2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69–71 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 08:27
70
no change
13 Aug 2026, 22:05
70
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 17 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
179 reactions across 11 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 11.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5942901674304606163
21
11.7%
custom 4902326682980975467
17
9.50%
custom 5364116657499285751
16
8.94%
custom 5118861066981344121
14
7.82%
custom 4915896438879159184
13
7.26%
custom 5116368680279606270
13
7.26%
custom 5116648080787112958
13
7.26%
custom 5172632227871196306
10
5.59%
custom 6008353471202333128
9
5.03%
custom 5116414868357907335
8
4.47%
custom 5084923566848213749
7
3.91%
custom 5798446874574721625
7
3.91%
custom 4918203446202467778
5
2.79%
custom 5084613633418199991
5
2.79%
custom 5231489647946768652
5
2.79%
custom 5361563222132405424
5
2.79%
custom 5798757568213946011
4
2.23%
custom 5942683640289824740
3
1.68%
custom 5920248655280871170
2
1.12%
❤
2
1.12%
Custom emoji. 19 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 179reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2025 to 21 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
20
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 11 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cpeqq. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 March 2025 to 21 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
- متوفر سحب نجوم من القنوات 💜.
سعر الـ 1k بيكون على حسب سعر التون في الوقت الحالي💎 .
شروط السحب :
1- لازم تكون النجوم فوق 1k .
2- لازم يعدي عليهم 21 يوم في القناة .
- للتواصل : @xvxcc 💜.
- طرق دفعي : ( 𝖢𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖪 ) .
- مـتاح شـحـن نـجـوم شـرعـي🌟
50 نجـمـه ب 0.9 USDT او 45ج
75 نجـمـه ب 1.3 USDT او 70ج
100 نجـمـه ب 1.8 USDT او 85ج
150 نجـمـه ب 2.7 USDT او 130ج
200 نجـمـه ب 3.6 USDT او 170ج
350 نجـمـه ب 5.8 USDT او 290ج
500 نجـمـه ب 9 USDT او 425ج
750 نجـمـه ب 13 USDT او 640ج
1000 نجـمـه ب 17 USDT او 850ج
- للتواصل : @xvxcc 💜.
- طرق دفعي : ( 𝖢𝗅𝗂𝖼𝖪 ) .
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @cpeqq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 721,184 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@cpeqq named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@epdqq named in 1 post, 14 August 2026 – 14 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“◟𓏺 𝖬𝖺𝗋𝗄𝖾𝗍 𝖭𝖺𝖽𝖾𝗋 .” (@cpeqq), 70 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cpeqq.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
