Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for C/C++ Programming

Channel

C/C++ Programming

@cpp_programming_books

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

5,408subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166299208
TypeChannel
Username@cpp_programming_books
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cpp_programming_books

Growth

5,4055,4105,407.523 August 2026 — 5,405 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,410 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,408 subscribers5,40823 August 202627 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,404–5,411 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 01:325,408-2
24 Aug 2026, 05:355,410+5
23 Aug 2026, 03:155,405first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

9 Sept 2025, 16:08 UTC≈7,860 viewsread 23 August 2026

hey guys 👋 long time no see... The most fun part of programming is automation and writing code once and make it work like a slave for the rest of your life! I have been working on such project lately and recently finished it! If you have some passion or interest towards Electric cars, please consider joining my new channel, dedicated to EV news! And best part is that it is fully automated and keeps working for me e

Signed Rustam

20 May 2025, 23:01 UTC≈8,040 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @exceljson

Hello guys 👋 Now v1.0.7 is out with amazing features! Now you can customize column's: - Header texts - Font weight - Font style - Text position - Background and Text colors What features do you want to see in v1.0.8? Feel free to write in the comments and let's take JSON to Excel conversion to next step together! 👉 @ExcelJson

Signed Rustam

12 May 2025, 07:25 UTC≈7,080 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @exceljsonPhoto

Coming soon... What can be added or improved? Don't hesitate to share your opinions 😉 👉 @ExcelJson

Signed Rustam

21 Apr 2025, 15:40 UTC≈7,780 viewsread 23 August 2026

Hi everyone 👋 Recently I started building a utility website which helps users to convert JSON files into Excel files and last week I deployed MVP of it at exceljson.com I'm actively working on it and improving it! As a result of the above poll I can see that some of you need a great tool for this task, I also have needed one... I opened another channel @ExcelJson to share my journey on building this website and co

Signed Rustam

17 Apr 2025, 04:37 UTC≈6,090 viewsread 23 August 2026

If you know great tools for this task please share them in the comments!

Signed Rustam

17 Apr 2025, 04:36 UTC≈5,980 viewsread 23 August 2026
Poll

Hi guys! Have you ever had a situation where you needed an online JSON to Excel converter and you couldn't find a good one?

  1. No, I haven't needed such tool.57%
  2. Yes, but I found a great tool14%
  3. Yes, I still need such service29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Rustam

2 Apr 2025, 07:02 UTC≈6,400 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @prog_referencePhoto

🖥 GooeyGUI is a lightweight library for creating graphical user interfaces (GUI) in the C language! 🌟 It was originally developed for X11 environments but now supports cross-platform functionality. GooeyGUI provides a wide range of customizable widgets, such as buttons, sliders, dropdown menus, and text fields, as well as flexible layouts, including horizontal, vertical, and grid-based arrangements. 🔐 License: GPL-

Signed Rustam

18 Mar 2025, 06:09 UTC≈5,760 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Many have tried and all have failed... 👉 @cpp_programming_books

Signed Rustam

16 Mar 2025, 04:43 UTC≈5,550 viewsread 23 August 2026
Photo

Just some tips... 👉 @cpp_programming_books

Signed Rustam

6 Mar 2025, 07:07 UTC≈6,040 viewsread 23 August 2026
File

Stanford CS Education Library This is document #101, Essential C, in the Stanford CS Education Library. 👉 @cpp_programming_books

Signed Rustam

26 Feb 2025, 12:02 UTC≈6,360 viewsread 23 August 2026
Forwarded from @prog_referencePhoto

cpplinks

Signed Rustam

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @cpp_programming_books. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

17 Apr 2025, 04:36 UTCAnonymous Poll91 voters

Hi guys! Have you ever had a situation where you needed an online JSON to Excel converter and you couldn't find a good one?

  1. No, I haven't needed such tool.57%
  2. Yes, but I found a great tool14%
  3. Yes, I still need such service29%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 November 2024 to 9 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 951,056 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“C/C++ Programming” (@cpp_programming_books), 5,408 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpp_programming_books.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.