🧊 Идеальный лед начинается с правильной воды. Знакомьтесь — BWT bestico! Когда мы говорим о качестве воды в кофейне, чаще всего вспоминают кофемашину. Но есть еще одно оборудование, которому нужна надежная защита, — льдогенератор. Именно для него компания BWT разработала специальную серию BWT bestico. Главная особенность этой серии — двойная защита: ✅ удаление механических примесей (песок, ржавчина, взвеси); ✅ сн…

Channel
COFFEESTATE | ТЕРРИТОРИЯ КОФЕ
@coffee_state
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,220subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001715791376 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @coffee_state |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/coffee_state |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 1,220 | -4 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 1,224 | +4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:13 | 1,220 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 1,221 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:14 | 1,221 | first reading |
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 8.70%
- avg views ÷ 1,220 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 106
- 15 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 4.10%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 15
- of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 15 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,593 |
| Reactions total | 63 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 7m 02s
- Average length
- 2m 21s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
63 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 21 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 31.7% | |
| 👍 | 10 | 15.9% | |
| 👎 | 4 | 6.35% | |
| 🗿 | 3 | 4.76% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 🥱 | 2 | 3.17% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 1.59% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Sanremo ZOE 2026 Competition уже в нашем шоуруме. Приходите на тест-драйв! ☕️ Мы часто говорим, что кофемашину нельзя выбирать только по фотографиям или характеристикам. На ней нужно поработать самому. Именно поэтому сейчас на втором этаже COFFEESTATE | ТЕРРИТОРИЯ КОФЕ установлена для тестирования Sanremo ZOE 2026 Competition TALL CB 2GR — одна из самых интересных моделей в линейке Sanremo. Она создана для тех, к…
👎4🗿3👌2🥱2😱1
💧 Питьевая вода — это тоже часть сервиса. И именно для нее создан BWT bestcare. Большинство владельцев кофеен уделяют большое внимание воде для приготовления кофе. Но есть еще одна важная зона — вода, которую гости пьют напрямую. Диспенсер в зале, кулер для сотрудников, система подачи холодной воды — все это требует отдельного подхода к фильтрации. Именно для таких задач компания BWT water+more разработала серию B…
🔥1
💧 BWT besttaste — когда воде нужно улучшить вкус, а не менять минерализацию Не каждой кофейне нужна сложная система умягчения или обратного осмоса. Если исходная вода уже достаточно мягкая, но в ней чувствуется хлор, посторонний запах или водопроводный привкус, стоит обратить внимание на серию BWT besttaste. Это профессиональные комбинированные фильтры с активированным углем и встроенной механической очисткой. Что…
🔥2
🔧 Маленькая деталь, без которой не работает вся система фильтрации BWT Когда говорят о системах фильтрации BWT, чаще всего вспоминают картриджи BWT Bestmax или Bestmax PREMIUM. Но есть один элемент, который остается «за кадром», хотя именно он объединяет всю систему в единое целое. Это BWT besthead FLEX — универсальная головная часть фильтра. На первый взгляд кажется, что это просто крепление для картриджа. На сам…
❤2
Почему систему фильтрации воды не нужно прятать?
👍2
💧 Почему систему фильтрации воды не нужно прятать? Во многих кофейнях мы сталкиваемся с одной и той же ситуацией. Приезжаем на аудит и задаем простой вопрос: — Где у вас установлена система фильтрации воды? И начинается настоящий квест. Бариста не знает, управляющий ищет ее под мойкой, за холодильником, за коробками или в техническом шкафу. А ведь система фильтрации — это один из самых важных элементов кофейного …
🔥2👍1
Предварительная фильтрация BWT — первая линия защиты кофемашины и вкуса кофе Многие считают, что система водоподготовки начинается с основного картриджа BWT Bestmax. Но прежде чем вода попадет в него, ее желательно очистить от того, что приходит из водопровода: песка, ржавчины, окалины, мелких взвесей, хлора и посторонних запахов. Именно эту работу выполняет блок предварительной фильтрации. Обычно система может вк…
🔥6
Машина времени продолжает работать. Сегодня архив снова подарил интересную находку — видео с кофейной выставки, снятое 10 лет назад. Тогда мы вместе с нашим другом и коллегой Иваном Макаренковым представляли продукцию MOTTA . Иван в то время выступал под брендом АВКМ — Академия высшего кофейного мастерства. В кадре также можно увидеть Алексея Кондратьева, который рассказывает о продукции MOTTA, а Иван делится опыто…
👍4🔥4
Пекарня Limbo приехала на фестиваль уличного искусства «Коробка × ЗИЛАРТ» . И это выглядит именно так. ☕🥐 К двум часам дня площадка фестиваля и Limbo Bakery & Coffee Roasters уже работает в полную силу. Из печи — свежая выпечка. Из кофемашины — ароматный эспрессо и молочные напитки. А Bravilor Bonamat B-Compact уже приготовил первые 10 литров фильтр-кофе и уверенно проходит испытание реальным потоком гостей. На…
❤6
Posted without readable text
❤3
Posted without readable text
🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @coffee_state. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 232,930 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“COFFEESTATE | ТЕРРИТОРИЯ КОФЕ” (@coffee_state), 1,220 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coffee_state.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.