Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CosmoBook

Channel

CosmoBook

@cosmobook_io

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

24subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001855257535
TypeChannel
Username@cosmobook_io
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 27 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cosmobook_io

Growth

247 August 2026 — 24 subscribers11 August 2026 — 24 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 10:3324no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:2124first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 27 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

39 reactions across 14 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1538.5%
🔥717.9%
615.4%
❤‍🔥37.69%
👍37.69%
🕊37.69%
😢25.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 March 2023 to 19 March 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Mar 2024, 18:25 UTC64 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://x.com/CosmoBook_io/status/1770154013410938950?s=20

🕊3

2 Dec 2023, 15:57 UTC94 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://x.com/CosmoBook_io/status/1730978009459704102?s=20

2

30 Oct 2023, 17:38 UTC175 viewsread 11 August 2026

https://twitter.com/CosmoBook_io/status/1718990395257086309?t=DIx2Wtl0n25h81LKXjpxNw&s=19

25 Oct 2023, 20:54 UTC141 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

https://x.com/CosmoBook_io/status/1717274445063376950?s=20

1

29 Sept 2023, 10:15 UTC584 viewsread 11 August 2026

Привет. CosmoBook завершает валидирование сети Rebus. Участники сети Rebus приняли решение сократить количество валидаторов в активсете. Теперь для валидирования необходимо не менее 1кк монет, при том, что нам было заделегировано около 300к. Попытки взаимодействия с командой проекта к успеху не привели. В данном случае, мы приняли решение не продолжать битву за активсет, поскольку это может привести к перетеканию уча

25 Aug 2023, 20:54 UTC187 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

ДРУЗЬЯ СПАСИБО! ❤️❤️❤️ Вместе с вами мы вышли в активный сет @nomicbtc! Сообщество – великая сила! 💪 Стейкайте $NOM вместе с нами! Поддержите КосмоБук! https://app.nomic.io/staking?validator=nomic1dnzukwt5p5zzf2p7k5hm057c9539t07tqcezre&modal=info Давайте делать CosmoBook вместе! Вы можете исправить неточности, либо дополнить статью с помощью Pull Request! Да, это касается любой статьи;) https://cosmobook.io/cosm

❤‍🔥31

24 Aug 2023, 21:23 UTC141 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Привет! Случилось. Nomic раздал дроп для стейкеров $ATOM $EVMOS $JUNO $KUJI $OSMO! Клейм тут: https://app.nomic.io/rewards CosmoBook в неактиве, но вы можете помочь выйти в активсет: https://app.nomic.io/staking?validator=nomic1dnzukwt5p5zzf2p7k5hm057c9539t07tqcezre&modal=info Читайте о Nomic в КосмоБуке: https://www.cosmobook.io/cosmobook/v/russian/readme/nomic

4

28 Jun 2023, 06:38 UTC629 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Duality: Новый DEX на Cosmos Duality – это DEX, который строится на CosmosHub в качестве третьей потенциальной зоны реплицированной безопасности (первой версии ICS), наравне с Neutron и Stride. Цель Duality – максимизировать полезность $ATOM. При этом создание собственного токена не планируется. Лед тронулся, предложение в космосхабе. Партнерство с Axelar для улучшения кросс-чейн коммуникации Duality объявило о па

👍1

22 Jun 2023, 20:46 UTC762 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Это был славный (вовсе нет) поход. 27.03.2023 мы запустили валика Secret и написали пафосный пост по этому поводу. Мы чувствовали вкус победы, ведь запуску предшествовала месячная возня по поиску и настройке сервера, общение с сапортом хостингов, переписка с командой и уточнение деталей. Много усилий было потрачено на взаимодействие с тимой и поиском возможности получения делегации (огромные средства находятся сейч

😢2👍1

22 Jun 2023, 10:56 UTC634 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

QUICKSILVER: Ликвидный стейкинг на IBC. Мейннет был запущен 16 декабря 2022. Давайте мы кратко объясним как это работает, и что интересного произошло в Quicksilver за последние пару месяцев. Как работает ликвидный стейкинг на Quicksilver? Стейкаете нативные монеты, получаете qAssets. Пока доступны четыре сети и четыре дериватива: ⚛️ qATOM 🍀 qOSMO 🪙 qREGEN 🪙 qSTARS Что делать с деривативами qAssets? 1. Купить, прода

1🔥1

17 Jun 2023, 21:08 UTC60 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @creeptah

Сапорт ё КосмоБук😍 https://wallet.keplr.app/chains/quicksilver?modal=validator&chain=quicksilver-2&validator_address=quickvaloper150fjce8p3j6j64axzjhhfz0exk4kda79z29hk7

17 Jun 2023, 21:08 UTC66 viewsread 11 August 2026

И снова, здравствуйте. Если Quick ($qck) стейкаете, то нас выбило из активсета. Кто-то дрогнул и вывел. Просьба ределигнуть приятному валидатору CosmoBook, чтобы мы и дальше были частью сети, а вы знали, что сделали хороший поступок. Ну и ущепните кореша, у которого есть qck. Пусть не ленится (ределигейт это богоугодное дело). Примерно на 500 баксов суммарно нужно. Выручайте. Хороших выходных.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cosmobook_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,052,554 of 1,481,502entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CosmoBook” (@cosmobook_io), 24 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cosmobook_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.