Is there any interest in a reboot of the main group chat?
- No0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@coolcoconut123
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
374subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001296277893 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coolcoconut123 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coolcoconut123 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 18:54 | 374 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:54 | 379 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 381 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:18 | 384 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 386 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 386 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 17 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Is there any interest in a reboot of the main group chat?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
9 years old wow
This channel turns 7 years old today, if this was a child, it would be dead because this channel is neglected. Anyway, I hope you all are doing well and looking forward to the euros. This year is could be anyone!
Odds @170 but I've taken these as a treble. I am sure they are "safer" alternatives such as BTTS in the Villa game or Over 1.5 Girona goals. ✅Trebles comes in with Aston Villa, Girona and Clermont all doing their bit
Some sound reasoning for these matches and with Dortmund v Bremen Over 2.5 Goals coming at pretty shit odds. Anyway, the above options and the Dortmund Over 2.5 as a 5-fold comes in at around @30 odds. I haven't done this in a while and I quite fancied putting something up, let's see how many of the 5 I can get. I got 2/4
🏴League Two Double 🏴 BTTS @2.6 A goal for each team is possible, all four sides are shit, conceding regularly and often managing a goal per game. Newport managed at least a goal in all their home games so far with only the 1 clean sheet. Walsall can't keep a clean sheet away and got thumped by bottom side Sutton 4-0 last weekend. Tranmere have only failed to score once at home in 7 with 5 of those gam…
🇪🇸La Liga 🇪🇸 Granada Over 1.5 Team Goals @3.60 Both teams concede a lot but Granada seem to score quite often. 5 of their 9 have had at least two Granada goals (most recently against Barcelona). Osasuna have conceded at least twice in 5 of their games too. Over 2.5 or BTTS is a good option if you're playing an acca. ❌
🏴Championship 🏴 Ipswich Win to Nil @2.55 The risk here is Rotherham have scored in all their 5 home games... but Ipswich are playing some really good football. Game could also be postponed as the weather in the north of the UK is heavy rain and wind. ♻️Game postponed
https://fantasy.premierleague.com/leagues/auto-join/70pb16 Ahead of the new season
https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/14axob9/calladine_after_an_outstanding_season_newcastle/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=ioscss&utm_content=1&utm_term=1 Howay the lads
Happy birthday to this channel even though it’s practically dead. I think about 5 or 6 years ago it was created and it reached heights of 1800 members, oh how times have changed. I hope you are doing well and are gambling responsibly and winning lots. I may post football news sometime going forward since I barely bet on football nowadays. Coco 🥥
Napoli or Benfica, Feyenoord or Sporting & AZ or Fiorentina are dark horses left in my opinion.
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @coolcoconut123. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Is there any interest in a reboot of the main group chat?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2023 to 13 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CoolCoconut Tips” (@coolcoconut123), 374 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coolcoconut123.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.