Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cogita

Channel

Cogita

@cogita_de_hoc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

54subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003074307131
TypeChannel
Username@cogita_de_hoc
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged5 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cogita_de_hoc

Growth

545554.57 August 2026 — 55 subscribers10 August 2026 — 55 subscribers16 August 2026 — 54 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 54–55 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 05:4654-1
10 Aug 2026, 08:3155no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:2455first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 57s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

215 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52152186453822113324018.6%
custom 57985804437626597063918.1%
💯2511.6%
custom 6138810890910173260156.98%
custom 5402449103177130965146.51%
custom 6102848541330249485146.51%
146.51%
🤣146.51%
custom 5215707253746707239125.58%
custom 5287238873204672818104.65%
custom 520862114611882390494.19%
custom 537092571396676931362.79%
🏆31.40%

Custom emoji. 9 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 215 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 January 2026 to 8 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Mar 2026, 10:38 UTC83 views9 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤣5custom 53709257139667693132custom 61388108909101732602

25 Feb 2026, 08:50 UTC106 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👁 Стала популярной тема мотивации, будь то инста или тг. Причем тебе просто вкидывают "не сдавайся", "работай усерднее" и прочие мнимые советы. Это как если бы тонущему туристу кричали: "греби сильнее", "продолжай плыть", "делай уже что-нибудь", а он и плавать-то не умеет, та и силы закончились. Короч импакта мало от этих советов 🤔 🧐 Вот заметил, как часто всякие коучи в рилсах льют мотивационный контент, призывая к

3💯3custom 52152186453822113322custom 52157072537467072392custom 52872388732046728182

22 Feb 2026, 07:12 UTC81 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👁 " -...И уродство будет признано красотой. И самый уродливый будет признан самым красивым… — Тонио проснулся в холодном поту. — Какой отвратительный сон… — подумал он, чувствуя, как сердце колотится в груди"

custom 579858044376265970662

20 Feb 2026, 06:31 UTC77 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

У HR всё стабильно 🪶

custom 57985804437626597066

19 Feb 2026, 08:02 UTC63 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

👁 Советую посмотреть фильм «Нефариус» 🍄 Сюжет строится на диалоге между тюремным психиатром и обаятельным, но опасным заключённым Эдвардом Брэйди, который утверждает, что он демон, с некоторыми намерениями вселившийся в человеческое тело, и в ходе разговора приводит всё более пугающие аргументы в пользу своей сверхъестественной сущности 🆚 👁 Если смотреть с точки зрения теологии, то скорее это фильм-притча. О том, ч

custom 521521864538221133264

13 Feb 2026, 07:53 UTC80 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🍄 Вообще в шоке, если честно. Не осуждаю и не поддерживаю - просто не понимаю этого. Люди бьют логотипы каких-то компаний, в которых через пару лет, возможно, и работать никто не захочет. А может беспощадный бизнес просто захочет сократить/заменить (оптимизировать). И всё это на теле, навсегда 😈

💯8custom 52157072537467072393custom 61388108909101732603

1 Feb 2026, 09:55 UTC103 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

🫤 Ошибаться - нормально. Ведь это реально признак того, что ты двигаешься за пределы привычного, выделяешься из массы 👥. Но суть не в факте ошибки, а в том, что происходит после. Есть огромная, ПРИНЦИПИАЛЬНАЯ, разница между ошибаться разумно и ошибаться впустую. Разумная ошибка - это однозначно осознанная тема. Ты пробуешь новый способ/путь, понимая риски, и если не получается, то платишь временем/силами/ресурсами од

custom 52152186453822113325💯3custom 61388108909101732602

28 Jan 2026, 11:21 UTC112 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

😈😈😈

custom 57985804437626597068custom 52086211461188239043custom 61028485413302494852🤣1

26 Jan 2026, 06:57 UTC111 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😏 А что не так? Всё валидно же...

custom 57985804437626597067custom 54024491031771309654custom 61028485413302494853

25 Jan 2026, 07:42 UTC96 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

😏 "В одиночку", "Без команды", "Самостоятельно" - типо, вот он, сам всё решил, сам всё потянул. В теории звучит круто, а на практике часто нужен взгляд со стороны, какая-то свежая идея. Устал/выгорел - поддержать некому. И "независимость" по факту превращается в петлю, где ты и начальник, и команда, и единственное слабое звено ☢️ 😎 Сила не в том, чтобы тянуть всё в гору соло. А в том, что твоя слабая сторона - это ч

5custom 52152186453822113325💯3custom 52157072537467072391

22 Jan 2026, 06:44 UTC80 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

👁 Заметил очень интересный феномен, характерный как раз для молодых ребят. Челы романтизируют резкий уход с работы ради своего дела, считая это смелым рывком к свободе. А на деле получается прыжок с обрыва, имея парашют, который возможно не раскроется. Чаще всего из этого не выходит ничего хорошего, и юный предприниматель получает лишь выгорание и потерю веры в себя. А потом 🟣 опять возвращение в найм. И ведь всё на

custom 52152186453822113328💯5🏆3

21 Jan 2026, 07:27 UTC67 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

🤣4custom 54024491031771309654custom 57985804437626597063

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cogita_de_hoc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cogita” (@cogita_de_hoc), 54 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cogita_de_hoc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.