Channel
@cpidometr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
65subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002448657487 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cpidometr |
| Description | Хе, вот и новый канал BD) 💥 Можете называть меня просто - Чопой. Мест. - он/его [мужской род] |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cpidometr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:45 | 65 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 65 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
313 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5226464823973266969 | 73 | 23.3% | |
| 💊 | 62 | 19.8% | |
| ❤ | 50 | 16.0% | |
| custom 5420417128924722721 | 28 | 8.95% | |
| custom 5337198181899839263 | 24 | 7.67% | |
| ❤🔥 | 24 | 7.67% | |
| 😭 | 18 | 5.75% | |
| custom 5229097235198784181 | 12 | 3.83% | |
| 🌭 | 9 | 2.88% | |
| custom 5328295681062881495 | 4 | 1.28% | |
| custom 5217485138279026100 | 3 | 0.958% | |
| custom 5323543875275484474 | 3 | 0.958% | |
| 💘 | 3 | 0.958% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 26 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cpidometr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2025 to 26 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ха- Канал закрылся ещё сентября так 6-го, а я ничего и не писал, да и не собирался до этого момента- Можете уходить, здесь больше ничего не будет, никогда🌟
😭18custom 53235438752754844743
Ой бля, случайно без текста скинул- КОРОЧЕ!! Помните ли Вы этого Ромео? Скорее всего нет, лол, ведь он был одним из очередных спойлеров скетча когда то давно. Но для меня он имеет большее значение. Феномен "Ромео в поле клеверов" представляет из себя определение совершенно всех моих не завершённых до конца работ. И, он мне всегда нравится, но никак не доходили руки дорисовать, особенно когда я сменил свой стиль в то …
custom 522646482397326696912❤4💊4custom 53371981818998392631
Кстати следующим будет Ромео, но.. Не простой Ромео)) Потом все узнаете😝))
custom 522646482397326696910💊3❤🔥2❤1
🌟 : "Блин, Габриэль!! Опять ты превратил чай в жидкий космос, ну как так можно?" Кхихи, люблю керамические глупые кружки.
❤13custom 52264648239732669697💊4❤🔥2💘1
Кто нибудь еще помнит об этой игре? Она прикольная, хихихи
custom 542041712892472272116custom 53282956810628814954custom 52264648239732669693❤2❤🔥1
Кажется в кружке не чай🤩
custom 522646482397326696912💊4❤3❤🔥1custom 54204171289247227211
Хе, опять брэндоны, только теперь их двое!! Взрослая версия, и маленькая, начиркал это на конкурс, посмотрим какое место займу BD)
💊14custom 54204171289247227214custom 52174851382790261003❤🔥2❤1
Артец по брэндону. Да не простому а по аушному от одного чела, ха. Ого это что подобие полноценки? Вау зарубите меня нахуй в компостере🙂
custom 522646482397326696911custom 53371981818998392637💊4❤3custom 54204171289247227211
Ещё партия глупышей!!!! Смешнявые такие, ха
❤🔥11custom 52290972351987841816❤5custom 52264648239732669693💊2
Габриэль чет полысел чутка- шикарно😍
💊9❤2
НАХУЙ ВОТЕРМАРКИ, НАХУЙ БЛИКИ, НАХУЙ ВСЁ- Держите буби которых я нарисовал ТОЛЬКО ради рефа на то какие у них носики😋 А РИСОВАТЬ Я КАК ВЫ ВИДИТЕ БУДУ КАЖДОМУ РАЗНЫЙ!!! ОНИ ИНДИВИДУАЛЬНЫЕ ПХПХАА
💊14custom 52264648239732669697❤4custom 52290972351987841811
Live stream finished (31 minutes)
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @cpidometr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
ЙО ЙО ПРИВКИИИ)) у меня тут возникла одна идея в которой я КРАЙНЕ, крайне не уверен.. Но всё таки ... Хотели ли бы вы стрим?? От меня??.. В котором я рисовал бы ваши просьбы и отвечал бы на интересующие вопросы?? Кха- 🙂
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2025 to 26 September 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,040,187 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Спидометр!!♿💥💀” (@cpidometr), 65 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpidometr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.