Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 뭐라도 하겠지 회산데

Channel

뭐라도 하겠지 회산데

@companytheydosomething

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

433subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002741857519
TypeChannel
Username@companytheydosomething
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/companytheydosomething

Growth

4154334247 August 2026 — 415 subscribers8 August 2026 — 415 subscribers15 August 2026 — 433 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 412–436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:03433+18
8 Aug 2026, 05:33415no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:07415first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.4%
avg views ÷ 433 subscribers
Avg views / post
106
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.89%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,011
Reactions total9
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 05:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 5 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
444.4%
😢222.2%
👍111.1%
👏111.1%
😱111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 02:45 UTC48 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Irq5LupJIIw 하네스 플라이휠

1

7 Aug 2026, 17:20 UTC99 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

투자논리가 훼손되었는가 점검하는 시간 깅코 투자 시작한지 1년째 그 동안 생긴일 투자시작 당시 그냥 구조조정중인 합성생물학 적자 회사 1. Bayer와 다년 계약 연장 (농업쪽, 기술은 있다는게 증명) 2. PNNL Amp2 & M2pc 수주 (미정부기관 대규모 자동화실험실) 3. OpenAI와 자동화 루프 실험 성공 (프론티어 AI와 연결고리 확인) 4. 자동화 실험실 올인 / 바이오 시큐리티 매각 (아쉽지만 뭐) 5. 아마존 백엔드 (아주 좆밥은 아니구나) 6. 마소 백엔드 (이거 진짜 되는기술이긴하네?) 7. NSF 노드 4개 계약 (미국 대학 자동화실험실) + 미 정책 우호적으로 흘러가는중 (1년째 주장중인데 된다고 깅코가 돈을벌까?) 1년간 투자논리는 오히려 내가 생각했던것보다 선명해졌는데 주가는 떨어지고 있다. 숫자만 보면 포지

1

7 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC98 viewsread 8 August 2026

정책까지 도와주는데도 이거 못살리면 진짜 걍 나가뒤져라

7 Aug 2026, 16:24 UTC99 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

켈리가 몇달전부터 계속 X에서 떠들어대고 심지어 실발조지고 담날 토론회 나가서 떠들고 있는내용 간략정리 COINS Act는 미국 돈과 기술이 중국의 AI·반도체·양자 같은 전략산업으로 넘어가는 걸 통제하는 법이고, 이건 이미 법으로 만들어짐. 그런데 미국 정치권에서 “바이오도 AI·반도체만큼 중요한 전략산업인데 왜 빠져있냐?”는 얘기가 나오면서, COINS 규제 대상에 바이오를 추가하자는 게 BINSA임. BINSA가 통과되면 미국 제약사들이 중국 바이오 회사에 투자하거나, 중국에서 개발한 기술을 라이선스하거나, 합작회사를 만드는 게 지금보다 훨씬 까다로워질 수 있음. 결국 미국이 하고 싶은 건 미국 돈·IP·R&D가 중국 바이오 산업을 키우는 걸 막고 미국 안으로 다시 끌어오는 것에 가까움. 지금은 하원에서 6월에 공화+민주가 BINS

7 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC106 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

바이오전문 펀드에서 하향해서 떨궛다 카더라

7 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC111 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

매출은 반토막에 적자는 그대로고 가이던스도 제시하지 않는다. 근데 기관은 오히려 더 들어오고 있다. 저새끼들도 물린걸까? 아니면 시장이 아직 카테고리를 못넣어서 시장평가를 못하는걸까?

7 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC119 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

로블록스는 그냥 아무 근거없이 체감상 넷플릭스 요때 느낌이 드네 대충 5토막 난것도 비슷하고

7 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC112 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

대화방에서 그냥 대충 찍어둔곳을 진짜로 올줄몰랏음

7 Aug 2026, 13:51 UTC112 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

여태 폭락해도 별로 안열받았는데 오늘 다른 우주섹터나 에너지 등등 잡주들 다 오르는데 이새끼 장 시작하자마자 마십 찍으니까 개열받네 갑자기

😢2👍1😱1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @companytheydosomething. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,089,450 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“뭐라도 하겠지 회산데” (@companytheydosomething), 433 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/companytheydosomething.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.