Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Code web Cast

Channel

Code web Cast

@codewebcast

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

33subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002289811351
TypeChannel
Username@codewebcast
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 6 November 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged4 times, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/codewebcast

Growth

333433.514 August 2026 — 34 subscribers15 August 2026 — 34 subscribers23 August 2026 — 33 subscribers14 August 202623 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33–34 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 22:4633-1
15 Aug 2026, 15:4434no change
14 Aug 2026, 23:3234first reading

Engagement

14 posts held, back to 6 November 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,634 reactions across 4 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤩27516.8%
👏25015.3%
🎉24114.7%
🔥23714.5%
🥰23214.2%
👍20412.5%
19511.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2024 to 11 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Nov 2024, 03:36 UTC695 views508 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🚨Scam alert 😤😤🚨 Kuch log youtube oe hai jo bolte hai hai BDG, 91club, Big Daddy inlogo ka apna copyright ©️. Safe rahiye ye log bahoot bade Wale scammer hai market me work kar rahe hai. Aap logo ko v pata hona chahiye ki ye colour prediction game ke sare websit and apk Chinese hai. ⚠️ Be safe and alert ⚠️

🔥80🎉77👍75🥰74👏70🤩7062

8 Nov 2024, 18:23 UTC674 views411 reactionsread 14 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

🎉76🥰70🤩65👏59👍5445🔥42

8 Nov 2024, 18:11 UTC317 views96 reactionsread 14 August 2026

https://youtu.be/RHV4w8dqSTU

🤩46🔥28👍7👏74🥰4

6 Nov 2024, 13:03 UTCviews —

Code web Cast pinned «@Codecast24 77650 65039 whatsapp only Contact us 😁😁»

6 Nov 2024, 13:03 UTC193 viewsread 14 August 2026

@Codecast24 77650 65039 whatsapp only Contact us 😁😁

6 Nov 2024, 12:41 UTC192 views619 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏114🤩94🎉88🔥8784🥰84👍68

Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @codewebcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Code web Cast” (@codewebcast), 33 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/codewebcast.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.