Channel
@codoh_official
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
387subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001941366905 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @codoh_official |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/codoh_official |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 06:55 | 387 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:13 | 381 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 380 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 380 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (26 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,347 |
| Reactions total | 70 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
70 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 37 | 52.9% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 31.4% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.14% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 👨💻 | 2 | 2.86% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.43% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
What do Prof. G. Wellers, Prof. J. Markiewicz, Prof. J. Roth, Dr. R. Green, Prof. J. Zimmerman, and Prof. M. Shermer have in common? They all tried to refute the scientific findings of Holocaust revisionism — and they all failed. This volume discusses these and more authors and exposes their attempts at refutation as a mixture of scientific bungling and fraud. This title is available from ARMREG: https://armreg.co.u…
🔥3
Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/download-our-encyclopedia-free-of-charge/
🔥2
From 1940 to 1943, Rudolf Höss was the commandant of the infamous Auschwitz Camp. After the war, he was captured by the British. In the following 13 months until his execution, he made 85 depositions of various kinds, in which he confessed his involvement in the “Holocaust.” This study analyzes them all by checking Höss’s claims for internal consistency and comparing them with established historical facts. The result…
👍2
Revisionist Holocaust Encyclopedia entry of the day: Janowska Camp Read the full entry here: https://holocaustencyclopedia.com/instruments/camp/other-camp/janowska-camp/588/
👍2
Pressac’s 1989 book was a trail blazer. Its many document reproductions are still valuable, but after decades of additional research, Pressac’s annotations are outdated. This book serves as an update and correction to Pressac’s epic tome, whether you own an original, read it online, borrow it from a library or purchase a reprint hopefully soon on sale. This title is available from ARMREG: https://armreg.us/product/a…
⚡3👏1
CODOH article of the day: Truth Lost, Truth Found A Review of Finding Treblinka by Caroline Sturdy Colls Read it here: https://codoh.com/library/document/truth-lost-truth-found/
🔥3
The Holocaust was perhaps the greatest crime of the 20th century. Six million Jews, we are told, died by gassing, shooting, and deprivation. Much has been written about this crime. And yet much remains a mystery. Even some basic questions have no clear answers. For example, we would like to know: -Where did the six million figure come from? -How, exactly, did the gas chambers work? -Why do we have so little physical…
👍6
CODOH video of the day: HoloCast, Episode 6: Legality Watch it here: https://codoh.com/library/document/holocast-episode-6-legality/
👍3🔥2
It is claimed that at Treblinka Camp, between 700,000 and 3,000,000 Jews were murdered in 1942 and 1943. The weapons used were alleged to have been stationary and/or mobile gas chambers, poison gases of both fast acting and slow acting varieties, unslaked lime, superheated steam, electricity, diesel exhaust fumes… This thorough study exposes the Treblinka hoax. This title is available from ARMREG: https://armreg.co.…
❤1
More new content from CODOH! Click here to read: https://codoh.com/library/document/the-chemistry-of-treblinka/
❤1🔥1
New from CODOH: https://codoh.com/library/document/siegfried-verbeke-unsung-hero-of-revisionism/
❤3
The 1985 Toronto Trial against German immigrant Ernst Zündel for his disbelief in the orthodox Holocaust narrative was a turning point in revisionist history. This book makes the text of the complete court transcript available to the public. This title is available from ARMREG: https://armreg.us/product/the-first-zundel-trial-the-court-transcript-of-the-canadian-false-news-trial-of-ernst-zundel-1985/
🔥6
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @codoh_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 130,849 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Committee for Open Debate on the Holocaust” (@codoh_official), 387 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codoh_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.