3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 522–523 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 10:23
522
-1
8 Aug 2026, 04:02
523
no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:21
523
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
203 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
67
33.0%
👍
32
15.8%
❤
31
15.3%
🔥
31
15.3%
💯
25
12.3%
😭
10
4.93%
👏
3
1.48%
🤔
2
0.985%
🥴
2
0.985%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 203reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 2 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 20 we hold a reading for · 30%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @compben_tips_and_tricks. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 November 2025 to 2 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📌 Перестаньте трясти клетку!
Испокон веков человек черпал в природе вдохновение, инженерные идеи и эстетику. И если вспомнить, что Homo sapiens — это всего лишь один из биологических видов, то становится очевидно: наблюдая за собаками или птицами, мы изучаем не просто зоологию, а элементы управления — лидерство, коммуникацию, мотивацию и т. д. То есть менеджмент можно изучать и на животных. Что я и делаю, благо у ме…
Наступил первый рабочий день весны и блог решил оттаять и вылезти из-под сугробов.
Поговорим о скоростях.
Мы, сиэнбишники, обычно живем годичным циклом. Раз в год участвуем в обзорах, раз в год пересматриваем зп, раз в год платим бонусы. Раз в год празднуем др и Новый Год.
Как-то об этом прознали сотрудники и ужаснулись - боже мой, рынок меняется так быстро, а вы сверяетесь с ним всего лишь раз в год!
Я как сиэнб…
Понедельничное.
Про старую добрую корреляцию или почему в аналитике не стоит на ней зацикливаться.
Для начала разберемся в терминах.
Корреляция - это связь между двумя явлениями, при которой изменение одного и изменение второго явления совпадает.
Например, выросли заработные платы и выросла инфляция - два явления, оба выросли, значит, есть корреляция.
Или: выросли заработные платы, а стоимость транспорта упала - …
ИИ для C&B
и при чем тут робот-пылесос
Готовлюсь проводить урок для C&B на тему HRTech. Но какой же HRTech в 2026 без ИИ))
А т.к я сама была C&B уже больше 10 лет назад, то поговорила об этом с Антониной, моей прекрасной подписчицей, с которой мы давно на одной волне)
Виктория, [В] Какие технологические изменения, на твой взгляд, привносит ИИ в работу C&B экспертов?
Антонина, [А] Как бы банально ни звучало, но ИИ д…
Пересмотр зп и годовой бонус - что может быть любимее. 😍
Правда, это уже завершающий акт драмы "постановка целей - подведение результатов - получение вознаграждения". 💯
Пока еще на рынке принято эту драму растягивать где-то на год, с перехлестом - не успели еще бонус получить, а пора уже задумываться о новых целях. 🤍
Но есть уже звоночки, что процесс ускоряется и зп пересматривают и чаще, чем раз в год. Не везде, …
С Наступающим Новым Годом! ✨
В декабре канал немного затих и дал себе время на передышку, но в новом 2026 году мы с вами снова встретимся, будем говорить о цифрах, как они причудливо складываются в статистические данные, а также как это все использовать, чтобы мотивировать людей делать то, что хочет работодатель 👌
А пока желаю вам спокойных и радостных праздников! Увидимся в 2026! 🍷
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @compben_tips_and_tricks. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Всем доброго понедельника! У меня к вам вопрос - а что для вас HR-аналитика?
Отчетность21%
Красивые графики (про найм, текучесть, абсентеизм и прочая)25%
Набор метрик32%
Дэшборды!34%
Опросы2%
Гипотезы про персонал и их тестирование47%
Прогнозирование поведения сотрудников49%
Поиск корреляций в данных45%
Иное, напишу комментарий2%
The shares total 257%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 136%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 2 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“C&B Tips” (@compben_tips_and_tricks), 522 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/compben_tips_and_tricks.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
