Channel
@commentforbook
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
34subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003539904009 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @commentforbook |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/commentforbook |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:44 | 34 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 35 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 35 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (5 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 109 |
| Reactions total | 16 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
43 reactions across 14 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5420202427804583872 | 33 | 76.7% | |
| custom 5449549608625662522 | 10 | 23.3% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 43reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
"давший клятву" брендон сандерсон часть 1 🖤🖤 122/1381 я долго думала, стоит ли немного отдохнуть от сандерсона, но рука больше ни к чему не тянется. теперь, когда последняя часть этой арки в пути, не хочется откладывать историю в долгий ящик.
custom 54202024278045838722
#почитать
Posted without readable text
custom 54202024278045838723
"слова сияния" брендон сандерсон 🪨🤩 1237/1237 у меня нет слов от того, насколько эпичным вышел финал этой части. насколько это масштабно. красиво... в хорошем смысле пафосно. это то самое героическое фэнтези, где каждую фразу хочется запомнить, где каждый момент поворотный, а каждое решение героев — судьбоносное. с этим очень легко переборщить, но у сандерсона все вышло и-де-аль-но! 🤩 мне трудно представить, как …
custom 54202024278045838723
Sticker, posted without a caption
custom 54202024278045838722
"слова сияния" брендон сандерсон 🤎🤩 1011/1237 не перестаю восхищаться слогом автора и тем, насколько детально проработан мир. он уже не кажется странным или полным загадок. он кажется естественным. и наверное, это самое сложное в работе любого автора, "придумать мир, в котором зеленое солнце будет естественным". 📌 впечатления со спойлерами очень интересно было наблюдать за взаимодействием каладина и шаллан, и во …
custom 54202024278045838723
"слова сияния" брендон сандерсон 🤩 🤩 917/1237 все же драмиона — это не мое. я читала много фанфиков, но почему-то именно по этому пейрингу сложнее найти что-то, что будет по-настоящему цеплять. или хотя бы будет с приятным слогом. поэтому возвращаюсь к "словам сияния" после небольшого перерыва.
custom 54202024278045838723
🤩🤩 второй фанфик в моей скромной коллекции. только в этот раз я немного приложила руку к оформлению.
custom 54202024278045838724custom 54495496086256625221
"козодой" you_will_suffer 🤩🤩 498/1270 я не ожидала, что эта история вызовет у меня чувство отвращения. я ни в коем случае не осуждаю тех, кому нравится подобное развитие отношений между персонажами (как и сам фанфик), но для меня это... даже слов не подобрать. казалось бы, в "скованных" сюжет был гораздо мрачнее. события ужаснее. "козодой" — это все же даркроман, и отношения героев развиваются так, как это обычно …
custom 54495496086256625224
"козодой" you_will_suffer 🌟🤩 351/1270 сейчас фанфик все больше напоминает фильм "молчание ягнят". гермиона навещает малфоя в камере, он делится с ней полезной для ордена информацией в обмен на ее воспоминания. кажется, что есть довольно много клише, но интересно, чем в итоге все закончится, ведь, как я понимаю, финал истории далеко не самый радужный, а значит и не типичный. 🌟 решила посмотреть, как выглядит сам ко…
custom 54202024278045838723
"козодой" you_will_suffer признаться честно, я не являюсь фанатом драмионы (так уж вышло, что из фанфиков по ГП больше цепляет именно драрри), но "скованные" в свое время по-настоящему запали в душу. вот только начинать знакомство с прейрингом именно с этой истории было большой ошибкой, потому что все последующие фанфики казались хуже. все начатые фанфики по драмионе я просто забрасывала или забывала — все они каза…
custom 54202024278045838723custom 54495496086256625221
поддалась соблазну, решила поставить себе шагомер с хоббитом. было бы здорово параллельно читать "Властелина колец", но впереди еще много километров, возможно даже успею.
custom 54202024278045838723
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @commentforbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 67,977 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“комментарий к книге.” (@commentforbook), 34 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/commentforbook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.