Channel
@content_spec
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
610subscribers
-19 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001862462129 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @content_spec |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/content_spec |
Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 610 | -5 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 615 | -5 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:59 | 620 | -4 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:48 | 624 | -5 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 21:47 | 629 | no change |
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:31 | 629 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 6 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
67 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 32 | 47.8% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 35.8% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 7.46% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 4.48% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 2.99% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.49% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 2 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Сегодняшняя норма — завтрашний минимум Всю прошлую неделю я провела на Неделе российского ритейла. Это были пять дней в режиме нон-стоп: оперативно освещать работу компании, писать посты, снимать интервью, монтировать и публиковать их день в день. В какой-то момент поймала себя на мысли, что вернулась к журналистским корням, порадовалась, что перешла из журналистики в маркетинг. И в очередной раз убедилась, как быс…
❤4🔥3👏1
А люди еще смотрят вебинары? После 18 июня у меня появился ответ — да, смотрят, в B2B уж точно. Собрали на вебинаре представителей FMCG, IT, CE, DIY и других отраслей. Я выступала организатором и курировала весь процесс: от первоначальной идеи и позиционирования до координации во время эфира и последующих рассылок по базе зарегистрировавшихся. В продвижении использовала преимущественно бесплатные способы: — анонсы…
❤4🔥3
Делюсь, промокод retail week 💅
❤1
Video message, posted without a caption
Второй день на Неделе Российского ритейла. Пришла послушать сессию про косметику и как её продавать в новой модели ритейла. Среди спикеров «М.Косметик», «Улыбка радуги», Lamoda, Scanderm, а вот @goldapple_ru, нет, как так?
🔥2
10 метрик, которые должен знать каждый маркетолог CR, CTR, CAC, ROI, CPC, CPA. Звучит как алфавитный суп, а на деле это база, без которой не объяснишь, почему маркетинг контент, перформанс или инфлюенс не взлетел или взлетел. Собрала все в одном документе: что значит метрика и как считается. Скачивайте и сохраняйте, чтобы не гуглить каждый раз.
❤3🔥1
Sticker, posted without a caption
😁1
Тренд репорт: 10 трендов AI-контента. Делюсь с вами.
Не в ресурсе: почему контент-стратегия ломается еще до запуска Важная часть стратегии — ресурсы. У каждой компании свой набор: где-то есть вовлеченный собственник, у кого-то — много денег, у иных — стильный офис или команда разбросана по миру. При этом отсутствие или недостаток тех или иных ресурсов — не тупик. С этим можно работать, если строить стратегию с учетом текущих вводных. Проблемы начинаются, когда компан…
🔥3❤1
Когда медиа рич, а ты нет Для коллег из Unisender и их блога «Конверт» дала комментарии к статье про рич-медиа и речь не про Forbes или РБК, где стоимость рекламы в нескольких сотен тысяч рублей. Это интерактивная цифровая реклама с мультимедийными элементами, которые стимулируют пользователя активно взаимодействовать с контентом. Может быть в формате 3D-баннера, квиза, карусели, игры и других. В статье автор собра…
❤3😁1
А вы знали про «Тренды» в LiveDune или тоже впервые слышите?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Я обычно не пишу комментарии Но тут не смогла пройти мимо. Вчера за ужином пока листала ленту наткнулась на рилс от смм лида одного из ведущих банков. Он был про то, как добиваться результатов в корпорации и среди тезисов было использование качественного софта. Я то подумала, сейчас будет какое-то банковское ноу-фау, но нет. Это оказался старый знакомый LiveDune и его инструмент «Тренды», где алгоритм собирает самы…
❤4😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @content_spec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
А вы знали про «Тренды» в LiveDune или тоже впервые слышите?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 6 June 2026 to 2 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Нескучный маркетинг” (@content_spec), 610 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/content_spec.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.