Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CONTRA CHRIST 2.0

@contrachrist

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003927747755
TypeChannel
Username@contrachrist
DescriptionНовый CONTRA CHRIST. Разбираем христианских фанатиков и не только. Лучший анти-христианский канал.
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 21 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/contrachrist

Growth

959695.57 August 2026 — 95 subscribers7 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 2 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–96 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:0296no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:1096+1
7 Aug 2026, 06:5295first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
549.2%
avg views ÷ 96 subscribers
Avg views / post
527
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (21 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total9,490
Reactions total127
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
50
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

127 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54383608966970393666954.3%
🆒1915.0%
1612.6%
🔥1511.8%
custom 527390059456889647386.30%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 127reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 17:50 UTC131 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Забавно, но вскрылась инфа о том, как веруны пытались снести наши каналы (этот тоже) купив сносер, однако знатно про@бались и в итоге кинули деньги МНЕ, думая что покупают сносер. Лицемерие верунов наглядно - никакой доброты, только зло и ненависть, желание уничтожить оппонентов грязными методами.

custom 54383608966970393663🔥2🆒1

7 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC375 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✝️ Католицизм и религия падают в Латинской Америке. Католицизм, оставаясь крупнейшей религией Латинской Америки, продолжает массово терять позиции: доля католиков снизилась примерно с 70% в 2010 году до 54% сегодня, при этом сильнее всего спад заметен в Бразилии, Чили и особенно Уругвае (33%). Одновременно растёт число людей без религиозной принадлежности (включая атеистов и агностиков), а также влияние протестантс

custom 54383608966970393665🔥1custom 52739005945688964731

6 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC229 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

- Навигация канала CONTRA CHRIST - 🇮🇱✡️ 1. Иудейская идентичность Иисуса и Галилеи (разборы против адептов "эллинизма" Иисуса) - Назарет как традиционное иудейское поселение. Быт первых веков опровергает мифы об эллинизации Иисуса - Сепфорис как еврейский город - Меловые сосуды как маркер еврейской идентичности в Назарете и древней Галилее - Материальная культура Галилеи как свидетельство её иудейской идентичнос

custom 54383608966970393664custom 52739005945688964732🆒1

5 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC367 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😳✝️ Наоборот, христианству, как религии ориентированной на экспорт и универсальность не имеет значения с кем ты заключишь брак. Если это негр, то в этом никаких проблем нет. Ветхий Завет тоже содержит примеры включения иноплеменников (Раав, Руфь, эфиопская жена Моисея, египетская жена Иосифа Асенефа и др.). Расовый национализм неонацистов прямо противоречит этой логике. Почему-то глупые школьники-неонацисты этого не

custom 543836089669703936642🆒2

4 Aug 2026, 20:00 UTC568 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤷‍♀️✝️ Противоречие в природе Бога: коллективная вина против индувидуальной Бог Ветхого Завета часто предстает как карающий судья, наказывающий детей за грехи отцов, но в том же Ветхом Завете пророки утверждают обратное. Стих про наказание за грехи отцов. Исход 20:5: «...Я Господь, Бог твой, Бог ревнитель, наказывающий детей за вину отцов до третьего и четвертого рода, ненавидящих Меня». Текст нельзя "отменить" со

custom 54383608966970393663🔥2🆒1

2 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC612 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

➡️Современные философы наглядно... Мы решили провести небольшой ПСИОП и вкинуть этим недоумкам гипотезы о ЛЕТАЮЩИХ СВИНАХ прикрыв всё это разной демагогией, и вот итог... Филосухи действительно ПОВЕРИЛИ в летающих свиней, лишь бы попытаться "опровергнуть" сциентизм с наукой, с его неопровержимо истинными и работающими точными методами. Филосухи итоги 🤦🏻‍♀️

🔥5custom 54383608966970393662custom 52739005945688964731

1 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC590 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

☹️ Бог Шрёдингера. Логическое противоречие — бог меняется и не меняется • Исх 32:14 (Синодальный): «И отменил Господь зло, о котором сказал, что наведет его на народ Свой.» — Бог передумал и раскаялся в угрозе уничтожить Израиль. • Чис 23:19 (Синодальный): «Бог не человек, чтоб Ему лгать, и не сын человеческий, чтоб Ему изменяться. Он ли скажет и не сделает? будет говорить и не исполнит?» — Бог не меняет решения.

custom 543836089669703936631🆒1

31 Jul 2026, 12:00 UTC657 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🧐 Кто такой ЙОХАН ОСТХУЙЗЕН? Есть один "учёный", который, правда, не учёный, а обычный 18-летний колхозник-студент из ЮАР, на которого любят ссылаться разные арио-христиане и прочие христианские нацисты. Известен он как Йохан Остхуйзен (буквально его фамилия) и тем, что пишет псевдонаучные статьи. Статьи в стиле "древние евреи были арийцами и индо-европейцами", что очевидный бред. Выкладывает их на сайт academia.edu

custom 54383608966970393664🆒21

30 Jul 2026, 12:30 UTC631 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

💤 Сны и видения в Библии - одно и тоже. Сны прямо называются видениями или ставятся в один ряд с ними: 1. Книга Чисел 12:6 И сказал Он: «Слушайте слова Мои: если есть у вас пророк, то Я, Господь, открываюсь ему в видении, во сне говорю с ним». 2. Книга Иова 33:14-15 «...Бог говорит однажды и, если того не замечают, вторично: во сне, в ночном видении». 3. Книга Даниила 2:28 «...твой сон и видения головы твоей на лож

4🆒2custom 54383608966970393661

29 Jul 2026, 17:40 UTC568 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

✝️🤷‍♀️ Ответ на "разбор" нашей прошлой статьи Ждём археологических исследований от админов псбб. Пока никто не предоставит их, то можно утверждать что было что угодно, говоря что это правда, а любое отсутствие источников объяснять тем, что это просто "незначительное событие". Мотивы Матвея очевидны - он стремился подчеркнуть связь Иисуса с ветхозаветными текстами, а не описать то, что действительно происходило. Зая

🔥2custom 54383608966970393662custom 52739005945688964731

28 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC686 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🛫Предлагаю верующим челлендж: вы публикуете до 3 любых тезисов против атеизма в пользу бога. Любой из них мы публично разберём и дадим оценку 🤙🏻 Если мы считаем эти тезисы оригинальными, новыми и интересными, вы получите до 150 звёзд ⭐. Условие только одно - это должно быть опубликовано на вашем канале с хэштегом #RELIGION2026DEBATE сроком до 12 августа.

custom 543836089669703936642custom 52739005945688964731

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @contrachrist. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 366,430 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CONTRA CHRIST 2.0” (@contrachrist), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/contrachrist.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.