Channel
@covidvaxinjury
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,306subscribers
-174 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001477384989 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @covidvaxinjury |
| Created | 1 February 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/covidvaxinjury |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 00:57 | 8,306 | -16 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 8,322 | -17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 8,339 | -22 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 07:16 | 8,361 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:29 | 8,375 | -16 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:12 | 8,391 | -10 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 15:47 | 8,401 | -10 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 23:27 | 8,411 | -14 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:12 | 8,425 | -10 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 8,435 | -19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:33 | 8,454 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:02 | 8,465 | -12 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 8,477 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,480 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:51 | 8,480 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 1 April 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
547 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 200 | 36.6% | |
| 😢 | 105 | 19.2% | |
| 🙏 | 65 | 11.9% | |
| 👍 | 62 | 11.3% | |
| ❤ | 58 | 10.6% | |
| 😱 | 22 | 4.02% | |
| 💯 | 18 | 3.29% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 0.914% | |
| 🤮 | 4 | 0.731% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 0.548% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.548% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.183% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.183% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 547 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2025 to 15 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I’ve created a new website called CanadaCulled.org where we will be documenting as many farmer abuse stories as possible. If possible, please leave a comment on the articles. This archive will be used as evidence of CFIA abuse and we are particularly interested in comments that share how watching the culls has affected you personally.
😢23🤬13👍2🙏2❤1
Two nights ago the ostriches in Edgewood BC were mass slaughtered by the Canadian Food Inspection Agency. The family had to sit in their homes and listen as 600 gunshots were fired to kill ~100 remaining birds. Birds that were as old as 35. Pets with names. The family will never be the same again.
🤬55😢20🤮4❤2💩2🙏1
I was poisoned by an antibiotic. Despite black box warnings, fluoroquinolone antibiotics like Cipro and Levaquin are still prescribed 14+ million times a year, harming millions. Many are left permanently disabled, in wheelchairs, or in their grave. This exposé dives into the science, the damage, and the staggering human cost. If my writing this (or your sharing it) helps even one person avoid these drugs, it’s we…
👍9😱3🤬1
SOS in Canada! We need help! We need really media coverage! Big podcasts, Joe Rogan, someone help us!! 🇨🇦🇨🇦🇨🇦
💯18🙏7❤1
Universal ostrich farm was researching natural antibody research on their farm. When ostriches produce antibodies, they transfer them into their very large eggs, which makes them very easy to research. The lab that was collaborating with the farm announced recently that they found natural antibodies that could treat aggressive viruses. That lab was then bought out. Now these ostriches are being culled despite a supre…
🤬33❤1
The Supreme Court of Canada ordered the CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) to stop culling the ostriches with a stay order but they continue to do it anyway and are dumping the dead bodies.
🤬26❤1
RCMP in Canada escorting the CFIA (Canadian Food Inspection Agency) to dump a large amount of dumpsters allegedly full of dead ostriches despite a stay order from the Supreme Court of Canada to halt the cull of the ostriches. The RCMP are intercepting anyone who tries to follow, pulling them over and preventing us from finding out where they are dumping the dead bodies. This is no joke.
🤬20😱5
🦤 ostrich farm update in Edgewood British Columbia Canada 🥚 The Supreme Court of Canada has granted a stay order to the ostrich farm, preventing the Canadian food inspection agency from culling the ostriches. However, the farmers have strong evidence to show that the CFIA is culling them anyway despite the court order. There are at least 100 missing ostriches from the 400 ostrich flock. There are also images of a po…
🤬25😱5
Do not allow the globalists to take away our farms!!!
👍22🙏8❤2👏1
Do not let Spirit die in vain!!! 🍁🦤
😢10😱9❤1
🇨🇦🇨🇦🍁🍁 🦤For my fellow Canadians - 400 ostriches in BC need our help to stay alive! We have a petition going to save the Canadian ostriches from the Canadian Food Inspection agency for their bogus claims about the ostriches carrying bird flu. And we need your signature NOW! SIGN HERE: https://www.ourcommons.ca/petitions/en/Petition/Details?Petition=e-6857 They refuse to test the ostriches and are threatening the far…
🙏10💔3❤1
After a days long battle, we saved the Ostriches on the Ostrich farm for now! They had already built a corral from straw bales and were ready to round them up and kill them but they got a court order that saved the ostriches until they go to Supreme Court. I think they will win in Supreme Court because the freedom protestors from the pandemic won in Supreme Court. I am so tired. I just spent the last few days calli…
❤42🙏15
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @covidvaxinjury. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Big Pharma Injuries” (@covidvaxinjury), 8,306 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/covidvaxinjury.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.