Channel
@codrops
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
233subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002010126866 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @codrops |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/codrops |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:13 | 233 | -2 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:16 | 235 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 | 236 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:37 | 236 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 175 |
| Reactions total | 5 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 12 | 75.0% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 18.8% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 6.25% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
As part of our celebration of the upcoming Three.js Conference, we're highlighting wonderful creators from the Three.js community. This time, Frank Reitberger shares Garden Anomaly, a playful WebGPU & TSL experiment combining physics, glass deformations, and procedurally generated sound into a mesmerizing interactive sphere. Take a look
❤1
Desperate for some truly human-designed website inspiration? Together with our friends at Readymag, we picked out a collection of websites that are playful, unique, unexpected, and full of personality. An antidote to the sameness of the web, with a little treat from Readymag waiting for you at the end. Check it out
❤1
✨ The first Three.js Conference is coming to Paris! To celebrate, we’re highlighting the incredible creativity of the community with a series of Three.js gems from wonderful people who are generously sharing their experiments, techniques, and creative ideas with us. First up: Sujen Phea and her endlessly scrolling glass xylophone, a mesmerizing experiment built with Three.js, shaders, fluid simulation, interaction,…
🔥2❤1
Some interactions feel effortless, but they're often made up of several small systems working together. In today's tutorial, Surya Aditya breaks down an infinite scrolling gallery built with GSAP, from the looping scroll to the parallax, reveal animations, and FLIP transitions. Follow along
What does it take to build work that moves people and missions forward? Step inside Studio Freight’s world to explore their thoughtful approach to strategy, digital experiences, and the craft behind projects for ElevenLabs, Perplexity, Psyop, and more.
Between print and digital, structure and movement, silence and interaction. FLOT NOIR’s website for architecture studio MERSI turns a generic Webflow foundation into a deeply tailored digital experience. Clément Merouani shares the story behind the project, with development insights from Thomas Carré.
Some studios have a signature you recognize instantly. Garden Eight is one of them. Based in Tokyo, they've built a body of work defined by calm, thoughtful interactions and a distinctive sense of flow. In our latest spotlight, they offer a rare look into their creative process, sharing some of their favorite projects and explaining how design, development, and motion come together as one continuous practice.
👍1🔥1
How do you make serverless AI infrastructure feel tangible? That was the challenge behind Cerebrium's website, and the result is a beautiful blend of storytelling, 3D, and WebGL. Célia Lopez and Mathis Biabiany take us behind the scenes.
What does it take to bring real alpine terrain to the web? 🏔️ Filip Zrnzevic takes us behind the scenes of Ridgeline, exploring how Webflow, the Webflow MCP, Three.js, React Three Fiber and GSAP came together to create a cinematic 3D journey, without sacrificing editability. Follow along
Great digital work has the power to make even the most complex subjects feel intuitive, engaging, and memorable. In our latest Studio Spotlight, Unseen Studio takes us through the projects, journey, and creative philosophy behind their distinctive approach to digital craft.
How do you turn more than 1GB of production 3D assets into a WebGL experience under 10MB that runs smoothly on mobile? Today, Sindhur Dutta from BUNQ LABS breaks down the engineering, shaders, and performance techniques behind ZERO, the defiant interactive narrative that's as much an engineering feat as a creative one.
This September, the Three.js community gathers in Paris for the very first Three.js Conference 🎉 We asked some of the speakers what's currently occupying their brains and what they're excited to share in Paris 👀 Meet the full lineup, get to know some of the people behind the talks, and don't miss our exclusive 15% ticket discount. Check it out
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @codrops. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“codrops” (@codrops), 233 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codrops.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.