Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

شرکت مشاوره بانا

@competitionstudies

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

698subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001693676274
TypeChannel
Username@competitionstudies
Descriptionمشاوره حقوقی و اقتصادی (دعاوی رقابت و ضدانحصار، قراردادهای تجاری، تنظیم گری و رگولاتوری، تحلیل و ارزیابی سیاست گذاری، تحقیقات بازار و استراتژی قیمت گذاری) banaelc.com
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/competitionstudies

Growth

6986 Aug 2026, 04:52 — 698 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 16:37 — 698 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 04:526 Aug 2026, 16:37
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 697–699 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Aug 2026, 16:37698no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:52698first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
78.2%
avg views ÷ 698 subscribers
Avg views / post
546
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.549%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (15 December 20256 August 2026)
Views total1,638
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
578
Videos
70
Links
222

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

96 reactions across 17 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4850.0%
🔥2020.8%
👏1515.6%
👍1212.5%
👌11.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 December 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:07 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

📣 به تیم سیاست‌گذاری و تنظیم‌گری بانا بپیوندید شرکت مشاوره حقوقی–اقتصادی بانا، یک شرکت دانش‌بنیان و میان‌رشته‌ای، از یک کارشناس ارشد سیاست‌گذاری و تنظیم‌گری دعوت به همکاری می‌کند. در این جایگاه، مسئولیت طراحی سیاست‌ها و مقررات، مدیریت پروژه‌های پژوهشی–سیاستی، انجام مطالعات تخصصی و تطبیقی، نگارش گزارش‌های تحلیلی و ارائه راهکارهای تنظیم‌گری را بر عهده خواهید داشت. 🔹 شرح وظایف ▪️ مدیریت پروژه، از تعریف فازها و زمان‌

2

1 Aug 2026, 05:51 UTC991 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📣 به تیم اقتصادی ما بپیوندید!📊 ✅ شرکت مشاوره بانا در نظر دارد تیم اقتصادی خود را با یک کارشناس و تحلیل‌گر اقتصادی تمام‌وقت تکمیل نماید. 📌 شما در این موقعیت با تیم‌های حقوقی، سیاست‌گذاری و تنظیم‌گری همکاری خواهید کرد و مسئولیت‌هایی برعهده خواهید داشت چون: 🔸 پژوهش و تحلیل اقتصادی در حوزه اقتصاد بخش عمومی و اقتصاد سلامت 🔸 نگارش گزارش‌های تحلیلی و کار با داده‌های اقتصادی 🔸 همکاری در پروژه‌های تنظیم‌گری، به‌ویژه در حوزه

2

27 Jul 2026, 10:58 UTC576 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📣به تیم حقوقی ما بپیوندید. شرکت مشاوره بانا، یک شرکت دانش‌بنیان و میان‌رشته‌ای در حوزه مشاوره حقوقی–اقتصادی، سیاست‌گذاری و تنظیم‌گری، برای تکمیل تیم خود از یک کارشناس و تحلیل‌گر حقوقی تمام‌وقت دعوت به همکاری می‌کند. در این موقعیت، در حوزه‌هایی مانند: 🔹 پژوهش و تحلیل حقوقی 🔹 انجام پژوهش‌های حوزه حقوق عمومی، تنظیم‌گری و سیاست‌گذاری از طریق همکاری میان‌رشته‌ای با تیم اقتصادی و تنظیم‌گری 🔹 حقوق رقابت 🔹همکاری در نگارش

👏32

28 Jun 2026, 08:27 UTC751 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

آکادمی بانا برگزار می‌کند: در دوره آموزشی قیمت‌گذاری چه‌می‌گذرد؟ 🔹قیمت زبان صحبت با مشتری🔹 👤دکتر سید فرشاد فاطمی عضو هیات‌‌علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف به این سوالات پاسخ می‌دهند: 🔻چرا قیمت‌گذاری مهم است؟ 🔻تمایز این دوره با دوره‌های مشابه در چیست؟ 🔻محتوای دوره چه‌مواردی را پوشش می‌دهد؟ مهلت ثبت‌نام ۱۱ تیرماه 🔗 ثبت‌نام ▪️حضوری سه‌شنبه‌ها از ۲۳ تیر تا ۲۰ مرداد برج فناوری شریف ♦️جهت دریافت کد تخفیف هم اکنون رزومه خود

2

23 Jun 2026, 11:28 UTC927 views0 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

دفترچه دوره «قیمت‌گذاری محصول» این فایل شامل اطلاعات کامل دوره است. 🔹اهداف و مخاطبان دوره 🔹 معرفی ارائه‌کنندگان 🔹 زمان‌بندی و تایم‌لاین دوره 🔻 برای ثبت‌نام اینجا کلیک کنید. 🌐ما را در بانا دنبال کنید. #آموزش #اقتصادی

