Channel
@coresageofficial
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
846subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003683474876 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coresageofficial |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 18 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coresageofficial |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 17:26 | 846 | -3 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 849 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (18 May 2026 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,783 |
| Reactions total | 44 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
180 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 79 | 43.9% | |
| 🔥 | 36 | 20.0% | |
| 👍 | 21 | 11.7% | |
| 👏 | 18 | 10.0% | |
| 🤯 | 13 | 7.22% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 3.33% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 1.11% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.556% | |
| 🙊 | 1 | 0.556% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 May 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Another milestone. Another reminder of how far we've come. Just a few months ago, we celebrated crossing 100K+ CORE distributed. Today, CoreSage has surpassed: 16,000+ participants 756,000+ CORE distributed 219,000+ CORE in the active reward pool From 100K to 756K+ in just a few months. And now, 1,000,000 CORE distributed is firmly within sight. This growth isn't the result of a single moment. It's the result …
❤3🔥3🤯2
🔶WHY MANY PEOPLE PREFER CORESAGE In crypto, many people spend months chasing the next airdrop... Complete tasks. Invite friends. Wait for months. ...only to receive little or nothing. 🔶CoreSage takes a different approach. ✅ You know what you're building. ✅ You claim rewards daily. ✅ Referral bonuses are paid directly to your wallet. ✅ Spillovers strengthen your matrix. ✅ Your earnings are tied to your activity a…
❤6🔥3👌1👏1
15,000+ Participants. Another milestone. Another statement. Markets move in cycles. Fear comes. Liquidity leaves. Prices fluctuate. But history has always shown that the greatest wealth transfer happens during periods when most people lose conviction. While the charts turned red, our community kept growing. Today we're proud to celebrate: 🟠 15K+ Participants 🟠 676K+ CORE Distributed 🟠 217K+ CORE in the Active R…
❤4🔥2
🔶 SOME PEOPLE ARE STILL WAITING FOR CORESAGE TO BE A SCAM. Meanwhile, more than 6 months have passed. Those who took action early have been: • Claiming daily • Building teams • Receiving spillovers • Earning referral bonuses directly to their wallets • Accumulating hundreds of CORE 🔶 When CORE's value increases in the future, the CORE accumulated today will become significantly more valuable. Opportunities don't…
❤9👍2🤯2💯1
14,000+ Participants. Another milestone. Another step forward. From a small community with a shared vision to 14,000+ participants building together on the CORE blockchain, the growth continues because of every member who believes in what we're creating. Today, CoreSage has reached: 🔶 14,000+ Participants 🔶 591,000+ CORE Distributed 🔶 203,000+ CORE in the Active Reward Pool Every milestone reflects real particip…
👏4❤1
🔶 ONE DECISION CAN CHANGE EVERYTHING. Every successful CoreSage member once had the same choice: "Should I wait... or should I start?" Those who waited are still watching. 🔶 Those who acted are: - Claiming daily - Upgrading levels - Building teams - Receiving spillovers - Growing their CORE holdings The difference wasn't luck. It was a decision. Your future in CoreSage won't be determined by when you joined. …
❤5👏2🔥2
13,000+ Participants. 🎉 Another milestone. Another chapter in the CoreSage journey. What started with a small group of early believers has grown into a thriving on-chain ecosystem powered by community and secured by the CORE blockchain. Today we've reached: 🔶 13,000+ Participants 🔶 464,000+ CORE Distributed 🔶 237,000+ CORE in the Active Reward Pool Every wallet, every transaction, and every participant has helped…
🔥8❤6
💰 WHY UPGRADING MATTERS IN CORESAGE Every position that belongs to you in X3 or X6 pays according to your active level. Level 1 → 20 CORE Level 2 → 40 CORE Level 3 → 80 CORE Level 4 → 161 CORE Level 5 → 322 CORE Level 6 → 644 CORE Level 7 → 1,289 CORE Level 8 → 2,578 CORE Level 9 → 5,156 CORE Think about it... That's why upgrading is so important. Higher levels don't just unlock more opportunities—they multiply …
❤6🔥5
🔶 12,000+ PARTICIPANTS 🔶 Another milestone. Another reminder of how far this community has come. Today CoreSage has surpassed: • 12,000+ Participants • 394,000+ CORE Distributed • 246,000+ CORE in the Active Reward Pool What started with a small group of believers has grown into one of the fastest-growing communities on CORE. Every participant. Every transaction. Every milestone. Built together. The growth has…
🔥3❤1
🔶 SOME OF YOU STILL DON'T UNDERSTAND WHY LEVEL 7 MATTERS. Being on Level 7 and above in both X3 and X6 isn't just about having a higher level. It's about protecting your position. Here's why: • You avoid blocked earnings when your matrix advances. • You remain eligible for spillovers flowing through those levels. • You capture more of the network activity happening above and below you. • You position yourself for …
❤5👍4
🔶YOU ASKED FOR AN ONLINE OPPORTUNITY. An opportunity where you could capitalize on your cryptocurrency knowledge, exercise your online skills, earn income on your own schedule, and create a more comfortable life. What if the answer wasn't something you had to keep searching for? What if it was the opportunity now sitting right in front of you? CoreSage gives you the chance to: • Claim daily • Earn from referrals …
👍5❤2🥰2
11,000+ Participants! Another milestone. Another reminder of what a committed community can build together. CoreSage has now grown to 11,000+ participants, with: 243,000+ CORE in the active reward pool. 318,000+ CORE distributed on-chain. Over 10,900 reward recipients. From our earliest days to today, every milestone has been powered by the community and secured by the CORE blockchain. The numbers are growing, b…
❤7😱2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coresageofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 301,561 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CORESAGE OFFICIAL SMART CONTRACT” (@coresageofficial), 846 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coresageofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.