Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Collective Evolution

@collectiveevolution

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

17,041subscribers

-50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001170956238
TypeChannel
Username@collectiveevolution
Created25 March 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/collectiveevolution

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@collectiveevolution/3212 · this entry26 Jan 2026, 21:30 UTC@thepulseone/216927 Jan 2026, 13:19 UTC1.0016 hours
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@thepulseone13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.007.8 hoursthis entry (76)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 14 February 2025 to 12 May 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @collectiveevolution — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 6 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

17,04117,09117,0666 August 2026 — 17,091 subscribers6 August 2026 — 17,090 subscribers7 August 2026 — 17,085 subscribers9 August 2026 — 17,076 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,074 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,063 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,050 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,041 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 17,034–17,099 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 18:3317,041-9
11 Aug 2026, 20:5217,050-13
10 Aug 2026, 21:3317,063-11
10 Aug 2026, 00:0217,074-2
9 Aug 2026, 02:2117,076-9
7 Aug 2026, 23:4517,085-5
6 Aug 2026, 23:3817,090-1
6 Aug 2026, 09:5217,091first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 31s
Average length
2m 16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

12 May 2026, 14:41 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

Do you feel hopeless about the state of or direction of the world? Connecting back to possibility and not getting lured into nihilism is key. You can watch this full episode of Sarah Chave's podcast here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A-TmMaOBpU8

6 May 2026, 22:15 UTC≈2,250 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @SarahChavePhoto

Everything we believed about the world… is starting to unravel. Systems are breaking down. Trust is shifting. And more people are asking: what’s really going on...and what comes next? In this powerful conversation, Joe Martino (founder of Collective Evolution) explores how our beliefs are shaped, why so many are feeling disillusioned and how inner transformation connects to real change in the world. This isn’t jus

20 Feb 2026, 17:54 UTC≈3,800 viewsread 12 August 2026

President Trump signed an executive order to increase glyphosate production in the United States - the same toxic pesticide RFK Jr. promised to remove from the food supply. This video breaks down what's really happening and why our system makes it nearly impossible to fix these problems. https://youtu.be/9rLgYsfyR3c

18 Feb 2026, 17:49 UTC≈2,990 viewsread 12 August 2026

We dive deep into the recently released Epstein files that reveal connections between Jeffrey Epstein, the Rothschild banking family, and major geopolitical events, including the Ukraine conflict. We're looking to reveal the hidden complexity behind major world events and challenge mainstream narratives about war, foreign policy, and the forces that truly drive global conflicts. Understanding these connections is cr

14 Feb 2026, 17:26 UTC≈2,540 viewsread 12 August 2026

We discuss whether we are truly going to get the truth regarding the Epstein Files, and what this moment really allows humanity to see. Can we really expect the government to accurately investigate the government? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_Z1aAQag4w

12 Feb 2026, 19:18 UTC≈2,290 viewsread 12 August 2026

We examine a disturbing journal referenced in the latest Epstein files release, reportedly written by an alleged victim with autism who describes being trafficked and exploited over an extended period of time, including being made into a "human incubator" for Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. The journal also names several high profile individuals as potential abusers. We approach the document with care and scr

11 Feb 2026, 23:47 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 12 August 2026

We explore a few documents in the latest Epstein files release that warrant a closer look: an interview of an alleged Epstein victim documented by a NYPD detective working within the Child Exploitation and Human Trafficking Task Force. This interview fits a well-established pattern of the trafficking, rape, and torture of children at the highest levels of power - and the extraordinary lengths powerful elites will go

26 Jan 2026, 21:30 UTC≈2,810 viewsread 12 August 2026

It's common for people feel a cabal or Deep State controls the entirety of the world. Is this accurate? Or is the structure of the Deep State more complex? Then there is the question of whether Trump is attempting to take down the Deep State, but does this really make sense given current events? In this video, we have a brief discussion about the idea that the deep state isn't monolithic, but warring unelected facti

12 Jan 2026, 23:43 UTC≈3,560 viewsread 12 August 2026

Back with our first video in a long while, more to come! In this, we look beyond the headlines surrounding the tragic death of Renee Good at the hands of ICE agents. While coverage has focused on fitting the event into partisan narratives, a deeper story is being missed. We explore how the growing civil unrest and use of militarized policing on US streets reveal deeper failures in our institutions while doing little

27 Sept 2025, 20:02 UTC≈4,790 viewsread 12 August 2026

Thinking about our current zeitgeist and the need to embrace a new story of being. https://joemartino.substack.com/p/what-do-we-need-right-now

10 Apr 2025, 19:33 UTC≈7,630 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

This applies everywhere but, with another election coming here in Canada, we still seem to enter into a state of amnesia as a society where we point to one party or another who is the problem/solution, all while missing the bigger underlying issue both parties play into. I get it, it's hard to wrap our minds around changing an entire system. None of us are alone in having little idea of how to change it given the sc

9 Apr 2025, 21:01 UTC≈4,510 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @thepulseone

A recent commentary published in the journal Vaccine by Professor Christine Stabell Benn, of the Bandim Health Project at the University of Southern Denmark, challenges the conventional view of vaccines. While vaccines are recognized for their ability to prevent specific diseases, Benn highlights a critical but overlooked phenomenon: non-specific effects (NSEs). NSEs can either bolster or weaken overall health by s

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @collectiveevolution. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 30,312 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Collective Evolution” (@collectiveevolution), 17,041 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collectiveevolution.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.