Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 152–158 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 06:17
155
+2
10 Sept 2026, 18:37
153
-1
2 Sept 2026, 00:26
154
-1
26 Aug 2026, 01:12
155
-2
18 Aug 2026, 08:52
157
+2
11 Aug 2026, 12:07
155
+1
11 Aug 2026, 00:16
154
first reading
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
13s
Average length
13s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 6 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 23.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🍓
15
23.1%
❤
14
21.5%
🎉
7
10.8%
custom 5303409021347198159
3
4.62%
custom 5219899700173368784
2
3.08%
custom 5303037300517662575
2
3.08%
custom 5415824997136507034
2
3.08%
custom 5452047445640913389
2
3.08%
custom 5452133237612655084
2
3.08%
💘
2
3.08%
custom 5244792523167134915
1
1.54%
custom 5251533899539970282
1
1.54%
custom 5273724492319841539
1
1.54%
custom 5303072261551450568
1
1.54%
custom 5303299667184874695
1
1.54%
custom 5310191878514185732
1
1.54%
custom 5341379719109551977
1
1.54%
custom 5344048921024930893
1
1.54%
custom 5346070489116737964
1
1.54%
custom 5348447087795143128
1
1.54%
4 further kinds
4
6.15%
Custom emoji. 16 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
😈😈😈😈 😈😈😈😈😈😈
Мои придурки 💜💜
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Приходить во время не интересно поэтому я долетела только через два часа после начала. И почти сразу же мы поехали в ПХ кушать т.к. все без завтрака 🌟
В итоге из программы я видела только дискотеку и награждениено ,но даже так могу сказать ,ребятки большие молодцы ,а пати вышло очень душевное 🌟
#пати #косплей #закос #no_moonday_party
🤩 🆎🔤😏🆎🆎
Угадай что за крафт получится из этих материалов 🌟
🌟Учитывай🌟 что этот крафт связан с косплеем из прошлого поста 🪸
Завтра утром будет разгадка с фотками результата🌟🌟
#интерактив
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
Мой просяк с аликом пока откладывается, тут новая песня:
гонять в +30 в пальто
🌟🌟
В общем я сдохну, но зато будет весело и до встречи на NoMoonDayParty или на сходке того же числа
#анонс #косплей
☆ CHAINSAW MAN ☆
Striving, future, a beautiful star
Striving, future, a beautiful star
Striving, future, a beautiful star
Striving, future, a beautiful star
Feel lucky — this laundry room is so clear today
So I may say my goodbye to this oil that is on me, stained
Who is that? Who is that?
Oh, it's just the voice that comes from within my head
"I want some of this"
"I want some of that"
Keep singing o…
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @cosplay_dla_shainikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Розовая пупырка” (@cosplay_dla_shainikov), 155 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosplay_dla_shainikov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
