Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CoinBrain Announcements

Channel

CoinBrain Announcements

@coinbraincomann

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

628subscribers

-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001792377919
TypeChannel
Username@coinbraincomann
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/coinbraincomann

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6286566427 August 2026 — 656 subscribers7 August 2026 — 656 subscribers14 August 2026 — 655 subscribers22 August 2026 — 651 subscribers30 August 2026 — 645 subscribers7 September 2026 — 644 subscribers30 September 2026 — 632 subscribers9 October 2026 — 628 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
8 measurements spanning 63 days, net -28. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 624–660 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 17:35628-4
30 Sept 2026, 06:55632-12
7 Sept 2026, 22:59644-1
30 Aug 2026, 13:43645-6
22 Aug 2026, 16:26651-4
14 Aug 2026, 10:24655-1
7 Aug 2026, 10:16656no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:45656first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 December 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

19 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍631.6%
🔥526.3%
👏421.1%
🤔210.5%
❤15.26%
👎15.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 19 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 December 2024 to 15 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 May 2025, 12:54 UTC465 viewsread 7 August 2026

🔮 Should you go multi-chain with your gambling? We present the no BS pros and cons list: https://coinbrain.com/blog/cross-chain-bridging-pros-and-cons-in-2025

7 May 2025, 11:01 UTC519 viewsread 7 August 2026

🤑 Why is nobody talking about Cosmos? They are offering some of the higherst APYs on the staking market rn! Here’s how to farm: https://coinbrain.com/blog/how-to-stake-cosmos-tokens-for-rewards-a-step-by-step-guide

2 May 2025, 08:59 UTC491 viewsread 7 August 2026

Hottest pump.fun competitor rn: https://coinbrain.com/blog/boop-fun-solanas-new-memecoin-launchpad-explained

30 Apr 2025, 08:57 UTC432 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚨BREAKING: https://coinbrain.com/blog/alpaca-finance-delisting-turned-to-4500-price-rally

2 Apr 2025, 12:26 UTC481 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⛓️ Continuing with our cross-chain tutorial series. Delta neutral stablecoin farming across different chains 🧑‍🌾 https://coinbrain.com/blog/cross-chain-stablecoin-yield-farming-strategies This strategy is: ✅ Stable in profit ✅ Long-term viable ✅ Resistant to impermanent loss

👍2

19 Mar 2025, 15:36 UTC461 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

⚡️Our Ultimate guide for Cross-chain gas fee optimization is out! If you do a lot of cross-chain swaps, this guide will save you hours and hours of research 📚️️ https://coinbrain.com/blog/bridging-gas-fee-optimization

👏2

18 Mar 2025, 03:34 UTC386 viewsread 7 August 2026

🚀 Big update! Sonic Chain integration is LIVE on CoinBrain! 🚀 Instantly filter, analyze, and safely trade your next crypto favorite. Check it out 👉 https://coinbrain.com/blog/sonic-chain-tokens-are-now-available-on-coin-brain-discover-your-next-gem-today

12 Mar 2025, 13:40 UTC361 viewsread 7 August 2026

Like me, many of you are surely asking the same question: "Is the crypto bull run over?" While I don’t have a crystal ball 🔮, this is probably the best educated guess rn. 📚 Read our findings in this article: https://coinbrain.com/blog/is-the-crypto-bull-run-over

5 Mar 2025, 11:53 UTC378 viewsread 7 August 2026

For all of you farming degens here’s a nice opportunity for upcoming airdrop 🪂 People are alreary accumulating Dropee point like crazy here’s how to do it efficiently: https://coinbrain.com/blog/dropee-daily-combo-and-question-of-the-day-updated-every-day

28 Feb 2025, 14:59 UTC354 viewsread 7 August 2026

Just spent a few days diving into Solayer coin and thought I'd share what I found! 📊 Been hearing a lot about this project lately and decided to put together my thoughts on where the price might be heading. Read here 👉 https://coinbrain.com/blog/solayer-layer-coin-price-prediction-2025-expert-analysis-of-layer-crypto-price-trends

21 Feb 2025, 13:23 UTC362 viewsread 7 August 2026

📊 Managing multiple wallets on multiple chains is challenging. Luckily there are some pretty good tools already that can help you 🔎 Here is a comparison of the best crypto onchain portfolio tracking tools for 2025: https://coinbrain.com/blog/choosing-the-best-crypto-portfolio-tracker-in-2025-features-comparisons-and-top-picks

19 Feb 2025, 14:11 UTC315 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🇦🇷 The $LIBRA saga continues: https://coinbrain.com/blog/libra-crypto-update-it-s-worse-than-we-thought

🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @coinbraincomann. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CoinBrain Announcements” (@coinbraincomann), 628 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coinbraincomann.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.