Channel
@conspiracyeyewitness
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001382974534 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @conspiracyeyewitness |
| Description | Only trustworthy content. |
| Created | 6 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/conspiracyeyewitness |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 21 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:48 | 21 | first reading |
6 posts held, back to 14 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 19 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Так как объёмные тексты не проходят в Telegram из-за большого количества символов, теперь буду публиковать информацию только на Bastyon, кому интересно, заходите и изучайте, там можно и без регистрации. https://bastyon.com/victorbrel?ref=PLLP9yYyyWw81fKo89pE4knFwFRWmeAedY
Signed Виктор Брель
На мою удачу на днях было чистое от "инверсионных" облаков небо (чудеса случаются!) и появилась возможность немного понаблюдать за Солнцем. Исходя из перспективы, тела отдаляющиеся от наблюдателя будут визуально уменьшатся в размерах (приближающиеся - увеличиваться). Те, кто уже интересовался темой нашего настоящего мироустройства в курсе, что Солнце делает оборот вокруг Северного полюса по разному радиусу, в зависи…
👍2
Signed Виктор Брель
Многие помнят о том, как на ютуПе убрали отображение количества дизлайков, вскоре после того как они начали в разы превышать лайки на "официальных каналах" (особенно под роликами Бидона)!? Что-то похожее теперь начинается и на фейкбуке, правда с более незаметной тактикой, нам просто закрыли информацию о том, кто оценил "публикацию" положительно, а кто ухахатывался над очередной промывкой мозгов (# 1 - # 8, # 9 - # 10…
Signed Виктор Брель
🛬 Теперь мы можем в реальном времени отслеживать истинную траекторию полёта 🛬 https://flatradar24.com/ 🛬 #FlatRadar24
Signed Виктор Брель
За всеми попытками верхушки отвлечь людей от действительно важных моментов, происходящих в последнее время, мной и многими другими было пропущено одно из таких событий - юбилейные 5 лет с момента, когда была объявлена "пандемия" смертельнейшего, но немного несуществующего Sars-Cov-2, в результате которой все кто не верил "научной науке" должны были погибнуть 🤷🏻♂. Но не переживайте, для верующих (выживших) в "вирусы" …
Signed Виктор Брель
Шар🌍пр🌎мывка мозгов теперь и в нашем городе! Хорошая новость заключается в том, что если этому уделяется столько внимания и средств со стороны травительства, значит люди действительно начинают интересоваться истиной! Снимки взяты со страницы мэра города, на фейкбуке.
Signed Виктор Брель
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @conspiracyeyewitness. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Conspiracy Eyewitness” (@conspiracyeyewitness), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/conspiracyeyewitness.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.