Внимание, проводим крайне важный опрос!
🥰193❤57🕊17💋9❤🔥8👍3💘1
Signed Воронье Гнездо колл-центр

Channel
@corvids_nest
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
10,525subscribers
+40 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001676357416 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @corvids_nest |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/corvids_nest |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 10,525 | +3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 10,522 | +12 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 10,510 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:21 | 10,496 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 10,493 | +9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 10,484 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:46 | 10,485 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (3 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 19,320 |
| Reactions total | 2,971 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
2,971 reactions across 9 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,697 | 57.1% | |
| custom 5298769447350182043 | 337 | 11.3% | |
| 🥰 | 202 | 6.80% | |
| 🙏 | 125 | 4.21% | |
| ❤🔥 | 94 | 3.16% | |
| 💔 | 88 | 2.96% | |
| 👍 | 76 | 2.56% | |
| custom 5271913686863208405 | 73 | 2.46% | |
| custom 5325754795590426980 | 71 | 2.39% | |
| 🔥 | 60 | 2.02% | |
| 🕊 | 60 | 2.02% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 0.64% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 0.572% | |
| 💋 | 9 | 0.303% | |
| 😭 | 9 | 0.303% | |
| 🤔 | 7 | 0.236% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 0.202% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.168% | |
| 🍓 | 4 | 0.135% | |
| 🤩 | 4 | 0.135% | |
| 5 further kinds | 8 | 0.269% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,971reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @corvids_nest. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Внимание, проводим крайне важный опрос!
🥰193❤57🕊17💋9❤🔥8👍3💘1
Signed Воронье Гнездо колл-центр
Какие ласточки более милые?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🕊41custom 527191368686320840511🤔7👍4❤3
Signed Воронье Гнездо колл-центр
"Почему вы не разводите корм самостоятельно? Поставьте несколько клеток с мышами и будет вам счастье. А тараканы вообще сами разводятся!". Продолжим неприятную тему кормления птиц 👹 И начнем с подсчетов. Сейчас в день обитатели реабилитационного центра съедают +-700 цыплят. Возьмем самых крутых кур, которые несутся на износ что-то типа два дня из трех. Итого для получения 700 яиц в день нам надо около 1000 кур-несу…
❤251custom 529876944735018204348custom 527191368686320840534🔥21💯17👍15👏15❤🔥5
Signed Воронье Гнездо колл-центр
Птичкины портреты от Шуры ❤ Птичьи Портреты 15х10 | кар. кар. акр. | 2026 Благотворительная распродажа в поддержку центра "Воронье Гнездо". Любой птичий портрет - 3.000 (три тысячи) рублей. Встреча в центре г.Тверь. Пересыл в другой город Почтой или ТК СДЭК за счет получателя. По всем вопросам, как обычно, пишите Сергею Наши соц. сети: https://vk.com/corvids_nest https://t.me/corvids_nest https://dzen.ru/corvids…
❤190custom 529876944735018204343🔥35👍17❤🔥11🤩4💘3🦄1
Signed Воронье Гнездо
Знаете, что такое закон подлости? Это когда в пик сезона птенцов хищных птиц ты остаешься без еды для хищных птиц. Питание хищников вообще вызывает немало негатива, поэтому мы стараемся обходить эту тему стороной, насколько возможно. Но факт в том, что соколы, ястребы и совы не кушают радугу. В летний сезон для растущих малышей закупаются кормовые грызуны - наиболее полноценный, но при этом и самый дорогой вид питан…
❤224💔50🙏39custom 529876944735018204317👍5👌3custom 53257547955904269803🕊2
Signed Воронье Гнездо
Однажды руководитель фонда умрет в мучениях за свои регулярные попытки впихнуть невпихуемое. Ну представьте, вы как приличный человек просите записать на осмотр пару птиц за недельку до приемного дня. Потом в "Гнездо" неожиданно приезжает пациент со сломанным крылом. И еще один с распухшим глазом. И еще один с истощением. И еще в "детском саду" кто-то из птенцов заболел. И вот груженый убогими птицами обоз направляе…
❤285custom 529876944735018204363❤🔥27🙏19💔13👍12custom 53257547955904269807custom 52719136868632084055
Signed Воронье Гнездо
Какие аисты вам больше нравятся: черно-белые или бело-черные? 😁 Белый аист - массовый вид, который к тому же очень любит селиться рядом с человеком. Поэтому обращений по этим птицам каждый год предостаточно - они попадают под автомобили, травмируются на ЛЭП, раньше времени вываливаются из гнезда (иногда им в этом помогают сами сородичи). Черные аисты предпочитают уединение. Их выбор - удаленные от цивилизации терри…
❤232custom 532575479559042698037custom 527191368686320840523custom 529876944735018204319❤🔥15👍7👏3🥰3
Signed Воронье Гнездо
Какие-то тяжёлые дни последнее время. Надеялись, что к концу лета нагрузка будет снижаться, но, кажется, в работе просто сместились акценты 😅 И теперь вместо кучи птенцов у нас куча больных и травмированных птиц. Вчера ездили с нашими подопечными на прием к врачам Госпиталя дикой природы. К сожалению, далеко не все травмы можно починить, и далеко не каждую птицу можно с ходу положить не операционный стол. Например,…
❤231custom 529876944735018204361🙏51💔25❤🔥18😭9custom 53257547955904269804👍1
Signed Воронье Гнездо
В альтернативной версии "Винни-Пуха" без хвоста остался вовсе не ослик... Впрочем, у сов, как и у других птиц, все перья имеют срок годности. В какой-то момент хвост просто обязан потеряться, чтобы на его месте вырос новый. С течением времени любые перья сильно изнашиваются, так что ни одна птица не смогла бы пользоваться единственным комплектом всю свою жизнь. На линьку влияет множество факторов, включая возраст пт…
❤224custom 529876944735018204386custom 532575479559042698019👍12🙏12❤🔥10🥰6😢3
Signed Воронье Гнездо
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @corvids_nest. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Какие ласточки более милые?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 18,784 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“"Воронье Гнездо" - помощь птицам” (@corvids_nest), 10,525 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/corvids_nest.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.