3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 532–533 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 00:02
532
-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:10
533
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:47
533
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
216 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
72
33.3%
❤
49
22.7%
🔥
43
19.9%
👏
28
13.0%
🤔
15
6.94%
😢
4
1.85%
🤯
4
1.85%
🎉
1
0.463%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 27 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Official Clarification Regarding Recent Statement on CodeXchain
In light of the recent public update made regarding CodeXchain, I feel it is necessary to provide factual clarification to prevent any misleading interpretation about the company’s internal situation and my role as CMO.
Over the past year, it is true that CodeXchain faced significant internal challenges. However, the claim that “the CMO left” is inaccu…
😏 Tired of the Old Way? There’s a New Way to Build.
The traditional path of Web3 development is slow and complicated. What if there was a better, smarter, and faster way to bring your ideas to life?
❌ Traditional Web3 Development:
▪️ Months of coding & testing: You get stuck in endless cycles of writing and debugging, with time spent on boilerplate tasks instead of core innovation.
▪️ High costs for security audits…
💡 You have the idea. We have the tools.
In the world of Web3, innovation shouldn’t be limited to a select few with deep coding expertise. We believe everyone should have the power to create.
❌ Your brilliant Web3 idea is stuck because:
▪️ You’re not a coder, and the thought of learning Solidity or Rust from scratch feels overwhelming.
▪️ Getting started seems too complex, with a steep learning curve for blockchain …
We've designed CodeXchain to be a powerful, all-in-one platform for Web3. But which of our core features gets you most excited to build?
What's your favorite CodeXchain feature?
1️⃣ AI-Powered Tools37%
2️⃣ No-Code/Low-Code11%
3️⃣ Multi-Chain Support16%
4️⃣ All-in-one platform37%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Is Your dApp Really Secure?
In the fast-paced world of Web3, launching a new dApp is an exciting milestone, but it also comes with a serious and silent threat.
❌ The Silent Threat:
▪️ Smart contract vulnerabilities are a constant and evolving risk.
▪️ Manual audits are not only expensive and time-consuming, but can also miss critical flaws.
▪️ One small bug, a single oversight in the code, can lead to a huge loss o…
⚡️ The Web3 space has long been dominated by conversations about smart contracts, but the reality is that a truly successful decentralized application needs more.
It requires a seamless front-end, reliable back-end logic, and a secure smart contract—a full-stack solution. CodeXchain's no-code platform is built to deliver exactly that.
Our platform is not just a smart contract generator. It's a unified environment w…
The Web3 space is expanding fast, and we're here to help you build the future. We're curious to know what kind of project you're dreaming of.
What kind of dApp would you build with us?
1️⃣ DeFi (Finance)76%
2️⃣ Gaming6%
3️⃣ Social Media18%
4️⃣ NFT Marketplace0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
☄️ CodeXchain shatters the misconception that blockchain development is only for experts.
Our platform bridges no-code simplicity with pro-grade power, empowering every developer.
▪️ The No-Code Advantage. Our no-code platform is a game-changer for rapid prototyping. It allows you to use intuitive drag-and-drop interfaces to create dApps in minutes. Integrations with Figma and Bubble make bringing your ideas to Web…
⚡️ CodeXCoder Vision is a revolutionary tool within the CodeXchain ecosystem, making Web3 innovation faster and more accessible for everyone.
Built on a proprietary AI engine, it is trained on a specialized blockchain dataset. This allows it to:
▪️ Understand Your Vision: Translate your high-level descriptions into functional smart contract code.
▪️ Generate Secure Code: The AI produces optimized code to help you av…
With CodeXchain, you can build on any blockchain. If you could launch a new project on one network today, which would you choose?
Which chain would you BUIDL on first?
1️⃣ Ethereum42%
2️⃣ Solana38%
3️⃣ Polygon0%
4️⃣ Another L1/L221%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🫥 At CodeXchain, the $CDX token is not just a utility, it's a key mechanism for fostering participation and driving the growth of our ecosystem.
Empowering Engagement Through $CDX
The $CDX token is strategically integrated to encourage active involvement and reward valuable contributions:
▪️ Access to Premium Features: Holding $CDX grants users access to advanced AI-powered tools and in-depth analysis.
▪️ Governanc…
AI is set to revolutionize Web3. We're curious to know what you think is its most valuable application.
What's the #1 benefit of AI in Web3?
1️⃣ Faster dev speed10%
2️⃣ Enhanced security30%
3️⃣ Smarter dApps40%
4️⃣ Boosting adoption20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤2🔥2👏1🤔1🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @codexchainofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
We've designed CodeXchain to be a powerful, all-in-one platform for Web3. But which of our core features gets you most excited to build?
What's your favorite CodeXchain feature?
1️⃣ AI-Powered Tools37%
2️⃣ No-Code/Low-Code11%
3️⃣ Multi-Chain Support16%
4️⃣ All-in-one platform37%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
The Web3 space is expanding fast, and we're here to help you build the future. We're curious to know what kind of project you're dreaming of.
What kind of dApp would you build with us?
1️⃣ DeFi (Finance)76%
2️⃣ Gaming6%
3️⃣ Social Media18%
4️⃣ NFT Marketplace0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
With CodeXchain, you can build on any blockchain. If you could launch a new project on one network today, which would you choose?
Which chain would you BUIDL on first?
1️⃣ Ethereum42%
2️⃣ Solana38%
3️⃣ Polygon0%
4️⃣ Another L1/L221%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
CodeXchain is making the future of Web3 AI accessible to everyone. From no-code tools to AI-powered code generation, the possibilities are endless.
If you had our AI tools, what would you build? What's your AI-powered Web3 creation?
1️⃣ New dApp32%
2️⃣ AI trading bot26%
3️⃣ Smart Contract11%
4️⃣ AI Agent32%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
CodeXchain is all about solving the biggest problems in Web3 development. We've built tools to help you BUIDL smarter and faster.
We're curious to know what challenge you face most often. What's your biggest Web3 dev hurdle?
1️⃣ Complex coding68%
2️⃣ Slow deployment0%
3️⃣ Multi-chain dev5%
4️⃣ Security risks26%
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2025 to 27 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 466,283 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“CodeX Announcement” (@codexchainofficial), 532 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codexchainofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.