Channel
@comandirovkaknam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
186subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002225427802 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @comandirovkaknam |
| Description | Просто о себе, о своей жизни, о своей работе, о своих увлечениях, о своих друзьях 🤗 И ссылка на мой рабочий канал 👇 https://t.me/apartments_odi Моя Дочка Виктория Ким 🫶https://t.me/qustavi |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/comandirovkaknam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:22 | 186 | no change |
| 7 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 186 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 13 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
75 reactions across 9 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 19 | 25.3% | |
| 👍 | 14 | 18.7% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 14.7% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 💘 | 5 | 6.67% | |
| 🍓 | 3 | 4.00% | |
| 😘 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 19 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ошибка, которую допускало девяносто девять процентов человечества, заключалась в том, что люди стыдились быть собой и лгали, выдавая себя за других. 🇯🇵 Тойосаки Аки Я всегда была и буду собой 🤗💪 А вы??? 🤔
❤4🔥4🥰4
Как мило 🥰 когда тебя встречают дома такие нежные создания ))🤗
❤5🥰1😘1
Кто знает что это? 😉
Один раз в год сады цветут… 🌺🌺🌺
❤4👍3❤🔥2🥰1
#весна #Краснодар В этом году в Краснодаре весна ну прям задержалась на месяц точно. Зато по погоде смотрю опять все регионы выровнялись +10° и в Москве, и в Питере, и в Краснодаре 🤗 Как я люблю 🥰 Когда все цветёт🌺🌺🌺
💘5❤🔥4🍓3
#Детство 🥰 #Хлеб 🤗 #Родители 🤲 А помните какая вкусная горбушка была в детстве ? 🥰 Зачастую хлеб доносился до дома без двух горбушек, и мама отправляла меня заново за хлебом. 🫢 Но и вторая буханка приходила без горбушки 😂
👍7❤🔥3🥰1
#Стройка #Дача Ладно. Продолжим угадайки )) А эти чудо «гильзы» подо что?
#Стройка #Дача Как думаете что строю из кирпича? 🤔
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
#Стройка #Дача Как думаете что строю из кирпича? 🤔
«Нельзя доверять человеку, который что-то от тебя хочет. 🤔 А ещё, нет человека которому ничего не надо» Согласны ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Дизайн интерьера в Автосервисе. Прикольно да? 😍
👍2👌1🔥1
Ну вот началась первая Моя стройка 💪💪💪 Не знаю с чего там начинается загородный дом 🏠, а вот Дача 🤗 точно начинается с Мангальной зоны 🫶 Конечный результат обязательно покажу
🔥6🤗1🥰1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @comandirovkaknam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
#Стройка #Дача Как думаете что строю из кирпича? 🤔
The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
«Нельзя доверять человеку, который что-то от тебя хочет. 🤔 А ещё, нет человека которому ничего не надо» Согласны ?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 March 2026 to 19 April 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Елена Ким 🫶” (@comandirovkaknam), 186 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/comandirovkaknam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.