头部AI大厂员工自述工作强度不降反升 90小时工作制已成行业常态 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]

Channel
cnBeta - 社会热点与趣闻 (Trends & Science & Buzz)
@cnbeta_com_buzz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
14subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003896692407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @cnbeta_com_buzz |
| Description | 网罗社会百态,探索科学新知。本频道网罗互联网热点、职场文化、新型社会事件,并兼顾天文、考古等自然科学冷知识。在硬核技术与严肃商业之外,为网民提供茶余饭后的奇闻怪事、科普动态与大众乐子。 cnBeta总频道 @cnbeta_com(仅推送精选) 软硬件技术 @cnbeta_com_tech 互动与娱乐 @cnbeta_com_media 商业与产业 @cnbeta_com_business 热点与趣闻 @cnbeta_com_buzz |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/cnbeta_com_buzz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 14 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:07 | 14 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 60.4%
- avg views ÷ 14 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 8.4
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 169 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 00:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Links
- 613
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
借力《堡垒之夜》广告宣发 美国FAA巧用电子游戏破解空管“人才荒” [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
美FCC批准太空反光镜项目引争议 专家警告或损伤视力并破坏生态 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
CT扫描揭示渡渡鸟头骨新奥秘 颠覆“蠢笨”传统刻板印象 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
最新研究提示细胞生命或曾“两次诞生” 独立起源于深海热泉? [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
达美航空一客机中途惊现伪造Wi-Fi信号 公司已启动调查 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
冥王星巨大心形冰原之下或有液态氮涌动 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
北美最长斜拉桥正式通车 戈迪·豪国际大桥连接美加两国 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
这种手机壳,可能正在偷拍你 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
调查:买二手车如“开盲盒”瓜子官方检测报告受质疑 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
马斯克发帖推荐大家去中国看看 母亲加入互动:“我同意” [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
有电脑有游戏 但下班太累了玩不动 万人共鸣认同 [精选新闻] · [软硬件技术] · [互动娱乐] · [商业产业] · [趣闻八卦]
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cnbeta_com_buzz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 52,952 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@cnbeta_com · 27,59053 postscnBeta - 商业与产业 (Industry & Business)
@cnbeta_com_business · 1820 postscnBeta.COM中文業界資訊站
@cnbeta_com_hk · 1,01820 postscnBeta - 互动与视听娱乐 (Digital Entertainment)
@cnbeta_com_media · 920 postscnBeta - 软硬件与技术 (Technology & Products)
@cnbeta_com_tech · 3120 posts雨声
@ameisbest · 1651 post纷飞的小窝
@sena_yuki_chan · 3841 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“cnBeta - 社会热点与趣闻 (Trends & Science & Buzz)” (@cnbeta_com_buzz), 14 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cnbeta_com_buzz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.