问我路上顺不顺、最近在看什么电影，还顺手把漱口水递到我手边。那种小动作不算夸张，但一下就让人没那么紧绷了。 聊了一会儿以后，明显放松下来。她不是那种一直催流程的人，反而会根据你的状态慢慢推进，所以整个过程不会有特别强的“任务感”。中间我有点冷场，她还笑着说我看起来比第一次更紧张，结果我自己都被逗笑了，气氛也就自然打开了。 真正开始靠近以后，我个人感觉才是这次的重点。 第一次亲吻的时候，脑子里其实就一个想法： 卧槽，真的有点像谈恋爱。 成年…
店名:#重庆柯南女仆私人影院 名字：东东 出击经费:2000 出击日期:2026/08/20 出击次数:第2次 妹子特点:情绪价值，脸 颜值评分:10 综合评分:10 （1-5雷 6-8正常 9-10幻神） 出击过程： 综合评价：经历过电报初次被骗，第二次无法顺利起飞降落，还是来到了私影。来之前其实并不报很高期待，毕竟字面上看套餐内容，搂搂抱抱看个电影能有多大意思？也就怀着试一试的想法来到了店里。来之前就确定了要点东东。 初次见面时还是非常紧张，不仅是因为初次私影不知道流程，而是因为东东太漂亮，而且都还有点拘谨，就公式化的互相问了好。东东没有让对话因为紧张和尴尬冷下来，而是开始分享起自己的生活，让我慢慢打开了自己的话匣。在这过程中东东也在正好的时机逐渐靠近。 这之后的过程因为我本人性格原因不太会描述。但我想告诉读着这个报告的那些经历和我一样困扰的朋友们，如果你对其他店的服务感到空虚，感到自己没用被真正触及到心灵，觉得需要一个人紧…
❤1
8.16 【美女昵称】:佳佳 【验证人】 : yelon fiery 【身材】：均匀润弹 小腿还挺长 【性格】:活泼可爱 【凶器，是否假奶】:b 【肤色，手感】 :白嫩软滑 【人照相似度】:9-10 乖甜，照是实照 【服务过程】:柯南小哥以惊呼哇哦，她不一样了的态度让人蠢蠢欲动，今天顶美速来，遂约好时间，推门进来的妹妹笑意盈盈，几乎与门框一样高，白丝大腿袜紧紧箍着浑圆长腿，裙裙蓬松香甜，甜甜的朝你笑带着酒窝，弯弯的淡烟眉，更值得一提的是抿唇看见了一颗小嘴钉，这下更是反差更添几分想要被欺负的叛逆，但是在她身上却是协调活泼。拉过小手凑近，发现妹妹净高差不了多少公分，跟妹子近距离抱抱，全身贴合的感受满足了欧。今天画了桃花色眼妆，与双马尾和白皙的皮肤搭配的非常甜妹。另外就是要不断找开话题聊近距离，这种丝丝若即若离的感觉，就是亲热见不到（嗯，这可不行，得值回票价，没有体验怎么写报告，加大力度），玩起猜猜乐，提出抱抱骑乘，嗯所得即尝，软软…
测评评论全部客户真实测评 直接转发的没有本店写的假测评 💗联系客服💗💗双向联系💗♥️选人频道❤️💗聊天群组💗 进群抽奖最大奖励可拿白嫖
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cqkncjbg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“重庆柯南测评报告” (@cqkncjbg), 453 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cqkncjbg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.