Channel
@ruoruo885
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,283subscribers
-380 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003716273212 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ruoruo885 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 16 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ruoruo885 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:39 | 1,283 | -61 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:24 | 1,344 | -83 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:56 | 1,427 | -82 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 1,509 | -58 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 1,567 | -61 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:45 | 1,628 | -35 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 1,663 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (16 June 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,380 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 05:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
【综合评价分】：10 【身材形象分】：10 【服务态度分】：10 【情绪价值分】：10 ————————— 【学生留名】：呆呆 【验证时间】：8-9 【老师艺名】：若若 【上课花费】：700p 【服务内容】：69 口 毒龙 水中潇 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】：7米的价格性价比挺高，报着试试的态度cj若若，居家 制服诱惑。妹子年轻漂亮，态度很好，丝滑般的越觉，环境卫生安全，口活一流，吹的时候差点就缴械了，小弟弟翘得很高，肥肥的大屁股，后入直接爽，夹得很紧，浑身抽搐，忍不住射在了她的屁股上，喜欢的狼友冲。 联系方式：https://t.me/cangjingkongx
在线等哥哥约哦❤️
天气晴朗，很适合约课哦
【综合评价分】：10 【身材形象分】：10 【服务态度分】：10 【情绪价值分】：10 ————————— 【学生留名】：juyou 【验证时间】：8-3 【老师艺名】：若若 【上课花费】：1300pp 【服务内容】：69课表都有 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】：无意看到若若妹子，是自己喜欢的类型，于是果断约了pp，进门一看，非常漂亮，个子比照片稍微矮一点，有160 身材匀很棒，肚子没有赘肉，妹妹很有女友感觉。开始洗澡，换衣服开整，具体细节忘记了，感觉还不错，需求基本都能满足，p完，也聊了很久的天，这个价位非常的值 联系方式：https://t.me/cangjingkongx
哥哥还不来 你在等什么😡
【综合评价分】：10 【身材形象分】：10 【服务态度分】：10 【情绪价值分】：10 ————————— 【学生留名】：123 321 【验证时间】：7月25 【老师艺名】：若若 【上课花费】：700p 【服务内容】：与课表一致 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】：上次去过若若后觉得不错这次又来返了。换了新地方比较不好找但更安全。先抱着蛇下。熟悉的闲聊脱衣一起洗澡，边聊边摸摸奶子她边帮我洗澡。洗毕躺床上开始服务。忍不住先和她蛇了一会。接着她开始舔胸，我玩奶子。顺势帮我口。差不多了就戴套，这次还试了兄弟教的动作，坐在床边抱着囸起来。还是不够熟练，换回自己熟悉的动作。还是很喜欢跟若若面对面传教士姿势，做的感觉上来都蛇在一起的感觉。若若做爱很认真，也很好囸。但是我有点不在状态，可能是因为我兄弟EDC在别处阳痿的经历影响了我的心情。最后没出到。洗澡走人。 联系方式：https://t.me/cangjingkongx
谢谢哥哥给我的仪式感😍
粉色难道哥哥不喜欢嘛😔
【综合评价分】： 10 【身材形象分】： 10 【服务态度分】： 10 【情绪价值分】： 10 ————————— 【学生留名】： Silas shen 【验证时间】： 7.16 【老师艺名】： 若若 【上课花费】： 700p 【服务内容】： 如下 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】：非常温柔的老师，迟到10分钟她只轻笑，顺便给我顺延了时间，我也不好意思赖着，今天决定继续当123了。梨形身材软弹，趴上去像抱女友，屁股又大又舒服，仔细把玩了许久，挑逗得老师浑身颤抖，初入极窄，包裹感非常强，抽插的回弹感特别好，床上干净香香的。老师不催不赶，全程态度非常好，姿势配合，反馈真实，给人很亲近的感觉。最近遇到几个态度不好的，让我觉得若若老师的表现弥足珍贵，所以愉快的一个姿势，冲到底123秒了。 联系方式：https://t.me/cangjingkongx
努力胜过一切 🉑约哦
今天定制的是丝袜的诱惑😱😱😱
【综合评价分】： 10 【身材形象分】： 10 【服务态度分】： 10 【情绪价值分】： 10 ————————— 【学生留名】： Legend _x 【验证时间】： 07.09 【老师艺名】： 若若 【上课花费】： 1300pp 【服务内容】： 课表上 ————————— 【出击课程体验描述】看到老师本人，真人居然比照片还好看，老师给了杯水，我休息了一下，就去洗澡。老师身材真的超级棒，一手捂不住的双峰，老师很主动会聊天，聊聊生活，接着老师突然含住了我的兄弟，比较敏感，几次差点脱缰，幸好及时被我悬崖勒马，不等兄弟喘息的机会，随后又是共赴巫山云雨，快让我123....这个过程很放松很舒服，后面第二回合，我完全掌握了主动，一边亲吻着老师的肌肤，一边不停的使出我的浑身解数，伴随着身体的一阵抽搐，结束了最后一回合的战斗。战斗结束后老师会像女朋友一样躺在我旁边，我们互相抚摸着，吐诉心肠，身材一级棒，双峰软嫩Q弹，捏起来手感超棒，身上有淡淡…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @ruoruo885. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 309,704 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“若若 个人工作室” (@ruoruo885), 1,283 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ruoruo885.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.