Channel
@colorcap
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
370subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001741011763 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @colorcap |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/colorcap |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:10 | 370 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 366 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 366 | first reading |
17 posts held, back to 24 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
11 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 24 December 2025 to 24 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
在撩骚软件上看到的照片，本来抱着试试看的心态加了联系方式，没想到还真让我约上了，妹妹是兼职的，还是个小嫩妹，看着很清纯没想到在床上还是个骚货，刚见面妹妹还有点矜持，一起洗了澡妹妹也渐渐的放开了，我指挥妹妹跪下给我舔，顺手摸着妹妹的大白兔，发现妹妹的乳头已经变硬了，我顺着摸到了妹妹的小穴，已经湿乎乎的了，没想到看着这么清纯，实则特别敏感，搞得我再也忍不住了，直接将妹妹丢到了床上，慢慢的往里进入，她的小穴非常紧，夹得我欲仙欲死，刚插进去妹妹就忍不住扭动着屁股，更加激起了我的兽性，猛的开始狂插起来，妹妹嘴里也是淫叫不断，接着我又让妹妹撅起屁股开始后入，拍打着妹妹的屁股冲刺着，白皙的屁股被我拍得红红的，感觉妹妹也是特别的享受，我的战斗力一般都是十几分钟左右，都能给她操到痉挛，可见妹妹在床上也是特别骚的，特别有征服欲，兄弟们有需要的可以联系她。
Photo, posted without a caption
恭喜新老客户新的一年快快乐乐，发大财，
最后一天，老板们
上课了
Photo, posted without a caption
个人兼职 #可上门 中介勿扰 有教室 定期检查 无押金订金 见面满意付 无额外费用 💋身高:168 🌷年龄:20 🐷体重:48 🦋粉👉🏻敏感型🌸 莞式全套：600起 偶尔兼职，软妹子需求大，三点粉嫩水多，舞蹈系，可一字马，经常练舞蹈身材比例好，配合各种姿势做爱，听话 乖巧 配合 不催钟 服务内容:口爆 足交 毒龙 黑丝 制服 角色 诱惑 情趣 阴推 胸推 内射 三通 配合各种场景激情做爱 与你号：ppy2266 电报号：@gdww667
❤5
个人兼职 #可上门 中介勿扰 有教室 定期检查 无押金订金 见面满意付 无额外费用 💋身高:168 🌷年龄:20 🐷体重:48 🦋粉👉🏻敏感型🌸 莞式全套：600起 偶尔兼职，软妹子需求大，三点粉嫩水多，舞蹈系，可一字马，经常练舞蹈身材比例好，配合各种姿势做爱，听话 乖巧 配合 不催钟 服务内容:口爆 足交 毒龙 黑丝 制服 角色 诱惑 情趣 阴推 胸推 内射 三通 配合各种场景激情做爱 与你号：ppy2266 电报号：@gdww667
❤2
上课了
上班了，老板们
你
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @colorcap. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 200,984 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@colorcap named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小兰的花园” (@colorcap), 370 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/colorcap.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.