Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

comixstories | комиксы и общение

@comixstories

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

55subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001791944836
TypeChannel
Username@comixstories
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/comixstories

Growth

5510 Aug 2026, 19:15 — 55 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 20:33 — 55 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 19:1510 Aug 2026, 20:33
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–56 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 20:3355no change
10 Aug 2026, 19:1555first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.2%
avg views ÷ 55 subscribers
Avg views / post
25.4
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.99%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 18 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 May 20268 August 2026)
Views total457
Reactions total29
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 19:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 58s
Average length
1m 40s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

31 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥1135.5%
👍929.0%
619.4%
💔39.68%
custom 519523327779066876113.23%
💯13.23%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 May 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC17 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Выйдет продолжение сериала «Гаргульи» 🟣 «Дисней» уже официально подтвердил информацию. Спустя 32 года легендарный мульт вернут на экраны 🙏🏻 Смотрели в детстве? #анимация #дисней

🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 06:11 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Такой разный Джефф 😃 Один из самых позитивных персонажей вселенной комиксов «Марвел» - сухопутная акула Джефф 🦈 Появился совсем недавно, в 2018-м. Но уже успел стать всеобщим любимцем ☺️. Даже имеет сольную серию комиксов, пусть и коротких. Я сегодня - октябрьский Джефф 🎮 А вы? P.S.: в комментах забирайте стикерпак с Джеффом от It’s a bird ⏬ #марвел

👍1

7 Aug 2026, 22:07 UTC18 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Креативный постер «Койота против Акме» 🧨 На волне хайпа по Пауку - все средства хороши 😌 #кино

👍1

5 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @QewbsNewsVideo

Трейлер фильма «Хитрый Койот» в русском дубляже. В кино с 10 сентября. 📰 Гиковский Вестник

3 Aug 2026, 20:27 UTC29 viewsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Выходные имени Тома Холланда Прошедший уикенд стал самым кассовым 💵 за всю историю американского проката. Empire📕 пишет, что бокс-офис составил $430 млн. Основную выручку принесли фильмы с Томом Холландом: «Одиссея» и «Человек-Паук». В них он сыграл Телемаха и Питера Паркера соответственно. Похоже, наш парень вырос и превратился в одну из главных звёзд добротного экшена 😎. Возможно, это повлияет на студийных боссо

1 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кинотеатры снова в плюсе На днях прочёл на Variety длиннопост о ренессансе кинопроката. Передаю суть тезисно. Главный посыл: кризис кинотеатральной индустрии (частично) преодолён. Журналисты издания побеседовали с крупными игроками, посчитали цифры и получили оптимистичную картину. ◦ Текущий год впервые достигнет показателей до-ковидных времён. Общая годовая выручка составит > $10 млрд. ◦ Стриминги не смогли за

👍2🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 22:45 UTC23 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#человекпаук Паучок стартанул с рекорда💰 Фильм «Человек-Паук: Новый День» сегодня вышел в кинотеатрах. Он уже установил абсолютный(!) рекорд первого дня проката, собрав $173 млн 😱 Паук сместил с первого места ленту «Мстители: Финал», у которой было $157 млн в 2019-м.

👍1🔥1

30 Jul 2026, 21:20 UTC27 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#марвел Инсайдеры пишут, что отменили продолжение «Чудо-Человека» ⛔️ Жаль, если так. По мне, это один из лучших сериалов по комиксам в текущем году. Проект ни на что не похож. Он спокойный, но человечный и драматичный. Советую к просмотру 📺

1

29 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC26 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#человекпаук 🕸️ Если в гугле набрать название нового фильма о Пауке и тапнуть паутину - он запрыгнет на ваш экран. Развлекайтесь 😜 Премьера - уже 31 июля ⌛️

1👍1🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC22 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

#dc «Супергёрл» вышла в цифре 🔵🔴 Релиз состоялся так рано, потому что фильм провалился в прокате. Сборы - около $124 млн. При бюджете ~$170 млн. Рейтинг на RottenTomatoes 🍅 составил: 58% - от критиков и 76% - от зрителей. Я обязательно посмотрю фильм и составлю мнение 💯. Для меня это был самый ожидаемый проект года от DC. Будете смотреть? 🤔

👍1💯1🔥1

26 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC38 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

#марвел Гослинг сыграет Призрачного Гонщика 🙌🏻 Сбылась одна из главных фанатских хотелок последних лет. Как будто и не новость вовсе. Зато официально. Это было прямое включение с #ComicCon 📣

🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @comixstories. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 946,128 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“comixstories | комиксы и общение” (@comixstories), 55 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comixstories.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.