Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CoinRabbit

@coinrabbit

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

241subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002176035307
TypeChannel
Username@coinrabbit
DescriptionCoinRabbit – crypto asset management platform where investors borrow, earn, trade, and grow their portfolios. Safe custody since 2020. Start now – https://go.coinrabbit.io/tg
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/coinrabbit

Growth

240241240.56 Aug 2026, 01:46 — 240 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 01:44 — 241 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:32 — 241 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 01:467 Aug 2026, 02:32
3 measurements spanning 1 day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 240–241 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:32241no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:44241+1
6 Aug 2026, 01:46240first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 16 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
13.3%
avg views ÷ 241 subscribers
Avg views / post
32.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held15 (16 October 20256 August 2026)
Views total96
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
67
Videos
1
Links
46

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

14 reactions across 6 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
964.3%
👏321.4%
🔥17.14%
🤩17.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC8 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cryptoquant_officialPhoto

Smart money is buying this bear market. Retail is selling into it. BTC whale balances climbed to ~3.06M coins through 2026, accumulating as price broke below $60K. ETH shows a clear split: large cohorts (10k+) at record highs, while smaller wallets keep distributing. BTC and XRP are trading near realized price, ETH is already below it, the zone that's historically marked cycle lows. Supported by @coinrabbit. 👉 F

5 Aug 2026, 15:05 UTC43 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

“Public blockchain transparency lets anyone audit your net worth in real time, turning private wealth into public information” – Walter Barrett, Chief Strategy & Growth Officer at CoinRabbit This idea is at the core of our latest report with @CNAnnouncements, recently featured by @DecryptNews. We explore why financial privacy is a fundamental layer of institutional-grade security. When absolute transparency turns

1

5 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC45 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Building a culture of wealth is a long-term discipline. Throughout Q2, we focused on making capital management more efficient and seamless. Here is a look at the key platform updates we delivered in Q2↑

22 Nov 2025, 17:22 UTC351 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

At CoinRabbit, every user gets the experience that fits their goals. Whether you’re here for simple, fast lending or looking for tailored, high-volume solutions – you decide what works best for your strategy. Choose the plan that matches your objectives, stay in full control, and grow your portfolio your way: https://coinrabbit.io/private-clients/

2

21 Nov 2025, 17:22 UTC300 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dips don’t wait. Neither should you. Unlock liquidity → buy the dip → repeat. Make Mr. Rothschild proud: https://go.coinrabbit.io/tg

18 Nov 2025, 12:31 UTC275 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚠️ Service Notice Due to Cloudflare issues, you may see temporary platform instability. CoinRabbit is fully operational, and our Support team is on hand 24/7 to assist with any questions or concerns you may have. If you need help, please contact us through the official support channels (https://t.me/CoinRabbit_Support_bot) Your funds are safe and secure.

2

5 Nov 2025, 09:30 UTC324 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This is Bitcoin’s price every November 5th. The winners? The ones who stayed in the game. Don't fear the dips – value comes to those who wait.

4 Nov 2025, 18:34 UTC248 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Crypto isn’t just about trading or holding. It’s also about financial flexibility. Crypto loans are a tool you can use smartly & safely to • avoid selling assets emotionally • stay in the market • continue growing your portfolio The key is choosing a service that operates transparently: cold storage, multisig, no rehypothecation, fast withdrawals. CoinRabbit delivers all of this.

3 Nov 2025, 17:04 UTC189 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A side-by-side look at lending options From approval speed to collateral flexibility – here’s how crypto loans and traditional bank loans compare for modern investors.

1 Nov 2025, 12:36 UTC188 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

The true delight — our ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ review! Have you tried to take out a Crypto loan at CoinRabbit? Leave a review to let us know your thoughts! Your feedback is valuable to us! https://trustpilot.com/review/coinrabbit.io

30 Oct 2025, 12:34 UTC190 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

From #HODLer to strategist. Meet Matthew, a businessman and active #trader managing 20+ crypto loans on CoinRabbit. By borrowing against his crypto, Matthew keeps his assets intact while unlocking liquidity for new opportunities. In our latest interview, he shares how to: → Grow your portfolio without selling → Manage risk like a pro → Turn non-liquid assets into real cash flow Read Matthew’s story — and see h

29 Oct 2025, 12:33 UTC182 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Why Our Users Say CoinRabbit Support Feels Like Magic We asked Veta, Head of Support, what principles guide our team: 1) A personal approach for every client. We tailor our style and words so every response is clear and easy to understand — no complicated instructions or scripts. 2) Instant first reaction. We reply in chat within two minutes, so you immediately know we’re on it. 3) Real human interaction. Almost

👏3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @coinrabbit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,412 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoinRabbit” (@coinrabbit), 241 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinrabbit.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.