Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Coracist

Channel

Coracist

@coracist

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

834subscribers

+58 since we began measuring on 17 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004238816039
TypeChannel
Username@coracist
CreatedBetween 1 May 2026 and 14 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded17 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/coracist

Topic

Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

776839807.517 August 2026 — 776 subscribers18 August 2026 — 785 subscribers24 August 2026 — 836 subscribers1 September 2026 — 824 subscribers9 September 2026 — 811 subscribers19 September 2026 — 801 subscribers4 October 2026 — 830 subscribers13 October 2026 — 839 subscribers20 October 2026 — 837 subscribers28 October 2026 — 832 subscribers4 November 2026 — 834 subscribers83417 August 20264 November 2026
11 measurements spanning 78 days, net +58. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 767–848 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 01:19834+2
28 Oct 2026, 21:27832-5
20 Oct 2026, 21:41837-2
13 Oct 2026, 22:58839+9
4 Oct 2026, 04:19830+29
19 Sept 2026, 02:18801-10
9 Sept 2026, 16:20811-13
1 Sept 2026, 00:25824-12
24 Aug 2026, 20:57836+51
18 Aug 2026, 03:52785+9
17 Aug 2026, 17:16776first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 50s
Average length
2m 50s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,931 reactions across 20 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣1,55017.4%
🔥1,49116.7%
💩1,46616.4%
🤮92310.3%
😭6327.08%
❤6106.83%
🖕6076.80%
😐3994.47%
👎2092.34%
🥱1922.15%
😱1812.03%
💯1771.98%
👍1651.85%
🗿951.06%
🤨510.571%
👏370.414%
🤡350.392%
🤷230.258%
🤪150.168%
🍌140.157%
12 further kinds590.661%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,931 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC442 views63 reactionsread 17 August 2026

dan soal kemiripan lagu lagu cortis dengan karya musisi lain. menurut gua masalahnya bukan sekadar ada kemiripan atau tidak, melainkan seberapa besar kemiripan tersebut dan bagaimana pihak terkait meresponsnya. dalam industri musik, kemiripan memang bisa terjadi. genre yang sama sering kali memiliki pola drum, flow, struktur, atau gaya produksi yang mirip. karna itu kemiripan saja tidak otomatis membuktikan plagiari…

❤20🗿12👎10🔥6🥴6😭3🙉2🍌1

17 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC466 views50 reactionsread 17 August 2026

hal yang sama berlaku untuk kontroversi lain yang sering dibahas, Soal Coca-Cola dan Red Bull, kritik yang muncul biasanya bukan semata-mata karna produknya terlihat atau dipromosikan, melainkan karna kedua brand tersebut dikaitkan oleh sebagian orang dengan gerakan boikot tertentu. karna cortis adalah publik figur dengan audiens yang besar, sebagian orang berpendapat bahwa mereka dan tim di belakang mereka seharusn…

🤮13❤12💩7🔥6👎5🗿4🤷2😱1

17 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC488 views70 reactionsread 17 August 2026

akhir akhir ini rame, soal pembahasan "Cortis dijadikan kambing hitam", ya menurut gua karna ada sedikit benarnya. banyak diskusi tentang Black culture di K-pop yang akhirnya selalu berpusat pada cortis, padahal isu ini sudah ada jauh sebelum mereka debut dan jelas tidak berhenti hanya pada mereka. tapi, mengakui bahwa cortis mungkin mendapat sorotan yang lebih besar tidak otomatis membuat semua kritik terhadap merek…

🔥30🤮16🗿10💩5👎4🤨3❤2

15 Aug 2026, 08:25 UTC≈18,800 views1,477 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Gua nggak pakai tiktok sebagai sumber fakta utama. Gua pake tiktok buat ngumpulin reaksi, opini, dan diskusi publik soal isu ini. Yang gua tunjukin adalah adanya perdebatan dan kritik yang memang sudah beredar, bukan menjadikan setiap video tiktok sebagai bukti mutlak. Kalau ngomong soal opini publik atau respons komunitas, media sosial memang salah satu tempat yang relevan untuk melihatnya. Tapi tentu opini publik d…

💩613🤮272❤199🖕149🤣83💯50🔥33🗿29

15 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC≈18,900 views679 reactionsread 17 August 2026
Video

VIDEO BY @jasminedepqua ON TIKTOK.

😱180🤮118🤣100💩78🥱68🖕46❤37🔥17

15 Aug 2026, 07:16 UTC≈19,300 views954 reactionsread 17 August 2026

Pada akhirnya, semua yang gua tulis di atas adalah opini dan kritik pribadi gua terkait cultural appropriation, rasisme, dan penghargaan terhadap karya kreator lain. Gua nggak mengharapkan semua orang setuju, karena setiap orang punya sudut pandang masing-masing. Kalau ada penyampaian yang terlalu keras atau emosional, gua minta maaf. Fokus gua tetap pada isu dan tindakan yang dibahas, bukan untuk mengajak hate terha…

🤣404💩176🤮128❤77👎67🔥32👏21🗿18

15 Aug 2026, 06:28 UTC≈19,500 views488 reactionsread 17 August 2026

komen bebas bebas dah disini, terserah, tapi kondusif

🤣262🤮82💩58🔥20❤15🖕14🤷13👎11

15 Aug 2026, 06:07 UTC≈19,700 views362 reactionsread 17 August 2026

ini masih banyak, cari aja sendiri, jangan minta di suapin terus ya mamah mamah papah papah nya bayi bayi kortis

🖕127🔥84😭47💩37🤮25👎11🥱10😐7

15 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈19,300 views574 reactionsread 17 August 2026

"ga usah ngomong kasar juga lah" yaudah ga usah ngebayi bayiin idol, fair enough

🔥247😐96🖕67🤣60💯33🤮21❤17💩17

15 Aug 2026, 06:05 UTC≈19,300 views1,233 reactionsread 17 August 2026

CW // TW HARSHWORDS stop saying mereka masih bayi, mereka dh jmbt an cok.

😭559😐281💩161🖕57🔥47🥱36👎35💯26

15 Aug 2026, 06:03 UTC≈19,000 views308 reactionsread 17 August 2026

basi bat itu gua denger "mereka masih bayi" / "mereka kan anak anak" / "jangan gituin bayi" / "mereka ga ngerti apa apa" blok, ya pilihan mereka mau jadi publik figur di umur segitu, gak ada yang larang memang, tapi tanggung jawab nya berat. udah berapa idol yang bilang mereka capek jadi idol karna jadi idol sesusah itu, dan mereka masih kecil udah debut. seharusnya ada jg yang bantu nge didik & ngebimbing mereka, ya…

🔥145🤣56🖕46💩36❤11💯7😭3🕊2

15 Aug 2026, 05:53 UTC≈18,200 views259 reactionsread 17 August 2026

They themselves chose to become PUBLIC FIGURES, where public figures have to accept a lot of criticism and they cannot freely express themselves in public. they also need to be aware of other things, including the culture they're using. they're not just kids who just use things without asking questions; they've definitely done some research. If you don't accept criticism from fans, then you don't need to be a public …

🔥129🥱42💩22❤18🤮17🖕15🤣7💯4

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coracist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Coracist” (@coracist), 834 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coracist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.