Health & wellness — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 36 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 896–916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Sept 2026, 15:56
898
-2
4 Sept 2026, 07:40
900
-5
28 Aug 2026, 19:08
905
-3
22 Aug 2026, 08:56
908
-1
15 Aug 2026, 20:37
909
-5
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
914
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:06
914
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 22 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5s
Average length
5s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
273 reactions across 7 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
61
22.3%
❤
57
20.9%
⚡
43
15.8%
✍
22
8.06%
🔥
15
5.49%
👍
12
4.40%
🦄
12
4.40%
🥰
11
4.03%
👏
10
3.66%
🐳
5
1.83%
👌
5
1.83%
🌚
3
1.10%
😁
3
1.10%
😍
3
1.10%
😘
3
1.10%
🍌
2
0.733%
😇
1
0.366%
😎
1
0.366%
🙈
1
0.366%
🙉
1
0.366%
2 further kinds
2
0.733%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 273 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2025 to 20 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
5
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cozyskincare. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2025 to 20 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Гран-при среди мягчайщих умывалок по праву достается американскому Prequel с беспрецедентными 50% глицерина в составе. Никакие Round Lab, Needly и Celimax близко не стояли — хотя Dual Barrier Mild Gel Cleanser, надо признать, очень на него похож
Prequel — детище калифорнийского дерматолога Сэм Эллис, создавшей уход, максимально приближенный к профессиональным стандартам
«Наши продукты безопасны для людей с распрост…
Патологическая любовь к шикарным банкам и столь же непреодолимый страх перед перцовыми масками наконец-то нашли точку соприкосновения
Экземпляр нынче — охлаждающая маска с изящнейшей упаковкой. Аромат — свежий цитрус и пряный имбирь. Наносить можно на всю длину, хоть только на кожу головы
Эффект на десятку: приятно холодит, пробуждает кровообращение, но без жгучего фанатизма. После неё волосы невесомые и шелковисты…
Жил себе лосось спокойно и не знал, что станет самым желанным мужчиной в 2025 году
PDRN (Polydeoxyribonucleotide) — полидезоксирибонуклеотиды, высокомолекулярные биополимеры, состоящие из множества нуклеотидов, т.е. простым языком органические молекулы, являющиеся строительными блоками нуклеиновых кислот (ДНК и РНК), а также участвующие в ряде других важных клеточных процессов
Изначально источником PDRN были молоки…
Если вы пропустили айконик видео, с которого начался косметический бум и увлечение PDRN. Хотя инъекционно он используется уже лет 10
Кимусик рассказывает маме, что колет инъекции спермы лосося
Использую PDRN уже много лет в инъекциях ещё до того, как Ким Кардашьян заявила, что колет сперму лосося (отсюда и завирусился хайп вокруг DNA). Так вышло, что эта банка попала в руки и всё бы ничего, но это просто хорошая увлажнялка за много денег и обещаний
Итак, гость программы: пептидная лифтинг-сыворотка с ПДРН и микроиглами MEDIPEEL Phyto Exosome PDRN Lifting Serum. Звучит устрашающе. По текстуре как флюид, бы…
Три косметических продукта, которые бесконечно копируют: стики Charlotte Tilbury, масло Clarins и бальзамы Rhode
На этот раз Divage выпустили удачный бальзам с невероятно вкусными отдушками и удобным силиконовым аппликатором. Понравился гораздо больше Catrice: легко распределяется, полупрозрачная пигментация и приятная текстура. Пептидов тут, конечно, кот наплакал, ну а что мы хотим за 400 кровных. Rhode остаётся мо…
❤🔥12🔥10⚡8🦄4🥰3🍌1🐳1👏1
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @cozyskincare. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Маски, кремы, два кота” (@cozyskincare), 898 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cozyskincare.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
