https://t.me/IslamAgainstModernism/3521
Signed M S

Channel
@contemp_muslim_issues
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001822056354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @contemp_muslim_issues |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/contemp_muslim_issues |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 133 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 131 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 131 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,382 |
| Reactions total | 33 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
33 reactions across 11 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 17 | 51.5% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 33.3% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 9.09% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 6.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://t.me/IslamAgainstModernism/3521
Signed M S
An individual who addresses proof-based arguments with popular cliches is one who has pride & promotes quietism or privatised salvation (a strand of catholic mysticism/evangelism). He wishes to shut down the haq that challenges his desires, challenges his temporary worldly comforts &/or challenges the “religion” of his forefathers, (which in a no. of cases was secular “Islam”).
Signed M S
https://t.me/maktabahulama/2939
Signed M S
Al-Bukhari related, on the authority of Abu Hurayrah Radiallahu Anhu that Nabi ﷺ said: “Allah marvels at a people who enter Jannah in chains.” Al-Hafiz Ibn Hajar said in Fatḥ al-Bari: “The murad of ‘by the chains being on their necks’ is restricted to the haal of this dunya. So there’s nothing that precludes construing the wording literally. The implicit meaning is: they (captives) enter Jannah having been, before t…
Signed M S
In the authoritative Kitaab, Kabeeri the following Shar'i pronouncement is recorded: "The husband is entitled to beat his wife for her neglect of Salaat or ghusl. And, if she does not abstain from her act of neglecting Salaat by means of beating, he can divorce her even though he is unable to pay her mahr (i.e. in the event of him not having yet paid her mahr). It's better that he meets Allah Ta'ala (in the Aakhirah…
❤1
Signed M S
al-Haskafi said (al-Durr al-Mukhtar, in the margin of Hashiyat Ibn Abidin, 3/188–189): "The master disciplines (yu’azziru) his slave, & the husband his wife, for her abandonment of the legally-prescribed/mandated adornment (al-zeenah al-shar’iyyah) despite her ability to perform it, & for her abandonment of ghusl from janabah, or for going out of the house without right, or if she uncovers her face before a non-mahr…
🔥2
Signed M S
https://themajlis.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/The-Sharee-ruling-on-Mufti-Taqi-Sbs-interview-with-a-Russian-woman.pdf The Shar’ee ruling on Mufti Taqi Sb’s interview with a Russian woman
Signed M S
In a world that hastens towards the material measure of production, an age-old question is being posed anew today: “how was the woman of yesterday, with her simple fitrah, able to build a cohesive society, whilst many households today stumble despite the claims (“da’wah”) of progress/development?” Verily, the mas’alah doesn’t lie in a lack of resourcefulness/means, but in a shift in the center of gravity & a scatter…
❤3
Signed M S
Apostasy in the Hanafi Madhab https://justpaste.it/do9al
❤1
Signed M S
The Matn of al-Durr al-Mukhtar & the commentary of Ibn Abidin “Whoever apostatises, the haakim presents to him Islam as a recommendation (istihbaban) according to the madhab, because the call has (already) reached him (بلوغ الدعوة) & his doubt is clarified/uncovered. And he’s obligatorily (wujuban) imprisoned, & it’s (also) recommended for 3 days. Islam is presented to him on each of those days, if he asks for a re…
❤2
Signed M S
Where harm/sins become all-pervasive in society & those in authority let it gain a foothold, then vice is normalised, to the point that it becomes the “haq” for the teacher & the student. The very few who challenge are silenced by predominantly online outrage, ridicule, belittlement & abuse. (Most of the public, for various reasons, are infirm when it comes to physical violence. This has been outsourced to & monopo…
❤5
Signed M S
Nowadays, our cowardice is such, that from layman to “learned,” Muslims have become incapacitated/neutered from even saying that the conflict is between Muslims & the Yahood as per the Qur’aan. Instead the conflict between Muslims & Yahood is labelled as one between zionists & Muslims, or Israel v Palestine. So yes Menk’s the bottom of the table in this regard, for not even being able to mention Israel, but we’re o…
👍2
Signed M S
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @contemp_muslim_issues. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,129,027 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Modern Day Muslim Issues” (@contemp_muslim_issues), 133 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/contemp_muslim_issues.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.