Channel
@courageclub
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry
139subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002395355402 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @courageclub |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 29 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 29 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/courageclub |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:25 | 139 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 13:48 | 137 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 139 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 137 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 137 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:30 | 136 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (28 May 2026 – 4 August 2026) |
| Views total | 81 |
| Reactions total | 6 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
57 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 27 | 47.4% | |
| ❤ | 20 | 35.1% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 8.77% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 May 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
مشکل رابطههای ما از جایی آغاز میشود که مرز میان تنهایی و درهمآمیختگی را گم میکنیم. اگر تنهایی را به عنوان بخشی از زندگی نپذیریم، فلسفهاش را ندانیم و شیوهی کنار آمدن با آن را نیاموزیم؛ یا برای فرار از تنهایی به تمامی به بخشی از دیگری بدل میشویم و یا او را به سطح ابزاری برای مقابله با تنهایی، پایین میآوریم. بهترین شکل رابطه آن است که در عین احساس تعلق، استقلالمان را حفظ کنیم. و کسی میتواند چنین رابطهی …
👍2
بزرگترین تهدید برای عشق، کمبود احساس نیست؛ بلکه باورهای غیرواقعبینانه ما درباره عشق است. عشق پایدار زمانی شکل میگیرد که آن را نه یک معجزه، بلکه مهارتی قابل یادگیری بدانیم آلن دوباتن
👏3👍1
محسن جعفری l باشگاه شهامت pinned a photo
شهامت یعنی از خواستههایت دفاع کنی، بدون اینکه بابت داشتن آنها احساس گناه کنی وقتی این را میگوییم منظور این نیست که همیشه به خواستهات برسی یا آن را به دیگران تحمیل کنی منظور این است که برای داشتن خواسته، خودت را سرزنش نکنی بسیاری از افراد، بهویژه زنانی که از کودکی تشویق شدهاند «فداکار»، «بیدردسر» یا «همیشه ملاحظهکار» باشند، وقتی نیازی دارند، قبل از بیان آن احساس گناه میکنند. مثلاً: - میخواهند زمانی را برای …
❤5
ترسهایی که در روابطمان داریم اما به روی خودمان نمیآوریم پشت بسیاری از دلخوریهای رابطه، یک ترس پنهان خوابیده است گاهی ساعتها با خودمان کلنجار میرویم که چرا از یک اتفاق کوچک اینقدر ناراحت شدهایم چرا دیر جواب دادن یک پیام اینقدر آزارمان داده؟ چرا یک جمله ساده تا چند روز ذهنمان را درگیر کرده؟ چرا از یک بیتوجهی کوچک، اینهمه دلخور شدهایم؟ ❗️شاید چون ماجرا فقط همان اتفاق نبوده است پشت خیلی از دلخوریها، یک ترس …
❤1
. ✽ شرایط اقتصادی که به هم میریزه آدما برای تامین نیازهای اولیهشون دچار نگرانی و تهدید میشن برای همین معمولا خیلی سریع نیازهای عاطفی و رابطهای رو میذارن کنار چون فکر میکنن *اولویت نیست* الان. ❗️اما همیشه هر درد بیرونی یا نگرانی و فشار کاری و روانی که پیش میاد، اولین جایی که بیشترین احتمال رو داره بتونه کمک بکنه به تغییر حال و انرژی ذهنی و بدنی، یک رابطه خوبه. صحبت کردن و همراهی آدمی که توی شرایط خوب و بد کن…
❤4🙏1
توی بحرانها و شرایط بد اقتصادی، چرا دعواها و اختلاف و دلخوری با همسر و پارتنرمون بیشتر میشه؟ براش چیکار میتونیم بکنیم؟ توی این ویس توضیح دادم 🔻🔻 [ رابطـــهی عاطفی در بحــــران ] @courageclub
🙏1
چرا آدمهای مهربان گاهی رابطههای ناجور دارند؟ خوشحال و سرخوش لیوانش رو برد بالا و با صدای بلند گفت سلامتی خانمم که مهربونترین زن دنیاست هیچ وقت به من نه نگفته همیشه حواسش به احساسات من هست خیلی خوب ازم مراقبت میکنه هیچ وقت وقتی من عصبانیام باهام بحث نمیکنه و من با شنیدن این حرفاش توی دلمگفتم بله همه اینا از بیرون شبیه مهربونیه اما این مهربانی، قراره آرومآروم به قیمت از دست دادن خودش براش تمام بشه مشکل، مهربو…
رابطههای خوب با عشق ساخته نمیشوند؛ با شهامت ساخته میشوند خیلی از آدمها همه چیز رو میذارن برای رابطهشون وقت میذارن، از خودشون میگذرن، مراقب احساسات طرف مقابلاند، تمام تلاششون رو میکنن که همه چیز خوب پیش بره... اما با همهی این عشق، یه روز به خودشون میان و میگن: نمیدونم چرا دیگه خودم نیستم!! چرا؟ چون عشق بهتنهایی رابطه رو نمیسازه شهامت هم لازمه شهامت اینکه بگی: این رفتار ناراحتم میکنه شهامت اینکه از خو…
👍3
رابطههای ضعیف فقط از کمبود عشق آسیب نمیبینند؛ اغلب از کمبود شهامت آسیب میبینند بیشتر آدمها وقتی درباره رابطه عاطفی خوب فکر میکنند، به عشق، صمیمیت، تفاهم یا احترام اشاره میکنند. اما یک عنصر کمتر دیدهشده وجود دارد که کیفیت رابطه را به شکل عمیقی تعیین میکند: شهامت ❗️شهامت در رابطه یعنی توانایی اینکه احساس واقعیات را بیان کنی خواستههایت را پنهان نکنی «نه» بگویی وقتی لازم است درباره ناراحتیها حرف بزنی، نه این…
👍3❤2
من چقدر خنگم... عجیبه که آدمها بعد از یک اشتباه، یک شکست یا یک تصمیم بد، خیلی سریع به این نتیجه میرسن که «من خنگم» در حالی که یک اشتباه، هوش شما رو اندازهگیری نمیکنه در روانشناسی به این خطا میگن تعمیم افراطی یعنی از یک اتفاق محدود، یک نتیجه کلی درباره خودت میگیری "اشتباه کردم" تبدیل میشه به "من ناتوانم" یا من اشتباهم!! "اینو بلد نبودم" تبدیل میشه به "من باهوش نیستم" یا " من خنگم حقیقتی که کمتر بهش فکر …
👍2❤1👏1
چرا بعضی زنها از فرستادن یه پیام ساده بیشتر از یه پروژهی پیچیده میترسن؟ یه تناقض جالب که زیاد میبینم: زنی که میتونه یه پروژهی بزرگ رو مدیریت کنه، گاهی برای فرستادن یه پیام ساده ساعتها درجا میزنه پیام رو مینویسه، پاک میکنه، دوباره مینویسه، دوباره میخونه، و بازم مطمئن نیست مسئله پیام نیست چرا؟ چون پیام قرار نیست فقط یه متن بفرسته. قراره یه بخشی از اونو آشکار کنه: درخواستش رو، نظرش رو، نارضایتیاش رو، یا م…
👍3❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @courageclub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 274,104 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
One URL this entry has put in its own public description, shown exactly as written there. A declaration, not a verified association— we measured that the description contained this text, and nothing more. It is not a claim that this entry owns, runs or is connected to whatever the link resolves to; a description is text anyone controls, and anyone can put anyone else’s URL into it. How this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محسن جعفری l باشگاه شهامت” (@courageclub), 139 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/courageclub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.