20 Jun 2026, 15:37 UTC≈3,360 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

آکادمی‌ بانا با حمایت انجمن تجارت الکترونیک تهران برگزار می‌کند: دوره قیمت‌گذاری محصول مدرس: 🗣️سیدفرشاد فاطمی هیات علمی دانشگاه صنعتی شریف 🔸تدریس مدل قیمت‌گذاری 3C (Cost,Competitor,Costumer) + مدل‌های رفتاری و حراج 🔰میهمانان صنعت دوره قیمت‌گذاری🔰 👤نیما نامداری مدیرعامل کارنامه 🔸اصول قیمت‌گذاری در پلتفرم‌ها در ایران؛ انتقال تجربه قیمت‌گذاری در کارنامه 👤امین سمیعی مدیرعامل اسنپ شاپ 🔸بررسی عنصر رقبا در قیمت‌گذاری پ

🔥3👏21

16 Jun 2026, 15:38 UTC436 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🔵نشست جدال نوآوری و انحصار در اقتصاد پلتفرمی 👤محمد مهدی جعفریان مدیرعامل بانا 🔹در اقتصاد دیجیتال، بزرگ بودن پلتفرم‌ها مشکل نیست. بزرگ بودن خود فرصت است، چراکه نوآوری نیازمند سرمایه و مقیاس است. مشکل وقتی شروع می‌شود که پلتفرم بزرگ از موقعیت مسلط خود سو استفاده کند تا رقبا نتوانند وارد بازار شوند یا رشد کنند. 🔹پس سیاست‌گذار در ایران باید نه ضد رشد پلتفرم‌های بزرگ باشد، نه اجازه دهد آن‌ها بازار را قفل کنند. 🔻 کار درس

👍1

16 Jun 2026, 08:08 UTC394 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

بیست و سومین رویداد فیناپ روایت ادامه دادن روایت مسیرهایی که با وجود تغییر شرایط همچنان ادامه پیدا می‌کنند. دکتر محمدمهدی جعفریان مدیرعامل و هم بنیان‌گذار بانا در این رویداد به موضوع رقابت در بازار طلای دیجیتال خواهند پرداخت 📅 پنج‌شنبه ۲۸ خرداد ۱۴۰۵ 🕐 ۱۲:۳۰ تا ۱۹:۳۰ 📍 مرکز همایش‌های کشتیرانی لینک ثبت‌نام: https://evand.com/events/finupcontinues #رویداد 🌐 ما را در بانا دنبال کنید.

👏2

25 Feb 2026, 16:54 UTC572 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📣 به تیم حقوقی ما بپیوندید! 🤝 ✅ شرکت بانا، به عنوان یک شرکت مشاوره‌ای میان‌رشته‌ای و دانش‌بنیان با تمرکز بر مشاوره حقوقی–اقتصادی، سیاست‌پژوهی و تنظیم‌گری، با سابقه همکاری‌های موفق متعدد با سازمان‌های دولتی و شرکت‌های بخش خصوصی هم چون تپسی و ازکی‌وام ، در نظر دارد تیم حقوقی خود را با یک کارشناس حقوقی تمام‌وقت تکمیل نماید. 📌 شما در این موقعیت با تیم‌های اقتصاد، سیاست‌گذاری و تنظیم‌گری همکاری خواهید کرد و مسئولیت‌هایی

👍3🔥1

17 Feb 2026, 06:38 UTC478 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

📊 یادداشت تحلیل حکم اخیر پرونده ضدانحصار گوگل؛ شکست پیروزمندانه آیا اصلاحات رفتاری جایگزین اصلاحات ساختاری میشود؟ ✍️ امیرحسین حاجی قاسمعلی سرپرست حقوقی شرکت مشاوره حقوقی-اقتصادی بانا در این یادداشت میخوانید: ◀️ یافته‌های مسئولیتی و تشخیص مکانیسم انحصار ◀️ رد درخواست تغییر ساختاری و واگذاری بخش‌هایی از گوگل ◀️ احیای رقابت‌پذیری از طریق اصلاح نظام رفتاری و قراردادی ◀️ نظام اشتراک‌گذاری داده به‌منزله مکمل اصلاحات

👍3🔥3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @competitionstudies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 134,064 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“شرکت مشاوره بانا” (@competitionstudies), 698 subscribers as measured 6 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/competitionstudies.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.