5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -9. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,639–4,650 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 21:58
4,640
-2
10 Aug 2026, 08:40
4,642
-4
7 Aug 2026, 17:24
4,646
-3
7 Aug 2026, 06:45
4,649
no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:33
4,649
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 4,640 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,280
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
12 (26 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
15,335
Reactions total
917
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
917 reactions across 12 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
501
54.6%
😁
228
24.9%
🔥
137
14.9%
😍
43
4.69%
👍
8
0.872%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 917reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Джек-рассел-терьер Джесси на профилактическом осмотре в "Биоконтроле".
Напоминаем, что своевременная диагностика продлевает жизнь вашего питомца и улучшает её качество.
Как часто нужно проводить диспансеризацию своему животному?
С 7 до 10 лет - 1раз в год. После 10 лет раз в 6 - 8 месяцев.
Как помочь питомцу в жару?
Лето - не самое простое время года для наших питомцев.
Делимся с вами памяткой о том, как помочь своему другу в жару:
• Если вы оставляете животное дома на целый день, лучше всего оборудовать окна сетками-антикошками и оставить окна открытыми.
• Также можно рассмотреть вариант установки кондиционера. Выставляйте комфортную температуру 23 - 25 градусов, чтобы животное не переохладилось.
• …
Так вот ты какой - попугай средней полосы))
Обыкновенных сорок принято называть черно-белыми. Издалека сорочью красоту действительно непросто разглядеть, но при ближайшем рассмотрении нельзя остаться равнодушным к этим переливам перьев. Кстати, такой металлический блеск характерен не только для сорок, но и для других врановых птиц - например, грачей и воронов.
Маленькие сорочатки невероятно милы и неизменно пользую…
🩺🐻 Бурый медведь на уникальном обследовании в Москве
В ветеринарный центр на Каширском шоссе привезли бурого медведя Кузю из Красноярска. У него отнялись задние лапы. Перед процедурой ему сделали наркоз, чтобы снизить стресс. Ветеринары провели УЗИ, МРТ, КТ и взяли кровь.
По одной из версий, причина — инсульт. Медведю 30 лет, 15 — Кузя жил в клетке у придорожного кафе, откуда его забрал приют «Земля Прайда». Перелё…
Котята Тигруша и Плюша после повторного приёма терапевта Анастасии Сергеевны Новосёловой.
После проведения всех манипуляций пациентов вкусно накормили и они взяли перерыв на сладкий сон 🛌
Птенцы ласточек - одни из самых милых и приставучих певчих детей. Пока малыши сидят по коробочкам, они могут требовать еды и внимания только голодным писком. Но стоит им повзрослеть и переехать в вольер, как ситуация резко меняется, и не в пользу волонтеров.
Большинство наших птенцов избаловано вниманием, поэтому они действуют по принципу "гора не идет к Магомеду". И вот сидит на ветке какой-нибудь зяблик или синичк…
❤67
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @BiocontrolVet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 719,516 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
0
vacant every time we have ever looked
@BiocontrolVet named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@tvrussia1 named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026 · confirmed gone 9 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ветклиника "Биоконтроль"” (@BiocontrolVet), 4,640 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BiocontrolVet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.