Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for COSCUP 公告頻道

Channel

COSCUP 公告頻道

@coscup

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

587subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001035603715
TypeChannel
Username@coscup
CreatedBetween 1 January 2016 and 31 October 2016— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/coscup

Growth

5715875797 August 2026 — 571 subscribers7 August 2026 — 571 subscribers8 August 2026 — 576 subscribers15 August 2026 — 587 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 8 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 569–589 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 06:05587+11
8 Aug 2026, 01:35576+5
7 Aug 2026, 10:48571no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:35571first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
51.6%
avg views ÷ 587 subscribers
Avg views / post
303
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (4 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,728
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:48 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC66 viewsread 7 August 2026

Looks like the weather's pretty unpredictable with the typhoon coming—don't forget to grab an umbrella before you head out! No biggie if you forget though, you can easily pick one up at any convenience store nearby. BTW, Taiwan actually makes amazing umbrellas! If you have some free time, check out a local umbrella shop. Getting a sturdy one that works for both wind and sun is super practical and makes a really cool

7 Aug 2026, 04:01 UTC181 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🏔️ 感謝玉山銀行成為 COSCUP x UbuCon Asia 2026 贊助夥伴,與開源社群一同探索金融科技的新高度! 金融科技的發展,需要 AI、資料、雲端與軟體工程等不同技術領域共同協作。玉山銀行智能金融處長期投入 AI 與數位金融應用,探索如何運用技術打造更智慧、更貼近使用者需求的金融服務。 在智能金融處中,兩大技術中心各自扮演重要角色: 🐻 智能應用中心 專注於將 AI 技術轉化為實際金融應用,結合生成式 AI、知識圖譜、智能理財、語音服務等技術,並透過資料分析探索更多智慧金融服務的可能。 🐱 智能系統中心 作為智慧金融服務背後的技術基礎,負責 ML 架構設計、平台建置與自動化流程,涵蓋 CI/CD、Data ETL、監控系統與雲端技術等面向,打造穩定可靠的技術環境。 想了解更多玉山銀行智能金融處的技術探索與團隊介紹: 📖 閱讀完整文章: https://s.coscup.org/esun26 感謝玉山

7 Aug 2026, 02:04 UTC185 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌱 感謝國泰金控成為 COSCUP x UbuCon Asia 2026 黃金級贊助夥伴! 開源的價值,不只在於技術共享,更在於建立開放、透明與協作的文化。面對金融科技快速發展,國泰金控持續探索如何將開源精神融入企業技術發展,打造更具韌性與創新能力的金融科技生態。 作為臺灣首間加入雲端原生運算基金會(CNCF)的金融業會員,國泰金控長期投入雲端原生與開源技術應用,透過「雲端優先」與「開源」策略,推動技術架構與開發文化持續演進。 從 Kubernetes、Helm、Argo CD 等雲原生技術,到生成式 AI、數據工程、MLOps 與 DevSecOps,國泰金控將開源技術融入金融服務場景,探索科技如何支撐更穩健、安全且具彈性的服務。 除了技術導入,國泰金控也持續推動企業內部的開源文化,透過技術交流、開源治理與社群參與,讓開放協作成為組織創新的重要力量。 2026 年,國泰金控連續第二年支持 COSCUP 開源人年會,並

7 Aug 2026, 00:04 UTC185 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤝 感謝 Nitra 成為 COSCUP x UbuCon Asia 2026 黃金級贊助夥伴! 開源社群重視開放、協作與分享,而技術創新的背後,也來自無數次實際嘗試與經驗累積。今年 COSCUP x UbuCon Asia 2026,很高興邀請 Nitra 加入,與社群夥伴交流 AI、FinTech 與軟體工程領域的實戰經驗。 Nitra 是一家專注於美國醫療產業的 FinTech 新創,致力於透過金融科技與 AI 技術,協助醫療院所降低營運成本、簡化行政流程,讓醫療人員能將更多時間投入病患照護。從支付、採購、庫存管理,到預約排程、保險資格驗證與病患溝通,Nitra 透過技術重新思考醫療產業中的繁瑣流程,打造更有效率的數位化工作環境。 不同於將海外團隊作為支援角色的模式,Nitra 從創立初期便將核心研發團隊設於台灣。Nitra Taiwan 團隊參與產品核心開發,涵蓋後端系統、前端體驗、內部工具與產品設計等面向,持續推

6 Aug 2026, 16:05 UTC196 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤝 感謝 IMA 資訊經理人協會 成為 COSCUP x UbuCon Asia 2026 黃金級贊助夥伴,與我們一起支持開源社群的發展! 開源的力量來自無數人的投入,不論是撰寫程式、維護專案、翻譯文件、分享知識,或是在社群中協助他人成長,每一份貢獻都在推動整個生態系持續前進。 長期關注 IT 人才培育、數位轉型與科技發展的 IMA,自 2023 年起發起 IT Matters Awards,透過公開表彰方式,鼓勵在 IT 人才發展、數位創新、社會影響力與開源領域持續投入的企業、團隊與個人,讓更多科技實踐與貢獻被看見。 今年邁入第四屆的 IT Matters Awards 2026,以「IT 的力量 Matters」為核心精神,並與《天下雜誌》「未來城市@天下」共同舉辦,持續發掘引領變革的指標典範。 除了鼓勵 AI 創新、數位轉型及人才友善職場,今年也持續設立「開源貢獻獎」,表彰對開源社群有實質且持續貢獻的個人,肯定長期

