Channel
@colliero
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
133subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003667173742 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @colliero |
| Description | shameful channel |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| On Telegram | t.me/colliero |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 133 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:50 | 133 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:12 | 132 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (12 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,396 |
| Reactions total | 252 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
634 reactions across 16 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5332532859573903870 | 153 | 24.1% | |
| custom 5332500883542384696 | 144 | 22.7% | |
| custom 6325361850519134331 | 136 | 21.5% | |
| custom 5257964397589968741 | 122 | 19.2% | |
| custom 5269244472062930300 | 59 | 9.31% | |
| custom 5431737846673195403 | 10 | 1.58% | |
| custom 5456596447367548965 | 6 | 0.946% | |
| custom 5332563568590069361 | 3 | 0.473% | |
| 😡 | 1 | 0.158% |
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 634reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @colliero. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 12 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
marshaлл ллее а мне его женская версия больше симпатизирует.. #adventuretime спасибо за звёздочки!!
custom 533253285957390387022custom 632536185051913433112custom 52692444720629303006custom 54317378466731954033
вип реквест может быть зарендерю... рест ....
custom 525796439758996874120custom 533250088354238469610custom 63253618505191343317custom 52692444720629303001custom 53325328595739038701
ос меня артблочит в последнее время так что к сожалению скорее всего что либо постить буду реже (😢😭) кстати этот арт я рисовала почти месяц спасибо за звездочки, лютипоша, саша!! #oc
custom 632536185051913433120custom 533253285957390387010custom 54565964473675489656custom 53325008835423846962custom 54317378466731954032custom 52579643975899687411custom 52692444720629303001
реквест от первого человека в комментариях я с геншина жалую только сандбин поэтому эта головешка далась мне очень мучительно и сложно особенно одежда и эти .детали ☠️ (которые в итоге не нарисовала нормально) наверное первый и последний арт по этому фандому #геншин следующий маршалл я думаю
custom 632536185051913433119custom 533253285957390387010custom 53325008835423846967custom 52579643975899687413
еще один вип где мне пришлось рисовать нос #oc
custom 533250088354238469614custom 632536185051913433110custom 53325328595739038708
guys давайте нарисую некоторые ваши реквесты 🥺
custom 53325328595739038708custom 52692444720629303003custom 63253618505191343313
коллаб с @Lynxicguy 🤖 #adventuretime СПАСИБО за звезды
custom 533250088354238469623custom 52579643975899687419custom 53325328595739038708custom 63253618505191343312😡1
вип
custom 632536185051913433125custom 52579643975899687419custom 53325008835423846969custom 53325635685900693611
☺️ угадайте кто мой любимый персонаж #adventuretime
custom 526924447206293030023custom 533250088354238469615custom 632536185051913433112custom 53325328595739038702custom 53325635685900693612custom 52579643975899687411custom 54317378466731954031
хир ми аут торт ивент для флуда (☠️) #adventuretime спасибо за звёзды 😘
custom 533250088354238469628custom 526924447206293030016custom 533253285957390387012custom 52579643975899687412
для сравнения мой рисунок ровно год назад и сегодня
custom 533253285957390387017custom 52579643975899687414
я и саша контент не по фандомам который никто не любит 😞😣 #oc
custom 533250088354238469621custom 533253285957390387013custom 63253618505191343318
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @colliero. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 19,373 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Койлер” (@colliero), 133 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/colliero.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.