впервые удалил базу данных, и не понял как) 😌🙌
❤2😐2

Channel
@coffeperedsnom
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
19subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001727994253 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coffeperedsnom |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coffeperedsnom |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:01 | 19 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:30 | 19 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
107 reactions across 17 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 56 | 52.3% | |
| 🔥 | 16 | 15.0% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 7.48% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 6.54% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 4.67% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 2.80% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 1.87% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 😐 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🙊 | 2 | 1.87% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.935% | |
| 💩 | 1 | 0.935% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 March 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
впервые удалил базу данных, и не понял как) 😌🙌
❤2😐2
Второй официальный бот @Stickers тоже обзавелся своим мини-приложением. ⬇️@MiniAppsForLife 🔘#новости
❤2👀2
Впервые за долгое время проб и ошибок мне удалось запустить свой первый Telegram Mini App! @jupsidupsi_bot Это мини приложение интегрированное в telegram. Как @wallet или популярный кликкер @notcoin_bot Если кому-то хочется поглубже узнать о возможностях и перспективах TMA, рекомендую ознакомиться с каналом Романа Игнатенко. На его канале он в формате интервью рассказывает о проектах и людях-энтузиастах, стоящих з…
❤5
Вот они боевые роботы: https://habr.com/ru/articles/872112/ В статье написано про гражданское примение, но если немного пораскинуть мозгами можно увидеть военный потенциал этих технологий. Мне жутко от такого🙊
👀1💩1
Прям кино, двадцатые эра нейронок! ссылка
❤1
Не могу не поделиться. Таковы реалии IT-рынка. Когда ты крупный и престижный монополист, проще крутить новичками, заряженными юношеским максимализмом. IT-рынок давно на стороне работодателя. Это не хорошо и не плохо — просто так устроено. Без оценок.
Рецепт псиопа от Яндекса: как исключительным людям можно платить на 20-30% ниже рынка Зарплаты в Яндексе — секрет Полишинеля. Все знают, что там недоплачивают, но представители компании в публичной коммуникации (например, тут и тут) отрицают это. У компании нет проблем с бабками, и там работают лучшие инженеры. Если можно не платить, то зачем это делать? У Яндекса выработалась схема, как недоплачивать, она выглядит …
❤2
Как поднять 30 миллионов тенге за один день? 💸 Звучит как фантастика, но это реально! В Казахстане действует программа "Бюджет народного участия" — это инициатива, в рамках которой жители предлагают идеи по благоустройству, а государство выделяет на это деньги. И не маленькие — до 30 миллионов тенге на один проект! Я узнал об этом и решил: наш двор заслуживает лучшего. Начал с простого: пошёл по квартирам. Стучался…
🔥8
Мне написали стих, хочу и с вами поделиться прекрасным произведением❤️ За ворохом слов и эмоцией тела За сотней болот утопающих душ На черной доске нестираемым мелом Рисуются сотни белеющих луж Белеют от белой волны облаков От яркого солнца, сжигая ресницы Ни боли, ни слез, и ни звука, ни слов Без них всему так удалось проясниться Тяжелый комок, сгусток нефти внутри Чуть выше ребра, где-то около сердца А если вним…
💘5🥰5
Список 125 никнеймов из 5 символов, в комментариях. Fragment — это площадка, где продаются и покупаются никнеймы для Telegram. Недавно решил сам попробовать подобрать себе интересный ник. На Fragment короткие ники очень ценятся. Например, такие как @news, @auto или @bank — их уже продали за сотни тысяч долларов. Но можно найти и доступные варианты, особенно среди никнеймов из 5 символов. Вот реальные примеры, кот…
🔥4
А теперь и продолжение дня рождения 😁, всё теперь буду объедаться фисташковым тортом:]
😍5
Всех люблю 🥰
❤11❤🔥2🙊2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @coffeperedsnom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@coffeperedsnom named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bekbayev” (@coffeperedsnom), 19 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coffeperedsnom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.