Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PICK de_kitchen

Channel

PICK de_kitchen

@coestigeres

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

238subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 21 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002200513520
TypeChannel
Username@coestigeres
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded21 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/coestigeres

Growth

22623823221 August 2026 — 226 subscribers22 August 2026 — 228 subscribers28 August 2026 — 234 subscribers4 September 2026 — 236 subscribers12 September 2026 — 238 subscribers21 August 202612 September 2026
5 measurements spanning 22 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 224–240 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 12:39238+2
4 Sept 2026, 21:37236+2
28 Aug 2026, 13:33234+6
22 Aug 2026, 02:13228+2
21 Aug 2026, 01:15226first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 25 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

438 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16337.2%
custom 54696785183192076676314.4%
🔥5612.8%
❤‍🔥5412.3%
💘204.57%
😍204.57%
🍓132.97%
👍132.97%
🥰132.97%
81.83%
custom 528054244795957261261.37%
🦄61.37%
10.228%
👀10.228%
😁10.228%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 438 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 25 May 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 13 we hold a reading for · 46%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @coestigeres. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 13 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 25 May 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC513 views24 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026

История одного инвайта Апрель. Разгар сезона. Письмо с инвайтом на участие в закрытой квалификации к Stake ep. 2. Буквально за месяц до начала лана в Барселоне. - Хм, а за 30 дней визу сделаешь? Помни, туристический сезон. - Вызовы мы любим, но на вещи смотри реально. Не-а, без шансов. - Есть смысл квалу-то играть? -Лучше сосредоточиться на туриках, где в плей-офф выйти можем. -Скип? -Скип. Это было чётким сигналом

10custom 54696785183192076678❤‍🔥6

15 Aug 2026, 18:51 UTC162 views30 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @nucleartigeresVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

12❤‍🔥10💘8

11 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC394 views48 reactions2 Starsread 21 August 2026

Почему тигры скипнули EWC? Начну с того, что EWC 2026 это действительно крутой турнир и в целом событие в мире CS. И естественно, мы хотели бы принять в нем участие, Но… У каждой организации каждое принятое решение должно учитывать все возможные риски. Так как наша команда ставит перед собой большие цели, мы должны выстраивать свое планирование с учетом этого факта. А теперь к причинам: 1. Визовые ограничения На

custom 54696785183192076672114👍8❤‍🔥31😁1

8 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC818 views33 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Video

2 года пролетело …вот, действительно, как одно мгновение. Сейчас перелистываю свою галерею и не верю, что все произошедшие события были в этой жизни🙈 Каждый день уникален, каждый человек уникален, каждое воспоминание уникально Я хочу верить, что это только начало большой истории😍 а мы все имеем возможность в ней участвовать🥹 С днём рождения, тигрёнки!😆

20💘7🦄6

28 Jul 2026, 09:54 UTC≈1,070 views30 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Когда у Тигров буткемп? Кто, как не менеджер, ответит на этот вопрос? В 2025 году у нас был годовой буткемп в Токсово. Такой формат дал хорошие результаты, но со временем сказались усталость от постоянного совместного проживания и нехватка времени с близкими. Поэтому мы решили отказаться от длительных сборов и проводить их точечно — перед важными турнирами. Именно так прошел двухнедельный буткемп перед CIS LAN в 202

13custom 54696785183192076678custom 52805424479595726126❤‍🔥3

22 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC378 views46 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Video

Лук тигрицы🥹

😍18❤‍🔥15🔥8custom 54696785183192076674💘1

22 Jun 2026, 09:59 UTC566 views56 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Как так вышло? Расскажу вам историю о том, как повар команды стал менеджером 😄 Вам известно, что на протяжении года жизни на буткемпе я проводила с нашей командой огромное количество времени. За этот период я узнала много нового не только о CS, но и о внутренних процессах организации. Одна из моих суперспособностей — вовлекаться в любой процесс, к которому я имею отношение. Поэтому неудивительно, что за это время

30🔥138🍓3💘2

22 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC335 views54 reactionsread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @nucleartigeresPhoto

😎😎 🐅 Welcome, qaz! Рады официально представить менеджера Nuclear TigeRES — Викторию 'qaz' Забрускову! Вика уже работала с командой, теперь же поприветствуем её в новой должности 🖤

23custom 546967851831920766715❤‍🔥8🍓5🔥3

19 Jun 2026, 09:24 UTC411 views36 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Photo

СЕЗОН ЗАКРЫТ. Несколько дней назад мы отыграли крайний турнир сезона. Заняли там первое место и вышли на заслуженный отдых🤩 31-я строчка рейтинга - это результат работы за эти полгода. Стартовали сезон с 64-й) За это время организация претерпела немало изменений: как в составе команды, так и в управлении) Было непросто, но мы точно стали сильнее, увереннее, стабильнее. Если честно, третий день улыбка не сходит с л

🔥21custom 54696785183192076677❤‍🔥53

9 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC325 views28 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Forwarded from @nucleartigeresPhoto

Майский лан глазами ООО Илюха Флаузер ☺️ 😎 Смотрим тут 😎 Или тут

14👍5🥰5🍓3💘1

9 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC360 views3 reactionsread 21 August 2026

Вы знаете, что нужно сделать❤️

3

28 May 2026, 08:10 UTC452 views36 reactions3 Starsread 21 August 2026
Photo

Он готов🤩

20🥰8❤‍🔥4🍓2😍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @coestigeres. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PICK de_kitchen” (@coestigeres), 238 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/coestigeres.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.