Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

NFT DigitalArt

@collection

2 usernames

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

387subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001775477192
TypeChannel
Usernames@collection @digitalart
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/collection

Growth

3813873845 August 2026 — 381 subscribers6 August 2026 — 381 subscribers7 August 2026 — 382 subscribers12 August 2026 — 387 subscribers5 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 380–388 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 23:56387+5
7 Aug 2026, 19:01382+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:17381no change
5 Aug 2026, 21:20381first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 15 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍6259.6%
2120.2%
😱65.77%
🤣65.77%
😁32.88%
🍾21.92%
🔥21.92%
🤪21.92%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2023 to 18 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

18 Apr 2025, 06:43 UTC≈9,040 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Fun fact. “The Smiling Disaster Girl” Zoë Roth sold her original photo for $500,000 as a non-fungible token (NFT) at an auction in 2021. @DigitalArt

👍85

15 Apr 2025, 16:45 UTC≈7,800 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

↗️ Share it with a Trader. Join @Learn2Trade — for Daily Tips & Flashcards to Master Trading.

👍2

15 Apr 2025, 14:55 UTC≈5,270 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

OpenSea: Solana Trading Goes Live on OS2! Solana token trading is now available for beta users — and rolling out to more soon. A huge step in our multi-chain journey. Coins first, NFTs coming later. Most tokens already tradable! Source @DigitalArt #Solana #Web3 #OS2

👍21

14 Apr 2025, 05:13 UTC≈4,220 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

An Alien CryptoPunk just sold for 4,000 ETH ($6.1M) The seller bought it a year ago for 4,500 ETH. Only a 500 ETH loss? Not a big deal? Well… ETH was $3,500 back then. So the buy price = $15.75M The sale price = $6.1M Actual loss: ~$10M USD One of the most expensive L’s in NFT history. Pain. @DigitalArt

😱2

13 Apr 2025, 05:06 UTC≈3,100 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

NFT Flipper Busted for Hiding $13M from the IRS Waylon Wilcox, 45, from Pennsylvania, has pleaded guilty to hiding over $13 million in profits made from flipping 97 CryptoPunks NFTs. Despite raking in millions during the 2021–2022 bull run, Wilcox reported zero to the IRS—literally checking “no” on the crypto question on his tax forms. He now faces up to 6 years in prison and owes $3.2 million in back taxes. Remin

😱41

12 Apr 2025, 06:35 UTC≈2,060 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

NFTs will make a comeback in 2025 I recently attended a research summit for big tech and the entertainment industry. One of the research companies made the above statement. They are known to have a 90% hit rate on their predictions. The audience laughed. I smiled. Higher. Thoughts?! @DigitalArt

😁3👍1

11 Apr 2025, 10:58 UTC≈1,570 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Would You Pay $69M for a JPEG? Back in 2021, Beeple sold a single piece of digital art for $69,000,000. Yes—just a JPEG. But behind that JPEG was years of work, NFT tech, and a huge shift in how we see ownership online. Since then, the game has changed… Today, NFTs are more than just profile pics — they’re: • Digital art galleries • Exclusive membership passes • On-chain collectibles • Even full-blown revenue-gene

👍41

30 Oct 2024, 09:58 UTCviews —

NFT DigitalArt pinned «Are you interested in joining a dedicated Gem-Hunting channel for Meme coins?»

30 Oct 2024, 09:51 UTC≈7,150 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Poll

What are the primary causes of trading stress?

  1. Fear of losing money62%
  2. Market volatility20%
  3. Lack of a clear trading plan25%
  4. Pressure to meet financial goals17%
  5. Difficulty in managing emotions19%
  6. Uncertainty about trade outcomes15%
  7. Decision-making under time pressure17%
  8. Overexposure to news and market analysis13%
  9. Inadequate knowledge or experience22%
  10. Balancing trading with other life responsibilities20%

The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍122

30 Oct 2024, 09:04 UTC≈5,620 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Are you interested in joining a dedicated Gem-Hunting channel for Meme coins?

  1. Absolutely, send me the link! 🚀67%
  2. Maybe, tell more about it. 🤑23%
  3. Not interested, but thanks!10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

29 Oct 2024, 21:40 UTC≈5,250 viewsread 6 August 2026

Don’t forget this Sometimes the key to trading success is staying alive long enough to get lucky

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @collection. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

30 Oct 2024, 09:51 UTCAnonymous Poll1,300 voters approx.

What are the primary causes of trading stress?

  1. Fear of losing money62%
  2. Market volatility20%
  3. Lack of a clear trading plan25%
  4. Pressure to meet financial goals17%
  5. Difficulty in managing emotions19%
  6. Uncertainty about trade outcomes15%
  7. Decision-making under time pressure17%
  8. Overexposure to news and market analysis13%
  9. Inadequate knowledge or experience22%
  10. Balancing trading with other life responsibilities20%

The shares total 230%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

30 Oct 2024, 09:04 UTCAnonymous Poll1,040 voters approx.

Are you interested in joining a dedicated Gem-Hunting channel for Meme coins?

  1. Absolutely, send me the link! 🚀67%
  2. Maybe, tell more about it. 🤑23%
  3. Not interested, but thanks!10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

2 Jul 2023, 02:56 UTCAnonymous Poll219 voters

Hey everyone, I'm looking to shape our content around your interests. What would you prefer to see more of in this NFT-related channel? Please vote and help me serve you better!

  1. NFT Trading Signals54%
  2. Tips on Profit Maximization in NFT Market25%
  3. Tutorials on NFT Sniping26%
  4. Latest NFT News22%
  5. All45%

The shares total 172%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2023 to 18 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 536,238 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“NFT DigitalArt” (@collection), 387 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/collection.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.