Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

CLOUD GANG (Дневник 104)

@cloudrecords104

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

74subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001549583639
TypeChannel
Username@cloudrecords104
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/cloudrecords104

Growth

748 Aug 2026, 12:05 — 74 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 21:46 — 74 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 12:059 Aug 2026, 21:46
2 measurements spanning 1 day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 73–75 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 21:4674no change
8 Aug 2026, 12:0574first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 June 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
161
Videos
112
Links
67

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
36s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

93 reactions across 15 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2830.1%
1819.4%
custom 51949712031812301991212.9%
🤝77.53%
custom 519531300526858138466.45%
custom 519539387091283138355.38%
🏆44.30%
😍44.30%
custom 519492303082803919422.15%
❤‍🔥22.15%
🎉11.08%
💘11.08%
💯11.08%
😁11.08%
🤯11.08%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 93reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 June 2025 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cloudrecords104. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 June 2025 to 28 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Feb 2026, 15:43 UTC48 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @sequence_familyPhoto

-Не спишь? Слышала последние сплетни? Там SEQUENCE в TWO SMOKE мутят какой-то лакшери движ. Во всех чатах только и обсуждают как одеться по-гламурней🤩 🌟 dj сеты в стиле нулевых от команды SEQUENCE 🤩лайв выступления от: STONE G BABY DI DIJON SLCH Welcome drinks до 22:00 🗓 7 МАРТА В 21:00 📍TWO SMOKE 💰 free вход для девушек 400₽ для мужчин 18+ FC/DC 🤙 БРОНЬ СТОЛОВ: +7 (925) 055-18-97 +7 (917) 555-09-96

🔥2

12 Feb 2026, 22:12 UTC62 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Dijon_demoPhoto

Dijon - «Выдыхаю - Заново» Трек в сети 🗣 Слушать: СЛУШАТЬ📢 Prod. by Cloud Records Rec. on ICE CREAM STUDIO Mix. by Mixed by Twinsy Animation by M1A1

3🔥3custom 51949712031812301993

12 Feb 2026, 22:11 UTC55 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @POP2025W

https://band.link/cum_back

🔥2💯1custom 51949712031812301991

4 Feb 2026, 19:24 UTC70 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Всем салют ! Как у вас дела ? Скоро выходит мой сингл «вдыхаю/ выдыхаю» 09.02 дропаю сниппет А пока вот дэмка со STONE G MM

🔥3custom 519539387091283138332🤯1

28 Jan 2026, 18:19 UTC85 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @POP2025W

13.02 Rec: https://t.me/Dijon_demo, @cloudrecords104 Prod by dumboshawty Mix by dumboshawty Cover : me & Fwed

❤‍🔥2🏆1🔥1

27 Jan 2026, 16:15 UTC47 views10 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MIXHEADDVideo

Video, posted without a caption

custom 51949712031812301994🔥3custom 519531300526858138421

27 Jan 2026, 16:15 UTC68 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @MIXHEADD

PHARAOH - pink phloyd [ MIXHEAD REMIX ] DROP: 28.01 UNIEIOHU - camera & edit CLOUDRECORDS - location POP - help

🏆3🔥2custom 51953938709128313832

22 Jan 2026, 20:22 UTC98 views5 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026

Первый был! Будем стараться почаще делать 👅

🔥3🤝1custom 51949230308280391941

22 Jan 2026, 19:24 UTC86 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Газ на стримчанский! https://vm.tiktok.com/ZGHovo3TY7hSB-9gogo

🔥3custom 51949230308280391941

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cloudrecords104. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 866,939 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CLOUD GANG (Дневник 104)” (@cloudrecords104), 74 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cloudrecords104.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.