3 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC526 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌍 從「友善 Linux」桌面,到支撐全球運算的隱形架構。 目前擔任 Canonical Engineering Director 的 大人物Rex,將帶領大家探索 Ubuntu 的演進,以及 AI 時代背後的基礎架構 🚀 本場將聚焦: 🔧 Ubuntu 工程演進與 LTS 🧠 AI Tax 與硬體整合挑戰 📦 Inference Snaps 🌱 開源 AI 的未來 📅 8/8 09:30–10:15 📍 RB105 🔗 https://coscup.org/2026/track/512?session=WPRG3M --- 🌍 From a "friendly Linux" desktop to the invisible architecture powering the world's compute. Join Rex Tsai, Canonical Engineering Director, as he e

31 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC587 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡ COSCUP 2026 閃電秀須知公開! 📖 投稿方式、流程與注意事項: 🔗 https://s.coscup.org/lightningtalk26 ⏱️ 3 分鐘一到,你的畫面就會被無情卡掉。但別害怕,迎接你的有全場會眾們的熱烈掌聲! 👏 — ⚡ COSCUP 2026 Lightning Talks Guidelines Released! 📖 Submission details, process, and guidelines: 🔗 https://s.coscup.org/lightningtalk26 ⏱️ Once the 3-minute timer runs out, your screen will be cut off without mercy. But don’t worry — what awaits you is the enthusiastic applause from the

28 Jul 2026, 15:35 UTC395 viewsread 7 August 2026

不知道大家有沒有跟上前陣子 NASA 太空人 林琪兒(Kjell Lindgren) 訪台帶起的太空熱潮? 看過電影《關鍵少數》(Hidden Figures)的人都知道,每一次耀眼的升空背後,最核心的力量往往來自於幕後那些計算軌跡、編寫控制邏輯的程式與數學靈魂。火箭再強大,沒有精準的「大腦」也無法飛向目標。這次,換你來體驗成為幕後關鍵推手的熱血! 國家太空中心(TASA)與陽明交通大學前瞻火箭研究中心(ARRC)合作推出「火箭導控軟體競賽(Balloon Popping Challenge)」工作坊,帶你深入探索火箭背後的 GNC(導航、導引與控制)技術,用程式碼打造火箭的「大腦」! 🛠️ 工作坊亮點 * 實戰技術模擬:使用 Gymnasium 訓練環境與 ActiveRocketPy 模擬系統(基於開源專案 RocketPy),挑戰火箭推力向量控制(TVC),並克服陣風、感測器雜訊等真實飛行環境情境。 * Be a U

22 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC597 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🤖 從 Taiwan-LLM 到 Audio LLM,林彥廷一路走進 AI 研究前線。 作為 Taiwan-LLM 的核心貢獻者之一,他投入繁體中文開源 LLM 的建立,推動更多人參與中文 AI 的研究與應用。如今,他的研究聚焦於 Audio LLM、Post-training 與 Speech Generation Controllability。 🎤 這場分享將帶你回顧 Taiwan-LLM 的開源歷程,以及他從開源社群走向 AI 研究的經驗與觀察。 📅 Day 2|2026/08/09 🕘 09:10–09:40 —- 🤖 From Taiwan-LLM to Audio LLMs, Yenting Lin has been at the forefront of open-source AI and research. A key contributor to Taiwan-LLM, he helped ad

17 Jul 2026, 13:28 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🚨 且慢!票亭尚未推倒!我們仍須努力 💪 相信剛剛有不少朋朋在搶票時,發現票亭突然消失了,還以為自己錯過、沒上車了 😱🚍 別緊張~不是票亭倒了!😂 只是小啄太久沒用票亭,不小心把它收起來了,現在已經重新推出來啦!🎉 剛剛還沒來得及推倒票亭的朋朋,歡迎再回來挑戰一次 💥🗳️ 一起把票亭推倒吧!🙌

16 Jul 2026, 11:55 UTC670 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Python 核心開發者、pdb 負責人、Apache Spark Committer——人眼 Review 非物質文化遺產傳承人、Bilibili UP 主——高天! 一起來聽高天分享他十年的開源旅程: ✨ 為什麼要參與開源? ✨ 該如何開始? 從第一次提交 PR,到成為核心貢獻者,一起探索踏入開源世界的道路。 Python Core Developer, pdb maintainer, and Apache Spark Committer — the legendary “Human Eye Code Reviewer” and Bilibili creator, Tian Gao! Join Tian as he shares his 10-year open-source journey: ✨ Why contribute? ✨ How to get started? From his first PRs to

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coscup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 449,627 of 1,604,161entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q10846717 on Wikidata, read 23 August 2026
LabelCOSCUP
Descriptionannual conference held by Taiwanese Open source community
X / Twitter@coscup
Official sitehttp://coscup.org/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“COSCUP 公告頻道” (@coscup), 587 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coscup.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.