5 measurements spanning 35 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 217β226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:59
218
-4
9 Sept 2026, 18:00
222
-1
24 Aug 2026, 19:18
223
-1
16 Aug 2026, 15:14
224
-1
14 Aug 2026, 23:32
225
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 August 2025 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 34s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
Reaction mix
25 reactions across 4 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 25 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2025 to 2 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
halo guys ini amee/admin mau kasih info. kayesha lagi sakit dari minggu kemaren trs skrng masih pemulihan & blm sempet buat lanjut ngedit. tadi aku baru aja chat kayes di wa, hpnya jga lagi rusak. ditunggu aja ya guys, maaf kalian harus nunggu lama buat liat hasil covernya π₯²
ini yg udh rec tolong dicek lg, masih ada bbrp part yg blm direkam soalnya...part (you-u-u) sm ada 1 part tp ak lupa yg mana, intinya dicek aja dlu, ditunggu smpe bsok yups
Signed ππππ ππ ππππππ πΉ #VOTELEOWONXIN
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coveriny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@coveriny named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
@dearsyanna named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 β 15 August 2026
@lilflwie named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 β 15 August 2026
@lune_priss named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 β 15 August 2026
@skylaandd named in 1 post, 15 August 2026 β 15 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.