Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

На облачном берегу 🌅

@cloudshores

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

316subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001600757177
TypeChannel
Username@cloudshores
CreatedBetween 1 November 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/cloudshores

Growth

3143163156 August 2026 — 314 subscribers6 August 2026 — 314 subscribers13 August 2026 — 316 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 314–316 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 07:49316+2
6 Aug 2026, 22:17314no change
6 Aug 2026, 17:49314first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.5%
avg views ÷ 316 subscribers
Avg views / post
119
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (28 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total2,370
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC67 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

My fall will be for you, my love will be in you If you are the one to cut me I'll bleed forever #qijiu #art

6 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC69 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

У этих 79 существуют две версии: монохромная и текстурная. Россыпи ангзда — в обеих без регистрации и смс. После этого арта рисовать их ангст без хэппи-энда как отшептало: слишком просто скатиться в максимальную драму, а вот поди с той же лёгкостью доставь им фиксит!

5 Aug 2026, 15:18 UTC78 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Занзас Тимофеевич сурово выглядывает из шершавеньких текстур🪶 #khr #xanxus #art

5 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC89 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Чем околачивают груши?

  1. Известно чем48%
  2. Неизвестно, но можно предположить, чем!24%
  3. Капитан Неочевидность пребывает в замешательстве28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026

🍐 Обычно устраивают вечера поэзии, но сегодня у нас утро и контекстуальная загадка в честь урожайного сезона: четверостишие зачитывалось среди разных возрастных и географических групп, и далеко не всем, как оказалось, встречалось исходное выражение. Я не буду кушать груши, Пусть мне хоть доплачивают, Потому что знаю я, Чем их околачивают! В связи с чем ниже опрос, знаком ли исходник вам 🌚🍐 Алсо, кому люба занимате

4 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC93 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

🌜 Мо Жань — прилежный ученик, ни на что такое не намекает, шицзуней не смущает, но те всё равно смущаются🥰 #ranwan #2ha #art

4 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTC93 viewsread 6 August 2026
Poll

Двойное...

  1. гражданство41%
  2. проникновение68%
  3. удовольствие41%
  4. свой вариант (напишу в комментах)5%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

4 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC85 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

По таковому случаю хочется проголосовать!

1 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC141 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Капитан кавалерии и Полуночный герой деятельно (и наконец-то конно!) сотрудничают в вопросе поимки супостатов, периодически прерываясь на юст🌚🦄 Мой разворот для Zenith zine — цифрового зина кайлючьих АУшек. ✨ В коментах — файлом. ✨ Видео впроцесса. #kaeluc #horses #art

1 Aug 2026, 14:17 UTC118 viewsread 6 August 2026

Всегда с урчанием зачитываюсь Зорро-любивыми сюжетами (и регулярно перечитываю "Встречу при луне", о да🌝), поэтому нарисовать такой про Дилюка в модусе Полуночного героя замечталось сразу же по падении в кайлюков. And finally here we are🎭

1 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC129 viewsread 6 August 2026

🕯 Burn The Guilt Away, E, 3K Можно читать как приквел к Tell Me You Love Me, автор то же — вновь ласково вмещает в крохотный миник насквозь пробирающий сюжет звенящей пронзительности. Туман невысказанного густ, а слов использовано — минимально. Что утяжеляет смысл и вес каждого всё же написанного слова — и пробирает читателя just right. После прочтения заворожённо сижу @ сижу в попытках осознать, как в столь малое

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cloudshores. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

5 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Чем околачивают груши?

  1. Известно чем48%
  2. Неизвестно, но можно предположить, чем!24%
  3. Капитан Неочевидность пребывает в замешательстве28%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 14:22 UTCAnonymous Poll37 voters

Двойное...

  1. гражданство41%
  2. проникновение68%
  3. удовольствие41%
  4. свой вариант (напишу в комментах)5%

The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 67,292 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“На облачном берегу 🌅” (@cloudshores), 316 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudshores.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.