Channel
@cosmoride_program
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
266subscribers
+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003919636618 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cosmoride_program |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 26 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cosmoride_program |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 266 | +3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 263 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:32 | 263 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 20 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (26 June 2026 – 20 July 2026) |
| Views total | 567 |
| Reactions total | 25 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 01:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
100 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 67.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 67 | 67.0% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 8.00% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 7.00% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 7.00% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 6.00% | |
| ⚡ | 4 | 4.00% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 100reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We’re looking for Study Buddies from Russia Our first learners come from the United States, India, the United Kingdom, Spain, Italy, Egypt, Turkey, Indonesia, countries across Africa, Central Asia, and Latin America. They all share one goal: to learn Russian, connect with native speakers, and discover more about Russian culture, education, and space. And if you’re reading this channel, you could be the person they …
❤10
🚀 CosmoRide has successfully completed its first open workshop for absolute beginners in Russian! Participants joined us with no previous knowledge of Russian and, by the end of the session, were already recognizing Cyrillic letters, reading their first words, counting in Russian, and using simple phrases through interactive space-themed activities. This workshop was especially important for us because it allowed C…
❤8
3 Russian words everyone should Know 🚀 Learning a new language becomes much more exciting when every word tells a story. As we continue exploring the historic Apollo–Soyuz Test Project, here are three Russian words that every space enthusiast should know. 🌌 1. Космос (kosmos) Meaning: Space During the Apollo–Soyuz mission, both American astronauts and Soviet cosmonauts worked together in космос, proving that spac…
❤5🔥2
Start learning Russian now! Join CosmoRide for a free online Russian workshop designed specifically for absolute beginners. No previous knowledge of Russian is required. If you're interested in languages, space, international collaboration, or simply want to learn something new, this workshop is for you. During this interactive session, you will: • learn the basics of the Cyrillic alphabet; • discover international…
❤6👍1🔥1
🚀 Another Crew, Another Handshake in Space Today, Soyuz MS-29 successfully docked with the International Space Station, bringing Roscosmos cosmonauts Pyotr Dubrov and Anna Kikina, together with NASA astronaut Anil Menon, to join the Expedition 74 crew aboard the ISS. For the next 261 days, they will live and work together in orbit, conducting 38 scientific experiments and advancing research that benefits all humani…
❤3
Who actually works in space?🚀 The space industry isn't just about rockets or astronauts anymore. It's a rapidly growing global ecosystem where technology, business, education, design, communications, and research all play a role. That's why the industry needs people with diverse skills: teachers, designers, journalists, project managers, researchers and many more. «Можно в космос» (@careerinspace_rus) is a media a…
❤3❤🔥2
A kind reminder: the workhop is TODAY! CosmoRide invites you to an interactive online workshop inspired by the Apollo–Soyuz mission — the historic 1975 handshake in orbit that proved trust and communication can bridge any divide. We'll explore its lessons and practice Russian through engaging conversations. Date: July 11 (today) Time: 19:00 Moscow time (12:00 PM EST) Format: Online via Zoom (you'll get the Zoom li…
🔥2
5 Leadership lessons from Apollo-Soyuz for teams In 1975, at the height of the Cold War, the Apollo-Soyuz mission proved that even competitors can achieve extraordinary results when united by a common goal. Nearly 50 years later, its lessons are just as relevant for modern teams and leaders. Apollo-Soyuz reminds us that great collaboration isn’t built on similarity-it’s built on communication, trust and a shared go…
❤6⚡4🔥2💯1🤝1
Join us for a unique workshop 🚀 On July 11, CosmoRide is hosting a special workshop for foreigners dedicated to one of the most inspiring pages in space history — the Apollo-Soyuz mission. In 1975, at the height of the Cold War, American and Soviet astronauts met in orbit and shook hands. What can this historic mission teach us about teamwork, leadership, and communication? We'll explore these questions together in…
❤8
A small gift can carry a very big message During the Apollo–Soyuz mission in 1975, American astronauts and Soviet cosmonauts exchanged symbolic gifts while orbiting Earth. The crews wanted to celebrate a successful mission and a new chapter of cooperation. Among the gifts were: 🔹A wooden plaque with mission emblems, representing friendship between the two 🔹Medallions created especially for the mission, symbols of t…
❤🔥6❤4
What if one handshake could change the future of space exploration? On July 15, 1975, something extraordinary happened above Earth. For the first time in history, an American Apollo spacecraft and a Soviet Soyuz spacecraft successfully docked in orbit, creating a bridge between two countries that had spent decades competing in the Space Race. The crew of two countries: Thomas Stafford, Vance Brand and Donald “Deke”…
❤14🤝6👍5
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @cosmoride_program. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 267,606 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CosmoRide” (@cosmoride_program), 266 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmoride_program.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.