Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Gatti on stage

Channel

Gatti on stage

@colonelroyce

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry

43subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001298840095
TypeChannel
Username@colonelroyce
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/colonelroyce

Growth

4143426 August 2026 — 42 subscribers10 August 2026 — 42 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43 subscribers6 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41–43 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 20:1343+2
16 Aug 2026, 06:0541-1
10 Aug 2026, 17:4642no change
6 Aug 2026, 23:3542first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 30 January 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

17 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52675038506668683251270.6%
custom 5267476822437678629211.8%
custom 5310278924616353584211.8%
custom 536862916918379205015.88%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 January 2025 to 30 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @colonelroyce. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 January 2025 to 30 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Mar 2026, 08:15 UTC55 views1 reactions1 Starread 10 August 2026

Eleven years ago, The Day is My Enemy, second to last album of The Prodigy, was released. It holds a special meaning for me. I clearly remember waiting for my iTunes (remember that thing, huh?) pre-order to unlock. It was, like, 4 or 6 am. The sun was just starting to rise. I put on my headphones — … — and it’s pure magic. Pure energy. Pure life itself. Drop by drop, track by track. Then, I listen to it non-stop du

custom 52675038506668683251

2 Mar 2026, 01:23 UTC63 viewsread 10 August 2026

I love the smell of napalm in the morning iykwimaityd. Good night, sleep tight (with one eye open, we’re off to never-never land)🔥

1 Mar 2026, 01:49 UTC61 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Yay, one batshit crazy motherfucker less. Hopefully, that won’t be the last one this year. The question is, who’s next? 🤔 An even bigger question is what will happen in Iran after the butcher is dead. The death of a dictator doesn’t necessarily mean the end of the regime — sad but true. Let’s hope for the best, though. P.S. If it wasn’t obvious, I don’t support neither Trump nor Bibi. Either way, what’s done is don

custom 52675038506668683252

3 Jan 2026, 18:50 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026

Yeah, we’re only three days into 2026 and some big crazy shit is already happening. Wasn’t I right lol?

1 Jan 2026, 01:24 UTC84 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Happy NY! My 2026 is going to be violent violet hehe May there be less dictatorship and anti-freedom of any kind (there’ll probably be not), fewer insane and stupid people (totally ain’t gonna happen), more progress that benefits everyone (will happen but the scale is arguable), and more rock & roll kind of shit (practically guaranteed). Inland Empire: It is not said, but it’s known that the glass of wine can talk

custom 52675038506668683251

14 Oct 2025, 20:30 UTC114 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Two years. Unbelievable. I'm glad they are finally back. It's a tragedy that it took so long, and that many more didn't make it — either on the day of the attack or later. I still remember every bit of it clearly. All of it, raw uncensored field evidence. The feeling that in several hours some group may reach your home. Disorder. Human suffering. People not knowing the fate of their loved ones, relatives, and frien

custom 52675038506668683254

1 Oct 2025, 07:42 UTC121 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Now that we have whopping two apps to exclusively host meaningless AI slop — built by utterly deranged people for other insanely stupid and batshit crazy people — can we finally ban it everywhere else? I can’t imagine a single sane person (minors and elderly, who by definition have less control over what they watch/read/share/etc, excluded) who’ll ever use it. The idea of such an app is pure, concentrated antagonism

custom 52674768224376786291custom 52675038506668683251

14 Jul 2025, 13:00 UTC145 viewsread 10 August 2026

Welp, I had to use genAI to create the most uncanny, disgusting, and disturbing image snippet for this article: https://colonelroyce.com/genai-dont-care/

19 Mar 2025, 13:28 UTC171 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

All these words together make absolutely no sense. A random sequence of bullshit. People who make up such things belong in an asylum.

custom 53686291691837920501

13 Mar 2025, 14:04 UTC161 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

me IRL every time when… well, just every fucking time

custom 53102789246163535842

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @colonelroyce. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Gatti on stage” (@colonelroyce), 43 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/colonelroyce.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.