Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CoolCoconut Tips

Channel

CoolCoconut Tips

@coolcoconut123

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

374subscribers

-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001296277893
TypeChannel
Username@coolcoconut123
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/coolcoconut123

Growth

3743863806 August 2026 — 386 subscribers6 August 2026 — 386 subscribers14 August 2026 — 384 subscribers20 August 2026 — 381 subscribers28 August 2026 — 379 subscribers6 September 2026 — 374 subscribers6 August 20266 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 372–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 18:54374-5
28 Aug 2026, 06:54379-2
20 Aug 2026, 07:38381-3
14 Aug 2026, 04:18384-2
6 Aug 2026, 20:17386no change
6 Aug 2026, 12:38386first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 17 March 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

13 Jun 2026, 13:05 UTC97 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Is there any interest in a reboot of the main group chat?

  1. No0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Jun 2024, 07:47 UTC570 viewsread 6 August 2026

This channel turns 7 years old today, if this was a child, it would be dead because this channel is neglected. Anyway, I hope you all are doing well and looking forward to the euros. This year is could be anyone!

22 Oct 2023, 11:07 UTC849 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Odds @170 but I've taken these as a treble. I am sure they are "safer" alternatives such as BTTS in the Villa game or Over 1.5 Girona goals. ✅Trebles comes in with Aston Villa, Girona and Clermont all doing their bit

20 Oct 2023, 10:11 UTC624 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Some sound reasoning for these matches and with Dortmund v Bremen Over 2.5 Goals coming at pretty shit odds. Anyway, the above options and the Dortmund Over 2.5 as a 5-fold comes in at around @30 odds. I haven't done this in a while and I quite fancied putting something up, let's see how many of the 5 I can get. I got 2/4

20 Oct 2023, 10:09 UTC437 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿League Two Double 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 BTTS @2.6 A goal for each team is possible, all four sides are shit, conceding regularly and often managing a goal per game. Newport managed at least a goal in all their home games so far with only the 1 clean sheet. Walsall can't keep a clean sheet away and got thumped by bottom side Sutton 4-0 last weekend. Tranmere have only failed to score once at home in 7 with 5 of those gam

20 Oct 2023, 10:03 UTC299 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🇪🇸La Liga 🇪🇸 Granada Over 1.5 Team Goals @3.60 Both teams concede a lot but Granada seem to score quite often. 5 of their 9 have had at least two Granada goals (most recently against Barcelona). Osasuna have conceded at least twice in 5 of their games too. Over 2.5 or BTTS is a good option if you're playing an acca. ❌

20 Oct 2023, 09:58 UTC290 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿Championship 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Ipswich Win to Nil @2.55 The risk here is Rotherham have scored in all their 5 home games... but Ipswich are playing some really good football. Game could also be postponed as the weather in the north of the UK is heavy rain and wind. ♻️Game postponed

11 Aug 2023, 09:43 UTC411 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://fantasy.premierleague.com/leagues/auto-join/70pb16 Ahead of the new season

16 Jun 2023, 16:17 UTC491 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/14axob9/calladine_after_an_outstanding_season_newcastle/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1 Howay the lads

8 Jun 2023, 11:16 UTC515 viewsread 6 August 2026

Happy birthday to this channel even though it’s practically dead. I think about 5 or 6 years ago it was created and it reached heights of 1800 members, oh how times have changed. I hope you are doing well and are gambling responsibly and winning lots. I may post football news sometime going forward since I barely bet on football nowadays. Coco 🥥

17 Mar 2023, 23:17 UTC627 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Napoli or Benfica, Feyenoord or Sporting & AZ or Fiorentina are dark horses left in my opinion.

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @coolcoconut123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Jun 2026, 13:05 UTCFinal Results26 voters

Is there any interest in a reboot of the main group chat?

  1. No0%

Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2023 to 13 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoolCoconut Tips” (@coolcoconut123), 374 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coolcoconut123.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.