Channel
@cobrabotnet
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
202subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001903771698 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cobrabotnet |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 5 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 24 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cobrabotnet |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:44 | 202 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:29 | 204 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:02 | 204 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 5 October 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 October 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Hello, Cobra botnet has been sold, as the old owner said before. IlgNorth delated his account few days ago and hes not the owner anymore. Someone pretends to be him so be aware of @llgNorthDv its not his account.
Cobra Botnet 🐍 pinned Deleted message
🩸🩸🅱️🩸🅰️➖🩸2️⃣ ⚠️We present new method ( Cobra-H2 ) 📌 Modern http/2 flooder for massive rqs ( ~5 mln / conc ) https://check-host.net/check-report/18aed356k76f https://check-host.net/check-report/18ae0632k6df ( 1 conc )
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ HTTP-EXPLOIT vs Google maps ( app/ site offline for several minutes )
🐍HTTP-EXPLOIT vs Telegram Bots Api system ( all bots on telegram down ) 1 concurrent https://check-host.net/check-report/189d4d5dk8f8
HTTP-EXPLOIT vs GOOGLE (New todays update of power) https://check-host.cc/report/asNixXUa9M1S7F69Aoq1sp https://check-host.net/check-report/189c91cek24
Client targets 🐍
Hello, we are happy to present new method „HTTP-EXPLOIT” new exploit for google protection sites, bypassing Akamai, Cloudflare http-ddos. https://check-host.net/check-report/1895372dk5ac New promotion for fresh start of Cobra C2: 1 concurrent - day 2 concurrent - week 4 concurrent - month For purchase/questions dm: @llgNorthDv
Hello, we are happy to announce that we tooked part in cooperation with astrix stresser, we set new record of 60 mln rps, feel free to join our channel: t.me/astrixnet Stay tuned for more updates 🫡
Photo, posted without a caption
Channel photo updated
I wanted to apologize for misunderstanding with cobra botnet, posts has been delated about them and about me. Best regards, @nixmessa
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @cobrabotnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 564,333 of 1,620,455entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@cobrabotnet named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Cobra Botnet 🐍” (@cobrabotnet), 202 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cobrabotnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.